Originally posted by jfj123
I WAS THERE WHEN I READ IT !!
Then Ill ask again, genius, copy paste the quote and translate for us what you think I wrote and how when I say "you gays" somehow means:
"you" you" or when I say, "you gays" I am actually "writing" something else even when it is spelled the same way "You" and "Gays" are, I
am actually writing this "jfj123" Please share with us, won't you jfj123, of and yes I am speaking directly to you IE; jfj123. Rather than admit
you got yourself painted in corner here and are just so above admitting you screwed up like you have when you think what is written in that bill
doesn't have anything to do with getting people to compromise their otherwise drop dead honest opinions of homosexuals and their sympathizers.
Please allow the gentle readers the opportunity to witness your staggering intellect and clever repartee by telling them what the statement I typed
out REALLY is typed out to say, because YOU know what I really wrote. Regardless of your reading what you want to read in what people say or don't
say, write or don't write. I submit this is the reason the very reason we cannot afford to allow people whose very own issues of hatred and
prejudice of a "group" he singles out and superimposes his own hatred on what they say, as if they actually said it.
Then he responds to the argument he is now having, virtually with himself, vicariously as if it is the Christian he aims to exploit as the root cause
and underlying motivation for a bill like this as if this bill is just a waste of time for our elected officials to approve because, according to him,
it has no teeth so then WHY EVEN BOTHER.
but getting back to my argument, challenging jfj123 to take responsibility of his statements for the third time is has contradicted but is too
skeeeered to illustrate in any way shape or form HOW his allegations can be seen as anything other than delusions and / or wishful thinking.
I believe he knows when I wrote "You Gays", I was talking to Gays, ALL gays, Gays in general, and is too desperate, too proud, too in-experienced
and too immature to admit he was wrong and apologize.
Well I'll explain it to you. You see when people of the same sex like each other in a "special way", they sometimes get together in a certain
personal way. You may have heard of this. It's called sex. If you haven't, let me know and I can send you some links that MAY clear a few things
hehe Orange Tom YOU were RIGHT! It is so easy when that tactic is used to simply ask a question to get someone like that to act like a jerk. If you
are right about them not seeing it, I can almost guarantee this one here believes he looked real cool when all I need to do is give em enough rope
The separation of church and state is a legal and political principle derived from the First Amendment to the United States Constitution
So once again....You're wrong.
Your passionate defense of them is almost text book behavior exhibiting latent homosexual proclivities vicariously expressed and defended
because you just happen to be a straight guy that really likes the gays cause,
1. Your attempt to provoke me by calling me a latent homosexual is just plain SAD. Is that really the best you can do? Do you really think you can
provoke me with this pathetic bate?
I must really be getting under your skin
He says with a smile hehe,, so indicative of people whose involvment in threads like this is to do just that, get under peoples skin, I have forgotten
more logical arguments given with more compelling debate, then you will ever know son, so as you flatter yourself underneath that thin veneer of
wishful thinking, BE ADVISED: when you do that, you give yourself away your intentions would have otherwise only been conjecture but are now exploited
as your intent.
You have absolutely no affect on me at all.
Yeah that's it, you got it all over me with that last comment, I have no affect on you, The over a dozen disparaging remarks and name calling I
listed and you shamelessly admitted adding even more sarcasm laced excuses for them, was done because, I have no affect on you.
The over two dozen pages of this thread you have without fail responded to and solicited the overhyped undeserving praise from your clique, as if you
just won a Nobel Prize, as much time, and collaboration you have lavished on me with the praise of reverse prejudice branding me a bigot with every
counterpoint I make when you were overwhelmed as it is being totally out classed by the articulate intelligent wisdom and sound advice of member
Orange Tom. Yes it is true, you need more practice when attempting to "play through" someone so totally out of your league where he not only
pre-empted anticipated dialogue as if he was kreskin, but taught many here, honest enough to borrow from this technique you and all your interlocutors
seem to have adopted as your cliques signature style of debate, he illustrated and proved that anyone can get such an opponent to not only GIVE
testimony that can be used to impeach their argument, but get them to display the coordinating behavior
of beligerant legends in their own minds making patent the axiomatic truth to the scripture in Romans, "though they profess to be wise, they are as
fools given to their delusions" or the writings they think you wrote but can't seem to show us why.
Ill remind them why quoting from the most compelling and credible source, that even you will paradoxically agree and disagree.
You do all this because I have no
affect on you..
Yeah uh huh