posted on Apr, 13 2009 @ 08:31 PM
I sincerely apologise, no harm meant, sorry to the OP .
I still think my first response to this thread is relevant, my answers 1 through 5, it may not be a perfect response but its what i base my opinion
on, science and fact. It is easy to dismiss both sides of the 2012 argument, and no matter what you believe i cant expect to be the one to change
that. But what would it take to change a believers point of view? I am for sure a 2012 skeptic/denyer, but that could change if some proof is shown to
me, not just ancient writings or speculation of the future. Debunking 2012 is at the best a 50/50(probaly more like 85/15 for the skeptics) call and
that is being generous, it MAY be a bad call, but what is the point of worrying yourself untill you possibly get ill for the next 3 years.