reply to post by Southern Guardian
The very first reason you assert as support for your opposition is "Fox support." You fail to address or accept that the movement predates any
"FOX" involvement by weeks. False predicate. Not legitimate. Start at January 21, 2009. There is no "Newt," "Bush," or "FOX,"
Come up with a reason
, not an excuse
Your base reply is "Bushies." There is no such word outside of a liberal lexicon. "Ad hominem" is not a response. Still no legitimate support
except, "I'm a liberal ." Are you afraud to state that THIS is your SOLE basis for opposition?
Can you reply with facts and ideoloy and leave the words "Bushie" and "FOX" out? I doubt it, because you don't know what to say, except
question the motives of Tea Party advocates.
You can't identify an ideology because you don't have one, do you?
(If all you're going to do is say Bushies and FOX, save it and us, and just don't reply. You are an empty vessel into which Obama and Pelosi and
Reid can piss their vitriol for you to spew back for them. How shallow to have no position of your own!)
Will you state why you doubt the legitimacy of Tea Party advocates? Is it because no one can possibly oppose Obama/Liberalism? You can't because
you are nothing more than an echo chamber for other voices.
Let me make this real clear:
Many Americans do not agree with Government control of corporations.
Many Americans do not agree with usurpation of States Rights, such as determination of parameters for education, marriage, insurance and mortgage
underwriting, and abortion.
Many Americans do not support the Obama agenda of Federal control of energy, education and health care.
Many Americans do not agree with the Obama adminstration's 2010 Budget allocations and "Stimulus Package."
(Since these did not exist before Obama's administration, they can not be 'Bushy.')
Since CNN covered these events, why don't you relate the process to CNN? Instead, you pick a favored target of "FOX," as if their
affects the motivation of the participants. NPR covered the movement. MSNBC covered the movement. The "big three" broadcasters covered these
events. YOU are the one "holding hands" (more like a lip-lock) in your obsession with FOX coverage. Participants would have done so, and were
such, WITHOUT FOX!
You do not have one shred of evidence that these events were FOX inspired. Coverage does not equal support
"Holding hands" with CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC, NPR, et al, as you do, tells us what about you?
What evidence do you have of a "Bush fest?" I heard not one reference to any bush at the events I attended. Give us a source, or drop it.
Do you deny that Democtrats in Congress are now questioning Obama's policies
I agree that opposition to Obama was a uniting factor, but that does not equal 'pro-Bush.' Do you not understand that? Someone can oppose
wrongheaded policy without being sold to something else (much as you are wed to Obama/Liberalism).
Middle America marched together regardless of who followed, watched, cheered or booed. You don't understand that because you have no respect for
If you are so politically astute, tell me when and where Obama first called for an end to "Middle-classism" in America. Yes, he did. More than
once. Orally and in writing.
Can't answer, or won't? You, like Obama, want to see an end to the Middle Class, don't you?
DON'T YOU? ANSWER THIS ONE QUESTION.
You have yet to address the ideology; don't say "I have" when you
have not. I'm calling your bluff right here.
Do you agree with Government control of corporations (Fascism)?
Do you agree with Federal Government intervention into States' Rights? (Marriage, education, insurance and mortgage underwriting, abortion, private
production of energy?) (Socialism)
Do you agree with 'spreading the wealth' and social engineering at a Federal level? (Socialism)
Do you agree with 2010 budget and "Stimulus" allocations ans priorities? Do you know what they are? Attendees did! SPEAK UP ON THIS.
See, it's not hard to see, if you're willing to admit it.
You don't "buy" Tea Parties only because you are sold on Obama! No other reason. Just say it.
This is the 4th time I've asked you directly to state a position based on fact and ideology, not platitude and pejoratives. Go back and respond
on point with facts if you are not scared or incapable. I dare you.(Leaving out "Bushies," "fringers," and "FOX.")
You no doubt have neither the guts nor ability to state and support a position.
I fully expect your reply, if any, to be "Bushies" and "FOX."
I just did it for you.
[edit on 19-4-2009 by jdub297]