It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Wake up, America. The boys are coming home, and they're not the boys who went away. - On New Year's Day, the New York Times welcomed the advent of 2009 by reporting that, since returning from Iraq, nine members of the Fort Carson, Colorado, Fourth Brigade Combat team had been charged with homicide. Five of the murders they were responsible for took place in 2008 when, in addition, "charges of domestic violence, rape and sexual assault" at the base rose sharply. Some of the murder victims were chosen at random; four were fellow soldiers -- all men. Three were wives or girlfriends.
This shouldn't be a surprise. Men sent to Iraq or Afghanistan for two, three, or four tours of duty return to wives who find them "changed" and children they barely know. Tens of thousands return to inadequate, underfunded veterans' services with appalling physical injuries, crippling post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and suck-it-up sergeants who hold to the belief that no good soldier seeks help. That, by the way, is a mighty convenient belief for the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs, which have been notoriously slow to offer much of that help.
The story is about a group of Vietnam veterans who were unwittingly the subjects of a chemical experiment which went wrong, and are still feeling the nightmarish after-effects. This is always a topical subject, because everyone now knows that the Pentagon during that war was 'outtacontrol' and threw chemicals around like jelly beans, burning down a large proportion of the trees in Southeast Asia in order to kill two or three Cong, tinkering with the minds and emotions of their own men by giving them hallucinogens, and generally acting as most armies act in time of war. (Where there's a war there's friendly fire, fragging, and own-side casualties such as these.)
No society that sends its men abroad for war can expect them to come home and be at peace, as returning Iraqi vets are proving in alarming numbers.
How Can We Stop the Epidemic of Killing Women and Children By Returning Soldiers
Originally posted by News And History
reply to post by jam321
That's for the military to cover-up, and the rest of us to find out. Do you trust the Pentagon's statistics? People like them are in control of news-corporations like Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, and other false-news outlets. They've been lying to the general-public about how many military soldiers have killed innocent-families for decades. Why would they stop lying about their statistics now?
The government isn't just going to release the statistics you've asked me to present to you. They keep that information for themselves & they giggle over that stuff. Those mass-murderers only do one thing more than killing: destroy evidence.
[edit on 6-4-2009 by News And History]
Women and children in America (like other humans) very frequently behave badly. Perhaps, having returned from the war where many of them saw a side of life very different from their previous experiences, and perhaps having altered philosophically as a result, the soldiers find it more difficult suddenly to overlook the lame and deficient behavior of their loved ones. In previous generations, when wife-beating and whipping the kids into line were not so illegal or noteworthy, this discontinuity could have been worked off in a few decreasingly violent episodes of friction until life eventually returned to normal. But nowadays, with less tolerance for returned-veteran domestic violence, the cops get called while the soldier is still decompressing, the whole thing escalates and the soldier runs amuck.
Originally posted by News And History
It's a well-known fact that billions of soldiers working for the occult-world government have been trained to kill men, women, and children without flinching or even getting a weak-stomach. Most of them would even consider killing their own families, if they snapped back into the war-zone (it's not just a field, it's a state of mind).
Originally posted by News And History
It's a well-known fact that billions of soldiers working for the occult-world government have been trained to kill men, women, and children without flinching or even getting a weak-stomach.
Originally posted by nine-eyed-eel
I bet if we looked into it case-by-case, many of the victims may have done bad things that contributed to their getting slain. (I think cops tend to agree that victims are less likely to be innocent than to be "begging for it".)
According to analysis by FOX News, the murder rate among vets is seven per 100,000. In the same age group, among civilians who live in the USA, it is 40 per 100,000. Therefore, the military murder rate is actually 82 percent lower than the civilian murder rate.
www.foxnews.com...
pajamasmedia.com...
In an article in the Weekly Standard, John J. DiIulio Jr. offered the much-needed context that the Times failed to provide.
The Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) and other veterans’ advocacy groups are absolutely correct that not merely “many” but the vast majority of veterans not only remain completely law-abiding but go on to lead stable and productive personal, professional, and civic lives. Assuming 121 homicide cases in relation to 749,932 total discharges through 2007, 99.98 percent of all discharged Iraq and Afghanistan veterans have not committed or been charged with homicide.
And assuming 121 cases and 749,932 total discharges, the homicide offending rate for the discharged veterans would be 16.1 per 100,000. The U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) has demographic data aplenty on homicide offending rates. For instance, in 2005, for white males aged 18-24, the rate was about 20 per 100,000. The Times opined that 121 was the “minimum” number, even as it counted veterans charged but not convicted with veterans tried and found guilty. Doubling the number to 242 would double the rate to 32.2 per 100,000.
www.nypost.com...
Justice Department statistics show that Americans in the veterans' age group, 18 to 34 years old, commit about 150 murders a year - an identical number of their civilian peers would've committed 700 to 750 murders in the same time-frame.
www.post-gazette.com...
According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, there were, on average, 8.7 murderers per 100,000 people annually between 1976 and 2005. The figure for combat veterans is nearly twice that high. Sounds like a problem.
But hold your horses. The 121 murders committed by veterans have been since the war on terror began, a period now of more than six years. To be kind to the New York Times reporters, let's call it four years, from the time vets would have been returning from Iraq. That means the annual rate of murders by combat veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan is about 4.5 per 100,000, or about half that of the civilian population.
Hold your horses tighter. Most murders are committed by young men. Males accounted for 88.8 percent of all homicides for the period studied, according to the Justice Department. Both men and women aged 18-24 accounted for 36.6 percent, men and women aged 25-34 for 28.4 percent. But the armed forces are comprised overwhelmingly of men in those age groups. In 2005, there were 26.5 murderers per 100,000 people aged 18-24. For those aged 25-34, there were 13.5 murderers per 100,000.
"To match the homicide rate of their peers, our troops would have had to come home and commit about 150 murders a year, for a total of about 700 to 750 murders between 2003 and the end of 2007," noted retired Army Lt. Col. Ralph Peters.
Their civilian peers are five times more likely to commit murder than are vets of Iraq and Afghanistan. Seems to me that if there's a problem, it's with the civilians, not the soldiers. But Ms. Sontag and Ms. Alvarez had a "narrative" -- perpetuating the myth of the wacko vet -- and they ignored, or twisted, pertinent facts that didn't fit it.
Originally posted by News And History
reply to post by jam321
That's for the military to cover-up, and the rest of us to find out. Do you trust the Pentagon's statistics? People like them are in control of news-corporations like Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, and other false-news outlets. They've been lying to the general-public about how many military soldiers have killed innocent-families for decades. Why would they stop lying about their statistics now?
The government isn't just going to release the statistics you've asked me to present to you. They keep that information for themselves & they giggle over that stuff. Those mass-murderers only do one thing more than killing: destroy evidence.
[edit on 6-4-2009 by News And History]
Originally posted by secretagent woooman
reply to post by ChrisCrikey
The problem is that they are legally obligated to disclose providing treatment even though they cannot disclose conversations between patient and physician. The other problem regards possession or use of weapons since it is illegal in many states to firearms to someone who admits to mental illness or who has undergone psychological care. Not sure what the military's legal standard is but it is my undetstanding that they cannot legally allow an at-risk person to possess or use a weapon similar to a civilian police force.