It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by budski
reply to post by HunkaHunka
In other words, yours is the view that is one sided.
What makes you think you know better than others what is or is not in their best interests?
Originally posted by Jay-in-AR
Yes, we need law. What we don't need is an oligarchy of power hungry, extremely wealthy eugenicists dictating not only how they are going to spend my money on the behalf of the irresponsibilities of another, but to cover that irresponsibility they are going to tax me so the system doesn't fail because of it.
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
What is one sided is assuming that the result isn't the will of the American People.
If you disagree with these types of bills, then by all means write your congressmen as well. If Schrodinger would have left it at "I disagree with these bills... and wish those voting for it would stop!", then that's fine... it's not a one sided view. It states his opinion and what he would like done about it, but it also recognizes, that there are other Americans, just like him, who are FOR this bill.
Originally posted by AccessDenied
So, the tax money goes to what?
Increased awareness of obesity and health problems?
Health care?
How about to the farmers who grow food that is actually good for us?
Don't tell me you are raising the price of something because it's bad for me and you want me to make healthier choices when Milk, and Juice costs DOUBLE THE PRICE for 2 litres.
I won't stop buying it.
Originally posted by SemperParatusRJCC
None of this makes any sense. Why are they going to tax soda. Can't I enjoy anything without it getting taxed to hell. First Jack Daniels, Then Marlboros, now soda. I work for the military. So I don't make nearly enough for all these taxes.
Originally posted by sos37
Personally I don't agree with the tax on tobacco or soft drinks but dammit people YOU DID THIS! Quit blaming those politicians who do this every single time and take some damn responsibility for the way you voted!
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
On the heels of the American public being hit with a massive tobacco tax increase, we now have this:
....NEWS....
For all those amongst us that thought that outrageous tobacco taxes ware a good idea principally because you didn't smoke, allow me to introduce you to the chickens knocking at your door, I believe it is roosting season.
What does this mean?
It means that we are being programmed to accept to pay more for things that the government deems "not good" for us.
And before you say, well it's only one cent per can, what difference does it make? Let me remind you that tobacco taxes were also at first very low.
Once this process begins there surely is no end to it.
Think off all the other products that could be taxed in such a fashion under this shaky premise, really, think about it.
Also think about the fact that they're not talking about taxing aspartame which likely causes a lot more harm than sugar.
We are looking forward to the government legislating all our choices for us.
Smokers and drinkers knew it first, now the rest will know.
[edit on 9 Apr 2009 by schrodingers dog]
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
Originally posted by sos37
Personally I don't agree with the tax on tobacco or soft drinks but dammit people YOU DID THIS! Quit blaming those politicians who do this every single time and take some damn responsibility for the way you voted!
*sigh*
So you think politicians run this country?
Originally posted by Harlowe JNkinz
If "they" are going to raise taxes on items that are potentially hazardous to consume, "they" need to lower taxes for items that are known to be "good for us"...