This topic is in the Aircraft Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


3 engine aircraft




Topic started on 22-4-2004 @ 08:15 PM by machinegunjordan


have any 3 engine fighter jets ever been built or tested in the past or present just wanderin



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-4-2004 @ 08:16 PM by masterofpuppets


that might be alittle in-efficiant(sorry about my horrible spelling)



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-4-2004 @ 08:17 PM by cmdrkeenkid


probably. normally though, they're built with only one or two engines, due to weight and manueverability.

by the way, you should have consolidated this into your other thread.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-4-2004 @ 08:18 PM by machinegunjordan


ok i was just wanderin if it was attempted or anything i figured it would be inefficient



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-4-2004 @ 03:20 AM by Amet Khan


There are no fighter aircraft with three jet engines all of the same type, however there are plenty of 3 engined transports and a few 3 engine bombers.

I can think of only two 3-engined jet fighters-

Yakovlev Yak-41 / Yak-141
Nato designation "Freestyle"
V/STOL multirole fighter, rather similar to JSF. Project is struggling on small budget, and not really going anywhere now. Some Yak-141 people jumped ship to work on JSF, while Yakovlev themselves are entertaining investors in South America and Asia to continue Yak-141 development.
engines:
1 x Kobchenko/Soyuz R-79V-300
2 x Glushenko/Rybinsk RD-41

Yakovlev Yak-36MP / Yak-38
Nato designation "Forger"
VTOL naval strike aircraft. Approximately 230 built. Operational on Kiev class light carriers and the Admiral Gorshkov. Essentially retired since 1993 as Russian Navy no longer has carriers at sea.
engines:
1 x Tumansky/Soyuz R-27V-300 (typical) or 1 x Lyulka AL-21 (only Yak-38I)
2 x Koliesov RD-36-35FV(Yak-36M), RD-36-35FVR(Yak-38)

Yak V/STOL history: Les Yakovlev à décollage vertical

Yak-141:
external image

Yak-38:
external image

Both:
external image



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-4-2004 @ 03:22 AM by Flanker


yak-141 was also the FIRST ssupersonic VSTOL aircraft in the world.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-4-2004 @ 03:24 AM by Shugo



Originally posted by Amet Khan
There are no fighter aircraft with three jet engines all of the same type


I wouldn't say that... though I can't imagine that happening. 1,2,4,5,6,8 are the common engine amounts actually.

With Pulse Detonation Wave... you almost only need 1 or 2. I do not think 3 engines will occur.

However... different typ like you said... there are planes with different types of engines on board... but, none of them have 3.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-4-2004 @ 03:31 AM by Amet Khan



Originally posted by Flanker
yak-141 was also the FIRST ssupersonic VSTOL aircraft in the world.


No, not really. You ignore that the BAe Sea Harrier can reach Mach 1.3 in a dive in clean configuration. A prepared Yak-38 also reached Mach 1.2 in a dive.

Yak-141 is however the first VSTOL aircraft to accelerate through Mach 1 in level flight, with a top speed of M 1.65.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-4-2004 @ 05:23 PM by machinegunjordan


ok thinks for posting this stuff

al ot of this stuff i didnt know but i wasnt talkin bout big aircraft that have their engines on their wings



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-4-2004 @ 05:49 PM by Stuey1221




al ot of this stuff i didnt know but i wasnt talkin bout big aircraft that have their engines on their wings



You mean planes like the B-2 Bomber which has 8 jet engines, 4 on each wing in groups of 2??
www.darklair.com...

Several were stationed at an RAF Base in the UK at the begining of the Iraqi War



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-4-2004 @ 05:53 PM by machinegunjordan


u mean the b-52 not the b-2 but the b-52 is wat imean exactly thats wat i wasnt talkin about



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-4-2004 @ 05:56 PM by silQ


those r pretty cool planes......
but i'd say that the sr-71 blackbird is sexier!
awwww yea.......



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-4-2004 @ 05:58 PM by machinegunjordan


silq how come when ever we talk about aircraft u are always bringin up the blackbird and then talkin about how sexy it is u r obsessed with that u should get a tattoo of the blackbird



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-4-2004 @ 06:46 PM by devilwasp


mabye he need to go to blackbird rehab
hmm 3 engines never actully seen 1 well those old german planes with 3 probs but they were just weird



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-4-2004 @ 08:58 PM by Stuey1221


Hehe, cheers i meant the B-52 yeah, my apologies for reading wrong before n all my bad



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-4-2004 @ 09:04 PM by machinegunjordan


i understand man i make mistakes too we all do just pointin it out so u dont do it again



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-4-2004 @ 07:09 AM by Ouizel


Well, I think that a B-52 is sexy, but, then again, I worked on 'em in the Air Force. (That pic is of an H model, by the way. I worked on Gs.)

Back on topic, there are plenty of commercial and private 3 engine aircraft, but I don't know of any fighters off the top of my head.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:










































ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.114 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread