It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jack Jouett
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
You really don't have a firm grasp on the way things work in Washington.
Somebody at L3 Communications said, "Hey, how can we get in on the national security scare tactics that are storming the country?" I know, we have a lot of high-tchnology, let's integrate into a program which does absolutely nothing, but intrudes on peoples rights. Let me get Senator Headuphisass on the phone, we own him." And that thing get's done.
Senator Headuphisass get's campaign contributions, L3 Communications get a lucrative contract, and the TSA get's the illusion that they are doing something about the canard known as terrorism.
Everybody is happy, except the citizenry who get the shaft. Oh, sorry, the sheeple who like this get to pound their chests at the invisible terrists.
[edit on 8-4-2009 by Jack Jouett]
Originally posted by Jack Jouett
reply to post by Zaphod58
Did you look at the image I posted? You can see that woman's gluteal cleft, her bossom is clearly outlined and you can see her pubis mons. Not to mention the fact that the nipples have been airbrushed out. When the governemnt of United States of America sent a child through that machine they were engaging in child pornography. That is the definition as laid out by the government itself.
Originally posted by Jack Jouett
reply to post by Helig
Probably causes cancer too, but no biggie, as long as the so called terrists don't win. What was their goal? Oh yeah, it was to take away or freedom.
[edit on 8-4-2009 by Jack Jouett]
Originally posted by Jack Jouett
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
You think that child porn is silly? Wow. You must not have kids.
Originally posted by Jack Jouett
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
Not according to prosecutors in Virginia, they felt an underage girl wearing a towel and covering her breasts with her arms constitutes child pornography. So, you'd be wrong on that one.
?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
There are a LOT of things that a checkpoint x-ray can barely detect, or can't detect that these machines will detect.
Originally posted by Jack Jouett
However, ever single person getting onto a plane at these airports has to go through the embarassment of going through that machine. This country has become ridiculous. Those who would give up liberty in favor of security deserve neither.
Originally posted by Jack Jouett
reply to post by Helig
Id on't know why you even brought up probability. A terrorist attack on an airplane id highly unlikely. However, ever single person getting onto a plane at these airports has to go through the embarassment of going through that machine. This country has become ridiculous. Those who would give up liberty in favor of security deserve neither.