It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
As for the X-51 and Blackswift projects, the X-51 is a scientific and technological demonstrator which has still not been canceled because despite the ignorance in Washington, NASA and DARPA know the importance of investing in this kind of viable technological initiatives which are essential if America is to secure its future
Way to contradict yourself:
Finally it makes ZERO sense to have an SR-71 replacement in this day and age. Do you know what the SR-71 was used for ? Why do we even need to use such primitive methods these days when US satellites
You do realise the purpose of Blackswift/X-51 is a hypersonic spyplane?
Go and learn the meaning of consistency then try and make your straw-man arguements.
n a letter dated 27 September 2005, the US Air Force (HQ USAF/XPPE) officially granted the US Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Propulsion Directorate’s scramjet flight test vehicle the designation X-51A. Since the introduction of the legendary X-1 in 1946, scientists have used the X-plane designations to identify experimental aircraft and rockets used to explore new aerospace technologies. The Propulsion Directorate was working with Pratt & Whitney (P&W)/Rocketdyne’s Space Propulsion Division and Boeing’s Transformational Space Systems Division to design the X-51A scramjet powered flight vehicle to explore the airbreathing system-level potential of scramjets.
The military-oriented endothermically fueled, scramjet engine flight demonstrator (EFSEFD) was initiated in early 2003. At that time the first test flight was planned for late 2006. If successful, 5-11 flights could be performed, with as many as four more following over a roughly 18-month period, and the rest, 18 months after that. These test flights differ significantly from those of NASA's X-43C. In the latter, a three-flowpath scramjet module featuring variable-geometry inlets will be flown, with the flowpaths mounted in a side-by-side configuration. In contrast, the test vehicles used to explore scramjet military uses will each be powered by a single scramjet sporting a fixed-geometry inlet.
X-51 is a TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATOR. It's not planned to go into production, and it's not in the black budget.
I'm a lot more inclined to believe her than I am the newspaper or someone not involved with them in any way saying that it's canceled.
How does a technology demonstrator that isn't in the black budget and hasn't even flown yet denote a failure?
So when it comes to fighter jets, the U.S. still has massive superiority against any other nation. The only country that sort of comes close is India, and it is extremely unlikely that India will ever be siding with Russia or China against the U.S.
Even if India were to gain a higher number of SU-30's, they still can't fly them across the pacific to attack us, they aren't long range attack vehicles.
And Blackswift is also rumored to be a BOMBER.
Again, tell me how it's BAD to have a hypersonic bomber with a 2 hour worldwide strike capability.
Satellites aren't flexible enough and they weren't getting the intel they needed without the SRs flying anymore.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
I'm not sure what your definition of "success" entails, but when it's regarding a military project, success would entail that project entering current service and mass production.
NONE. Not one of those projects has yet to enter current serivce.
6 of those were CANCELLED, before anything more than a prototype was built.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
How could they save lives if they were never deployed and used by men in Iraq or Afghanistan?
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Approved in an extremely limited adoption. From the proposed DD-21's 20 or so new destroyers and littoral combat ships to 3 destroyers, for $3.5 billion dollars per unit. A hair's breadth away from a brand-new Nimitz-Class carrier at $4.5 billion.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Now that's an excellent tradeoff. A puny destroyer, with 2, 155mm deck guns, 20 VLS Tomahawk modules and the provision to carry 2 Seahawk helicopters. With the added gimmick of "stealth".
Versus a floating armada of 85 aircraft.......
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Uh no, it won't.
The Commanche was a recon helicopter that could perform limited pin-point strikes. It had nowhere near the durability, survivability, range of armaments or tonnage of the Apache.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
It led to proving that 20mm airburst munitions are useless on the battlefield and have nowhere near the lethality of 40mm M203 grenades.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
It also showed no matter how many fancy range-finding computers you mount on a battle rifle, it doesn't make the ordinary soldier any more efficient.
Any gains seen in targeting abilities are outweighed by such a bulky (8.2 kilograms loaded), cumbersome and difficult to use weapon (setting range, windage and azimuth before firing every grenade on a real battlefield gets you killed).
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Not to mention, the unit cost of $10,000 dollars per soldier.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
In February, the programme was cancelled by the army despite the expenditure of USD2 billion over 10 years. A report from the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) has urged the army to "review its decision to terminate the Land Warrior programme" and has earmarked USD80 million to resurrect it.
It's end-goal was supposed to be realised sometime around 2032. It spent $2 billion in ten years, and almost none of that technology has transferred to current issue gear.
Oh it looked very promising didn't it?
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Way to contradict yourself:
Finally it makes ZERO sense to have an SR-71 replacement in this day and age. Do you know what the SR-71 was used for ? Why do we even need to use such primitive methods these days when US satellites
You do realise the purpose of Blackswift/X-51 is a hypersonic spyplane?
Go and learn the meaning of consistency then try and make your straw-man arguements.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
The XM2001 Crusader project again, can hardly be dubbed as a "failure". The main contention with the program was the high cost per unit compared to existing weapons systems.
Sure it can, READ:
www.senate.gov...
Army Technology
. In August 2002, United Defense received the formal termination which ends all further work on the program. United Defense has been awarded a contract to use technologies developed for the Crusader program to produce a lighter and more deployable Objective Force Cannon or Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) cannon. "Objective Force" is the working title for the US Army's long-term future combat force. The NLOS cannon is planned to be fielded in 2009.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
I'm still waiting to see any of these "promising technologies" actually realised after years in development and billions funnelled into them. Especially after they've been cancelled.
Maybe you're just a very patient, slow-paced individual and that's all well and good for you.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
But when you've got 2 wars slowly leeching the lifeblood of the military away and costing trillions per year, you need all the help you can get, right away.
Not sitting around waiting for DARPA or Skunkworks to come up with a miracle by 2020 or something.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Who do you think is going to be fighting your megalomaniac desires for you in the future?
It sure as hell won't be the detached, armchair-generals such as yourself nor will it be the upper crusts of the America.
It'll be the poor, tired and underprivileged as always.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Or maybe it's because of 15 years of red-tape and failed programmes that have yet to produce a satisfactory successor?
Sheesh, it's never the military's fault is it? These guys are infallible.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
India falls at about 3rd to 4th place in terms of foreign air powers the US could clash with.
Russia, China, (insert in here Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan) are well ahead of India's fleet.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
The only thing the Indian airforce has going for it currently are the Su-30MKI deals with Russia (of which only 110 are in service), the Indian MRCA Competition for which Russia is the front runner with it's MiG-35, which they will be licenced to produce and it's Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft project coordinated with Russia.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
The rest of it is a very aged and poorly-trained force. Their 39 Mirages and 56 MiG-29's are fast becoming obsolete.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
India's primary focus strategically is Islamic Fundamentalism, Tamil insurgency, Pakistani relations and Chinese interference.
Obviously, none of them have entered current service because they are ALL research projects to determine and develop future technologies.
If it were DARPA would be a state owned manufacturing unit not a research entity.
You mean like the Thermobaric weapons that were extensively used in Iraq to penetrate structures and kill hundreds of insurgents??
Or the M203 replacement they now developed called the M320 ?? Yes, what useless work indeed!
In the first paragraph you accuse them of putting range-finding computers on something you call a "battle" rifle and in the second you say the soldier has to "set" range, windage and azimuth ?? That doesnt make any sense. Why would he have to set anything if already has a "fancy range-finding computer" as you called it ?
The idea that every project will yield a practical application is utterly foolish and naive.
The Objective Individual Combat Weapon or OICW was the next-generation service rifle competition that was under development as part of the United States Army OICW program; the program was eventually discontinued without bringing the weapon out of the prototype phase.
Though, it couldnt deliver the weapon it promised it
What you dont seem to even comprehend is that $10,000 is peanuts compared to an American life!
The X-51 is a technology demonstrator for SCRAM jet technologies and hypersonic flight.
"The Falcon Blackswift flight demonstration vehicle will be powered by a combination turbine engine and ramjet, an all-in-one power plant. The turbine engine accelerates the vehicle to around Mach 3 before the ramjet takes over and boosts the vehicle up to Mach 6."
The simple fact that it was planned to be tested from a B52 should have clued you into the fact that it was merely a technology demonstrator validating technologies rather than your own fantastical assumptions.
The two wars have only strengthened the US military and has made it more versatile than ever before and much more potent.
Today our military has "thousands upon thousands" of vetran soldiers and commanders
Next, the US military today is getting more recruits than ever, recruitment numbers are up all across the board with thousands interested in joining the ranks of the US military.
The recruiting shortfalls for the Army Reserve and National Guard - which have been called to active duty at a pace unseen since World War II and now make up more than 40 percent of American forces in Iraq - are as bad as or worse than those for the active Army.
If the shortfalls continue, the government could be forced eventually to consider abandoning the nation's 32-year experiment with the all-volunteer military, which came into being as the United States withdrew from an unpopular war in Vietnam and ended an unpopular draft.
The shortfall in recruits also is making it harder for the Army to raise its total strength from 480,000 to 510,000 soldiers so it can man the new modular brigades that are at the heart of the plans for a lighter, more flexible force.
Tamil insurgency ? That would be Sri Lanka that has the Tamil insurgence.
Since the 1969 election victory of DMK under C. N. Annadurai, Tamil nationalism has been a permanent feature of the government of Tamil Nadu.
Originally posted by USamf
Yes by all means gut the military and cancel all future programs. NOT. We do that and before you know it we will have to be playing catch up with China and Russia. I will gladly pay for my country to be the most advanced in the world. In case you didn't know, no one has been able to handle those teenagers, not the Soviets in the 80's and not us now.
[edit on 11-4-2009 by USamf]
With this in mind, and the reality that very one want to join the army right, more money being spent on weapons development should be spent on soldiers, raising pay and benefits, and paying for college after completion of tours of duty. We would be far better off investing in our service members than these hugely costly weapons systems.