Political arguments are like boxing matches. Has anyone else noticed this?
a lot of hard work and perspiration goes into preparing for a boxing match and a good grasp of methodology and skill are required to compete
effectively where a political argument doesn't seem to require a firm grasp of reality, never mind a firm grasp of the language or the points being
made.
political argument is like two dogs chasing their tails in tandem, the outcome of your oppositions struggle is insignificant beside the reassurance
that your ultimate goal covers your own ass.
[edit on 6/4/09 by pieman]