It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Pictures of UFOs

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Apr, 9 2009 @ 06:22 AM
its not venus..

Not atmospheric distortion what so ever

do you own a telescope?

if that is venus in costa rica it shout be top rigt hand of the moon not lower left.

more so coz i posted a picture of venus from my telescope in a thread on ats.

Nuff said.. its not venuse its inside our atmosphear.. no wobble what so ever..

didnt mean to be so abrubt mate, i should have sent a u2u as my name is missleading to alot of friend inculding yourself

so i shall say sorry for any missunderstanding

[edit on 9-4-2009 by symmetricAvenger]

posted on Apr, 9 2009 @ 06:30 AM
reply to post by symmetricAvenger

Ah, excuse me to not acknowledge the second video was the same person's video.

Interesting, at the least!

One thing that bothers me, is where is Venus, he should of made Venus visible to disclose that from being a possibility, however, it's not.

So now, result(good friend), you await the bombings of real skeptics.

posted on Apr, 9 2009 @ 06:35 AM
reply to post by Revolution-2012

hehe tust me my friend we are both here to kick skeptics butts

; )

posted on Apr, 9 2009 @ 06:37 AM
reply to post by symmetricAvenger

Always and forever

yeeee, not a one liner.

posted on Apr, 9 2009 @ 06:51 AM
reply to post by Revolution-2012

and an immortal tech fan

Point of no return or cause of death?

; )))

posted on Apr, 9 2009 @ 12:19 PM
Rev: While I believe there were indeed UFOs in Phoenix the night that video you posted was taken, that particular video is a video of flares.

But regardless, there are plenty of 'clear' pictures of UFOs. Typically goes like this: Blurry photo: Must be something we know about, but the blurry photo distorted it. Clear photo: It's obviously a hoax! That's many people's mindset.

Nowadays, unfortunately, it's much harder to prove your photo is real, since it's so much easier to hoax it.

posted on Apr, 9 2009 @ 12:24 PM
There are actually quite a few very good photos of UFOs out there that aren't all that grainy or out of focus, and we've had them for decades. Look around. Check out the McMinville and Helfin photos. They're are good as any ever taken.

They're interesting. And even if we give the photographer the benefit of the doubt and accept that they aren't hoaxes, they still don't offer much in the way of identifying what these things are. Time ships? Aliens? Secret government aircraft? Physical manifestations of a collective unconscious? Nobody knows.

Images are just images. Evidence, but not proof of anything.

[edit on 9-4-2009 by Nohup]

posted on Apr, 9 2009 @ 12:56 PM
As soon as any high quality pictures come to light debunkers run screaming FAKE! Photoshopped! Hollywood!

And for the most part I think they are right but every so often something comes down the pike that is either real of simply misidentified.

Simply because we see few high quality pictures of ufos does not mean they are real or fake.

Here are some good quality pictures. Most have been debunked or misidentified.

[edit on 9-4-2009 by SLAYER69]

posted on Apr, 9 2009 @ 02:38 PM
this post has started to become a little off-topic.

anyway.... nothing yet has been proven to me, or answered.

i want to make it clear that I do in fact believe in some sort of an ET presence. it's just, i really find it hard to believe that if UFOs are buzzing around the planet this regularly, how NO ONE has managed a decent pic, especially considering the quality of photo technology in this day and age.

and like i said, taking some grainy, low quality pictures in your backyard proves NOTHING except that you can't take pictures.

posted on Apr, 9 2009 @ 02:52 PM

Originally posted by sdfws
this post has started to become a little off-topic.

anyway.... nothing yet has been proven to me, or answered.

Great post by the way....

But if you expect people to prove to you anything then I think your ego is a tad too big.

Do some leg work and find your own answers

If however you want to have an open and frank discussion then you have come to the right place.



posted on Apr, 9 2009 @ 03:30 PM
reply to post by sdfws

Wow I knew he would be pounced on.

But seriously, I could show you a perfect pic of a UFO and you still wouldn't believe its a good picture. Lol do some work yourself!!! If you want to debunk everyone then put your back into it. Do some research, search the web, interview people, read a book!!!! Heck you could even post up outside until one does a fly by.

[edit on 9-4-2009 by DaMod]

posted on Apr, 9 2009 @ 03:56 PM
reply to post by sdfws

There are some good pics here:
And some interesting footage on this one:

posted on Apr, 9 2009 @ 04:09 PM
reply to post by sdfws

well in my opinon i think there is some kind of "field" around the UFO's. Maybe a cloaking device, or even a shield, that protects the UFO from attacks. That could definately be a reason everything else may be clear except the UFO.

posted on Apr, 9 2009 @ 10:08 PM
it gets taxing dealing with people who need "absolute evidence" maybe im a sucker in the money realm, but have you seen the lake erie video? STS missions. and beside there not unidentified, there identified now professionaly and corporate as exotic craft i believe

This include any resonant or rotating field air/space craft, maybe even ion propulsions?

Either way i want a friggn space ship, lets go see jumpiter.

posted on Apr, 9 2009 @ 11:54 PM
reply to post by fleabit

Supposedly the story goes that the military let off a diversion of flares for the real UFO, which only creates more conspiracy.

There is video of those same 'flares' moving towards each other and disappearing, I saw it on UFO Hunters, they are mystified by that situation as much as Bentwaters.

As to the OP, Read my signature, bottom quote. Compelling, at the least, that someone of scientific nature would propose we don't need a rational explanation of everything, isn't it?

Explain to me, how it is you expect to find a rational explanation, or rational picture, of something that is not rational, and can be 'debunked' or 'identified' at just as easy as the cause of it being irrational, your limited thought processes will not get you far in the eyes of the believers, because many of us do not believe 80% of the UFO reports and pictures, however we search to find, and defend the ones that cannot be explained by a simple Chinese lantern. Many skeptics have admitted they do not know what certain pictures were, and typically resort to how they could have been photoshopped/CGIed. In search of a Picture of a UFO, I'd recommend to you you stop looking, or stop paradeing that there is none, because none of us can present a picture of a real UFO, even if it is real, the only picture you'll get of one is if it's reality, not a high definition color printout.

posted on Apr, 10 2009 @ 04:53 AM
reply to post by Revolution-2012

hey rev!


I spoke to the guy who was on the disclosure project!! we had a beer n stuff LOL i was like omg!!!

:p hes honest about it all his names larry something. aint seen him @ my drinking hole in ages.. he knows jim marrs aswell !!

posted on Apr, 11 2009 @ 11:17 AM
Some good images on this video:


posted on Apr, 13 2009 @ 04:33 PM
Belgium triangle photograph:

Taken by doctor in Tavernes,France 1974:

More pics:

[edit on 02/10/08 by karl 12]

top topics

<< 1   >>

log in