There is a difference between myth and history. What you have presented here is a very good and very fake myth.
There is not that much difference. Ancient history is called mythology because it describes things that modern historians cannot accept, such as the
existence of places like Atlantis, or the intercourse between humans beings and civilisations from space, or the descriptions of advanced technology
and unknown creatures.
Your presentation of languages, first, makes one cringe. "Italic" is not a language chain. We have "Romance" languages that descend from
Latin. Latin is an amalgam language from Greek and Phonecian. Phonecian was also one of the principle languages in the formation of ancient
I am simply telling you what the research shows. They all belong to the same family known as Indo-European. I presented a diagram earlier showing they
are all linked.
Going back, there is a theory that states that there is an ancient, and lost, Indo-European language. This is only a linguistic theory. Even in
this case, there is no proof that this was a spoken language by two random groups of mystical ancients.
I agree it a Linguistics theory, but a widely accepted one, because the Indo-European languages all share a common ancestor. Linguists say this is
PIE, but in actual fact this language is Sanskrit. All of the Indo-European languages broke off from Sanskrit. This can be shown through the oldest of
the languages such as Lithuanian which originated from around the Himalayas. This is confirmed by an ATS member who has been in correspondence with me
whose main area of research is into Lithuanian culture, and he shares his research with me that his cultural records indeed do show that his ancestors
originated in the Himalayas. This is also consistent with my research.
The reason PIE was fabricated was because early Indologists could not accept Sanskrit was the root language of all Indo-European languages, and
constructed an artificial and false language known as PIE.
If these ancients were destroyed in a cataclysm, where is the proof? Where are the fossils/remains? Where are the ruins of their
I strongly recommend you read Graham Hancock's, "Underworld" there is plenty of proof or urban cultures found submerged up to 11,000 years ago.
There were deluges all over the world around 10,000 years ago which lead to the destruction of civilisation.
I could certainly get behind the theory that there was an advanced civilization that existed during the more primitive period in human
development. Evidence for this has to do with ancient megalithic structures and astrological-astronomical texts. However, this, in no way, proves the
existence of two factions that engaged in a battle. Likewise, there is no proof of extra-terrestrial influence.
The ancient Sanskrit texts talk about the constant wars that went on between the Devas and the Asuras. There is some evidence to connect the Asuras to
the Sumerians. All my research has shown me that the NWO ancestory begins in Sumeria where the Abrahmic religion is started as a form of ideological
control by the Illojim, in complete contrast to the Aryan religion, which is about nobility, freedom and democracy. Then this Sumerian linage
gradually begins to persecute the Aryan traditions throughout Indo-Europe, the early evidence of this is with the Romans. From that point on you can
see a more or less perfect continuity from the the Romans to the Americans.
They deliberately persecuted the Aryans and covered-up the Aryan heritage. Even to this very date Aryan heritage is kept hidden and has also been
Now, I am sure there are some coverups with history, but, are you asserting that this untold mythic history is some massive global conspiracy?
How many people must be in on this if there are no leaks?
I commend you for writing a great story, and, if you're right, I will be very impressed.
Yes, there has been a massive global conspiracy to hide our real history - our Aryan heritage from the previous civilisation. There are leaks, if
there were not, I would not be able to learn about it. This cover-up really stated around 2000 years ago with the Roman Empire. They attempted to
delete all records of the Aryan teachings, for example, deleting all the records of the interaction between the Indians and the Greeks, and also
persecuting the Greeks. The truth is, the proto-Greeks had come from India around 1900BCE, and hence why older Indian records refer to them. They
appeared in Greece and started teaching about Philosophy. This is why there are similarities between Indian Philosophy and Greek Philosophy.
Later, Jesus, tried to restore the old Aryan religion in the Middle East, but we all know that Jesus went through much trials and tribulations and was
persecuted and then crucified by the Abrahmic religion and by the tyranny of the Romans. The earliest form of Christianity he left behind, Gnostic
Christianity, was practically identical with the Aryan religion, but then Paul distorted his teachings and established the Church. The Church was
created as powerful system of ideological control, and the Romans noting its potential adopted this as their state religion, while simutaneously
persecuting the original Christians, most of whom fled to Egypt.
Thereafter the Roman empire spread Christianity throughout Europe destroying all the Aryan traditions that remained there(Pagans). After the Aryan
traditions that remained in Arabia were destroyed by the Muslims. They were far more brutal than the Romans. Their biggest conquest was the capture of
Mecca and the Kabba temple, which was an ancient Aryan temple and the chief deity which was worshipped there was Shiva. Then they massacred all the
Aryans and demolished all the Aryan temples throughout Arabia. It was not long until the Muslims marched into India itself(the Aryan homeland) and
subjugated the North, again destroying every trace of Aryan culture, with more impunity than the Romans.
As the Muslim rule waned over India with the rise of the Maharatas and the Rajpuats, the British took over, capitalising on the instability and
internal conflict. The hardest blow came from the British to Aryan culture. The British systematically began to supplant the Aryan culture with
"Western" culture by criminalizing the traditional Aryan culture of India and abolishing traditional educational and knowledge systems. They then
began to distort the Aryan teachings by deliberately misinterpreting them and demonizing them, trying to make them look savage and primitive. This
embedded an inferiority complex into Indians, who never really recovered from it and completely rejected their own Aryan culture.
The conquest over the Aryan motherland spelled the end of Aryan culture and established domination of Western, what really is Sumerian culture. From
that point on we know what followed, the West began to globalize and has now control of the entire world.
Aryan culture saw a resurgence with Ramakrishna and Swami Vivekananda around the 19th century, which lead to the birth of Theosophy in the West.
Since, theosophy has morphed into the new-age culture and is gaining in power and influence over the world. The Sumerian masters know that more and
more people are awakening to their Aryan heritage, and this is why they plan to put a stop to this through depopulation.
[edit on 23-4-2009 by Indigo_Child]