posted on Apr, 17 2009 @ 07:04 AM
reply to post by UmbraSumus
In the article you referenced it says
"The Earth is fast becoming a hotter planet than anything yet experienced by humans," they write
"experienced by humans" - when are these people going to get it into their heads that "humans" are relatively new on this ball of mud and
certainly completely irrelevant as far as nature is concerned - dispensable.
Save CO2, if that is what you feel you[*See edit] must do, by removing yourself from the cycle, but I prefer to let nature get on with the job as has
been happening for billions of years. If puny little humans think the earth is getting too hot and too unbearable for them, just what right exactly do
they have to pontificate that this should not be allowed to happen?
Nuking Yellowstone would of course produce ultimately far more greenhouse gasses that it currently does, in addition to the pollution and radiation,
however there is always the chance that it would go a long way towards wiping out humanity and thus prevent global warming, which of course it will
not do since 'global warming' is a myth invented by the powers that be as a brilliant excuse to tax everyone to the hilt. They can get huge tax
revenues from something that they can do absolutely nothing to influence and which will continue - in which ever direction it likes - until long after
the current governments have gone.
Um, reading over this please let me make it clear I am not advocating that the poster I replied to should remove themself from the cycle. My apologies
if in some way it reads like that!!
That was generally directed at the scientists and other doom and gloom merchants.
[edit on 17/4/2009 by PuterMan]