It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wikipedia renames 9/11 controlled demolition page to a "conspiracy theory"

page: 1
5

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 10 2009 @ 08:04 PM
link   

Wikipedia renames 9/11 controlled demolition page to a "conspiracy theory"


911debunkers.blogspot.com

en.wikipedia.org...

Page History
(cur) (prev) 21:40, 5 April 2009 Jehochman (talk contribs) m (55,220 bytes) (moved Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center to World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories: Rename article per talk page discussion) (undo)

It used to be called a hypothesis now its been downgraded to a conspiracy theory. Right around the release of the thermitic material paper as well; which there was a debate about whether or not to mention.

hy·poth·e·sis (hī-pŏth’ĭ-sĭs) n. pl. hy·poth·e·ses (-sēz’)
A tentative explanation for an observation, phenomenon, or scientific problem that can be tested by further investigation.

conspiracy theory n.
A theory seeking to explain a disputed case or matter as a plot by a secret group or alliance rather than an individual or isolated act.

By simply looking at the definitions it is clear that the proponents of the demolition theory are not proposing a “conspiracy theory”, they are proposing a hypothesis. Stephen Jones, Richard Gage and other technical 9/11 researchers have never directly pointed the finger at anyone. They simply criticise the official theories for the destruction the towers and look for alternative explanations. They are therefore not conspiracy theorists. Furthermore, everything about the official story of 9/11 fits the definition of a conspiracy theory.
(visit the link for the full news article)

[edit on 10-4-2009 by News And History]




posted on Apr, 10 2009 @ 08:04 PM
link   
That's just more evidence that shows Wikipedia is being controlled by governments & their minions, on a daily basis. The general-population has so many alternative reference-websites to visit though.

We should have no doubt that most of the "popular" websites that get TV-news coverage & earn the governments' approval are really just media-outlets controlled by the military industrial complex & their wealthy masters.

We know the government lies & controls websites like that.

Don't question your government or else


911debunkers.blogspot.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Apr, 10 2009 @ 09:07 PM
link   
Damn you internet for bending over and taking it in the arse from large organisations.



posted on Apr, 10 2009 @ 09:18 PM
link   
i've never been a fan of wikipedia

but i know people who rely on it for there source of information, don't they realize that its user submitted?



posted on Apr, 10 2009 @ 09:41 PM
link   
Wikipedia isn't controlled by the government, it is governed by a bureaucracy comprised of veteran Wikipedia users that have been elected by other Wikipedia users.

The change of name for the title of the article was apparently decided in this discussion:
en.wikipedia.org...:World_Trade_Center_controlled_demolition_conspiracy_theories#Recommend_renaming_this_article



posted on Apr, 10 2009 @ 10:21 PM
link   
It seems like the government has most of the control at that website, as well as the huge government-controlled corporations, which helped develop it & financially support it.



posted on Apr, 12 2009 @ 11:29 AM
link   
Well - it is a conspiracy theory as is Bush's silly explanation about 19 stone-age arabs who hate our freedom.



posted on Apr, 12 2009 @ 12:24 PM
link   
Wikipedia is a crap source of information.
All too often the Nazi-moderators will "adjust" the information submitted to present their own point of view, or to reflect their own agenda. There is no ability for you, to question or contest their decisions. The concept is based on a good ideal, but the implementation of that concept is seriously flawed.

It's strange that the 911 demolition theory is considered conspiracy and shunted to the far edges of the spectrum of believability, but the highly improbable "official" version is considered fact.

Given the nature of human beings, I'm frankly surprised that we have made it this far as a species. If you would like to have a quick look at the nature of humans today, you only have to review Craigslists R&R section for a week or so, in almost any city.

The reason the Govt. can shove blatantly erroneous information down our throats is because we as a people are far too afraid of actually having to deal with what is obviously the truth. It is far easier to keep our collective heads in the sand, our butts in the air and get what's coming to us, than it is to disrupt our "idyllic" lives.

Well, the USA used to be a powerful, wealthy country that was the envy of the entire world. At one time, you had dollars, today with Obama, you have "change"

Thanks for reading.
..Ex



new topics

top topics



 
5

log in

join