posted on May, 12 2009 @ 06:01 AM
Originally posted by Biscuit
I have been absent for a page or two but I assume that nothing has really changed.
Sure things have changed!
Self confessed believer in the official story, Swampfox, has stated that evidence can not be accepted without a chain of custody.
Click here to read the thread.
Thanks for raising the bar with regards to evidence claims, Swampfox.
I will throw the following photos out as evidence that the fires were started by debris. Pay attention to photos 2,
Not admissable as evidence, it fails Swampfox's chain of custody test. Besides, where does it allegedly show burning debris from 1 striking 7?
Inadmissable as evidence. It has clearly been tampered with (yellow lettering) and has no chain of custody. Besides, where does it show alleged
burning debris from 1 striking 7? All it shows is a portion of the alleged collapsed WTC site.
You guessed it, it's unsourced, so it fails the chain of custody test. Inadmissable. Besides, where does it allegedly show burning debris from 1
Serious? You're kidding right? It's an alleged screen capture that fails proper chain of custody and does not show burning debris from 1 striking
7 - yet you want us to think it does?
See what happens when you leave the thread for a couple of pages? You start spreading disinformation and inadmissable evidence!
Thanks, Swampfox - I'm really liking the new chain of custody precedent that you've set. Let's see how the official supports itself!