AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Weaponry discussion forum.  (rss)


Navy's Big Weakness: Our Aircraft Carriers Are (Expensive) Defenseless Sitting Ducks!


<<  5    6    7    8  >>



reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 01:01 AM by rogue1


Originally posted by punkinworks
reply to post by skyeyes



Yah,

SM3



Impessive if the satellite hadn't been tracked for weeks so as a precise jacteory was know far in advance of the missile test. O fcourse in teh real world you have 30 mins at most (for the longest range missiles - ICBM) to track identify and shoot down a target. As such this test is wholly unimpressive.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 01:11 AM by rogue1


Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
Two: It is up to you to prove your position and arguement, not me! You google them and source them.


Actually it is up to you to prove me wrong, whihc you have not even attempted to. Of course you can't sispute my information otherwise you nwould have.

Three: My 'point of view' as you call it, is common knowledge for anyone who has the slightest inkling about US naval procedures and practices, which apparently you do not!


Of course you do ? Excedpt you have shown absolutely no evidence you do except the sad expression " Us Navy is the best, they have thought of everything", whihc obvioulsy they haven't


I would not say you have your head buried in the sand, as it is blaringly apparent that you suffer from cranial rectalitis! And you're right, this isn't a debate it's us talking to a brick wall!


Balah, you have proven nothing to contradcit me, in fact you have argued nothing at all.

I stooped to your level as it seems that is the only thing you understand. Of course, anyone checking your profile or just looking at your current point total can tell that you think you are above the rules and have probably had more posts banned than not here.



Of course that is all suppostion and in fact I have no post bans. But of course you want o make yourself seem more intelligent. Good for you - now can you nactually argue your point or just post personal attacks. You have presented NOTHING whatsover to contradicat the OP and make yourself seem irrelevent to this thread


My apologies to the mods for going off here, but sometimes you just gotta put a know-it-all punk in his place.


don't apologise for self berration although it is kind of strange. Where do you live? In the USA ? I so you can probably find a good shrink, who will sort out all your inferiority problems At leat in your bubble.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 12:46 AM by hangedman13


Well during the Clinton administration lots of high tech data was stolen or given to the Chinese. How many people die if a carrier gets taken out? Do you think the Chinese wouldn't work hard on a way to both destroy a huge military asset and demoralize the enemy? Underestimating China will be our biggest mistake.



   copyright & usage 


<<  5    6    7    8  >>













































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.019 seconds
Page processed in 0.091 seconds
6 total database queries (1)

(:)








The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownershipwho maintains
strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.






It looks like you're using some kind of software designed to block advertising while surfing our site.

We work very hard to provide an efficient Internet presence that services over 200,000 daily visits from people and automated web spiders. A large web site like this, that can handle that amount of traffic, is increasingly expensive to operate. Our only viable source of revenue (for now) are the ads displayed on each page.

If you enjoy our content, please enable our domain in your ad-blocking package.

more information       contact us

[hide this message]