Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Do you think von D. or Hancock are more credible than 99.999% of archeological research?
You`re one who goes around here all day serving black/white thinking. I personally know a few archaeologists who enjoy reading Daniken. Just because you dont does not mean everyone else doesn't.
Really? You exhibit classic "mine is good, everyone else is bad" behavior.
You are proud of the fact that you've read over a dozen books of fringe material. If you had read that many books on the "white" side, you might have a better grasp of the matter. I started reading fringe literature in the mid-1960s. Frank Edwards, I think the guy was called. I figured out rather rapidly how coherent his thinking was when I tried to confirm his theories with other literature.