Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
So tiresome...
I'm sure, fighting reason and fact is not going to be an easy battle.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
No they were part of programmes to replace current issue military technology.
Not research projects for god's sakes.
That like saying that every Cancer research program must cure cancer completely after it concludes! Which is utterly ridiculous. The aim of a
research project may be to produce a new rifle for the infantry but that doesnt mean that not satisfying the Pentagon is tantamount to failure. This
is something I stated repeatedly, yet apparently you simply dont seem to understand ?
Have you ever been exposed to ongoing research ever ? Please find out and educate yourself before making absurd allegations.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
DARPA didn't develop half those projects. The US Army did, again to replace current issue hardware.
I was refering to the ones DARPA was involved in like the X-51 etc. Moreover the point is still valid be it DARPA or the US Army or whatever.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Quick munitions lecture:
Airbust munition = Explodes while airborne.
Thermobaric = Fuel-air mixture designed to create an immense fireball and resulting pressure wave.
Thus ends the lecture. The 20mm Airburst munition developed for the OICW was not thermobaric.
You are simply ridiculous!
Please study what Thermobaric and Airburst actually mean rather than what you think they mean. In very simple terms Airburst is a mechanism of
detonation. Thermobaric implies the type of detonation. You really cant compare the two.
What you need to wrap your head around is that fact that the OICW program though originally was intended to develop the XM29 grenade launcher that
fired 20mm HE shells, in 2004 when it was canceled they split the program into three increments. The First increment was to continue developing a
lightweight carbine, the second increment was to continue to develop the grenade launcher that fired the HE-AB munitions (which resulted in the XM25,
M320, XM109, XM307) and the third increment was to combine both the first increment and the second increment. Now, the 20mm HEAB has been discontinued
as you have asserted but the 25mm standalone HE AB launcher the XM25 is being developed and is considered quite successful! That technology was
developed with the help of technology and experience gained from the OICW program.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Or the M203 replacement they now developed called the M320 ?? Yes, what useless work indeed!
Which is a 40mm impact-fuse grenade system. Not a 20mm airburst munition. AGAIN proving that the 20mm idea has been well and truly shelved.
My point was that, contrary to your claim that the OICW program was utterly a waste of resources, the M320 being an offshoot of that program is a
viable alternative to a present day system- the M203.
As for the AirBurst munitions, they have continued to develop them, except in a 25mm version in the XM25 rather than a 20 mm version like in the XM29;
which was rejected.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
A range finger detects the distance to a target ONLY.
Not windage, not correct azimuth for launch and sometimes it is necessary even when using a range finder to guesstimate, as it's preferred to explode
a grenade a few metres overhead of a target to shower soldiers that are behind cover (which was the original purpose of the 20mm airburst).
That is totally incorrect! You have a surprising ability to state totally false information with great alacrity.
The whole point of the HE-AirBurst munition is the ability to calculate the exact point of detonation be they point, area or defilade. This is done
through a Target acquisition/Fire control system. This is where the laser rangefinder comes into the picture. The soldier "paints" a target and
activates the laser rangefinder. The TA/FC system calculates the ballistics and provides an adjusted aimpoint for the target. The soldier then adjusts
his aim to center on the target. The TA/FC system provides this information to the air burst grenade and on its way down range measures the distance
traveled and bursts precisely at the right point. This is how airburst munitions work and thats how they are delivered.
Your absurd claim of calculating windage and azimuth is ridiculous for an infantry weapon. They are not artillery or mortars, it is a mere grenade
launcher!
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
That's cute. You think the military actually cares about human life.
As if your naivety couldn't become anymore blatant.
Maybe that's why they are spending Billions on the Future Force Warrior program and on other such programs to secure and equip individual
soldiers.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Try comparing that to the cost of an M-4 or M-16, which even with the SOPMOD kit, comes down to less than a few hundred dollars per soldier.
Which is the primary concern at hand for the DOD.
These statements make no sense what-so-ever. Compare what to the M4 and the M16 ? You do realize that the M4 was inducted relatively recently into the
Army dont you ?
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Yes and what are these ramjets being proposed for?
Hypersonic spy planes and bombers. The two programmes are intrinsically linked, as Blackswift cannot function without the success of the X-51
demonstrator to prove Ramjet engines are viable.
Again you are utterly and thoroughly ignorant of what you are saying.
The X-51 is a SCRAMJET not a ramjet. There is a MASSIVE difference. Please read up. Next, the main intention behind the X-51 as I have stated
previously but obviously your mind couldnt comprehend it, was the Prompt Global Strike program. Please look it up.
Finally, the X-51 is an small pilot-less vehicle that is meant to simulate SCRAMJET technology for a cruise missile like object. To design a piloted
vehicle like a bomber or a "spy plane" as you fantasize about would need much much more work and a much larger test program unlike the X-51.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
It's a proof of concept initiative to show the USAF, who has been highly sceptical of ramjet-powered aircraft, that it's feasible and
practical.
More of the same here!
Firstly, the USAF has tested RAMJETS in the 50's and they worked beautifully then. In fact the SR-71 itself had a Fan-assisted RAMJET engine. Also,
they are testing SCRAMJET engines on the X-51 program, which are completely different in scope and complexity.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
My god. The only thing Iraq & Afghanistan have strengthened is the notion that the US is incapable of fighting asymmetric warfare and all the fancy
gizmos and high-tech research projects in the world cannot substitute for a bulky, disorganised and less-than-mobile military force.
Your statements are typically outrageously ignorant and utterly fallacious.
The US military has proved effectively today as witnessed by the whole world how advanced technology like the MQ-9 reapers and the thermobaric
XM1060's etc have allowed the US to fight and WIN a highly asymmetrical war against aggressive opponents in treacherous terrain. The fact that the US
can deploy rapidly to any corner of the world and fight even highly asymmetric battles effectively has proven the real strength and versatility of the
US military.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Sure they do, who will never want to complete another tour of duty once is Iraq & Afghanistan is over and done with.
Such is the mindset of people who never experience combat, however.
Please do not try to assume what you know of me. Unlike you I am not an armchair general who doesnt even have an educated guess as to what the
military is.
Do you know how many soldiers have volunteered for a second tour or a third? Tell them, about your asinine theories about what they will or wont
do!!
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
www.commondreams.org...
Oh yeah definitely. A public, whom 70% of disagrees with the Iraq war is just dying to get blown up by an IED. I can see the logic in your argument
there.
Firstly,CommonDreams is a ridiculous source and moreover that article is outdated. Secondly, here is a current article about military recruitment that
should alleviate at least some of your ignorance.
Baltimore
Sun
Lastly, there is greater support for the war in Iraq and Afghanistan in America today with greater progress being made. Current disapproval for the
surge in Afghanistan is a mere 38% according to one poll by Pew Research Center(
Reuters
)
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Like you have a damn clue. You do realise the Tamils originate from India? And have their own, self-designated state, Tamil Nadu, in Southern
India:
Of course I have a clue. Unlike you I keep myself well informed of current events and so far the Tamils in India have not had any "insurgency" as
you claim. An insurgent would imply a person who takes part in an armed rebellion against the state. The Tamils have not taken part in any armed
rebellion against the Indian state. It is the Sri Lankan Tamils that have done so.
[edit on 14-4-2009 by IAF101]