It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LoneGunMan
Ok now I see I am arguing with a wall. EVERYONE IN THE FIRE SERVICE HAS HEARD OF IT.
They have NOT, NO ONE has ever seen this section about UFO's in the guideline!!
Give me a FEMA link anything that states the REAL guideline has this in it. Anything but TELEVISION! OR the Internet! Because in the REAL world of the fire service you are wrong.
This is not the official belief of FEMA or the International Firefighters Association. One author got all crazy and it got published.
I do however have access to the newest edition to the FEMA guidelines and in the fire service the one that has the UFO/Alien section is a joke with all the brotherhood.
It was a poor judgment error. The public should never have seen it now we have to pass the information down my word of mouth.
Give me a FEMA link anything that states the REAL guideline has this in it. Anything but TELEVISION! OR the Internet! Because in the REAL world of the fire service you are wrong.
Then you keep telling people the proof that it is by giving a link to a post you made on ATS?!?
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
This information is several years old. FEMA develops protocols for the unknown. Doesn't mean there are UFOs, just that they have a protocol in case one turns up. Seriously, do you expect the government to publish a smoking gun?
The documentary shows an American disaster control manual that was once used in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) National Fire Training Academy Open Learning Program. The 1993 manual is called Fire Officer's Guide to Disaster Control. It contains a shocking chapter about how "first responders" should manage incidents involving UFOs.
Disaster Resource
Peter W. Blaich, a fourth generation firefighter with the FDNY, is assigned to Ladder 123 in Crown Heights Brooklyn. He is accredited by the United States Department of Defense as a Fire Protection Specialist as well as a Community Emergency Response Team Instructor for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
Originally posted by Malcram
reply to post by Phage
I think the point may be, how does such a manual come to be in firehouses "across the US"?
For instance, school text books are often published independently, but certain ones become part of the syllabus decided by the education system and so become "required reading".
Who decided that this manual should appear in firehouses, and why? See what I mean?
Fire Officer's Guide to Disaster Control By Charles William Bahme Edition: 2 Published by PennWell Books, 1992 ISBN 0912212268, 9780912212265 641 pages
Originally posted by LoneGunMan
Not one firefighter, officer or instructor can find this claim in my county. I was in Lansing, Mi. yesterday and visited the state of Michigan fireboard and they told me this was a hoax. Now either the state of Michigan is lying to one of there registered firefighters or the TV was lying.
[edit on 16-4-2009 by LoneGunMan]
You saying it's not connected to FEMA means nothing. You have to provide some evidence that says it's not from FEMA.
Google Books
Fire Officer's Guide to Disaster Control By Charles William Bahme Edition: 2 Published by PennWell Books, 1992 ISBN 0912212268, 9780912212265 641 pages
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Originally posted by NephraTari
reply to post by Gawdzilla
that does not explain their section on how to treat an alien. If if was just for perceived purposes they would not try to give them instructions on how to help or interact with them.
So, they DID publish a smoking gun? And distributed it publicly? They just admitted they have knowledge of aliens, right? And don't mind you knowing, right?
Puh-leeze.
I do not use logic and reason to "explain away" things, I try to use logic and reason to understand things.
Originally posted by sdrawkcabIIMy advice to you skeptics is this, do not waste your time trying to use logic and reason to explain away things, that, if you were using logic and reason correctly in the first place, would not need explaining away. You dissappoint me!