It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
When children go to a dinosaur museum, are the displays they see displays of science or displays of art and science fiction? Are we being deceived and brainwashed at an early age into believing a dinosaur myth? Deep probing questions need to be asked of the entire dinosaur business.
This article will discuss the possibility that there may have been an ongoing effort since the earliest dinosaur "discoveries" to plant, mix and match bones of various animals, such as crocodiles, alligators, iguanas, giraffes, elephants, cattle, kangaroos, ostriches, emus, dolphins, whales, rhinoceroses, etc. to construct and create a new man-made concept prehistoric animal called the dinosaur.
Where bones from existing animals are not satisfactory for deception purposes, plaster substitutes may be manufactured and used. Some material similar or superior to plasticine clay or plaster of Paris would be suitable. Molds may also be employed. A 144-page book titled "Make Your Own Dinosaur Out of Chicken Bones" provides step-by-step instructions complete with detailed drawings and diagrams.
THE IMPOSSIBLE DINOSAURS
A careful study of the sizes of the giant dinosaurs creatures and of what it
would take to deal with such sizes in our world, the felt effect of gravity
being what it is now, indicates that something was massively different in the
world which these creatures inhabited.
A look at sauropod dinosaurs as we know them today requires that we relegate
the brontosaur, once thought to be one of the largest sauropods, to
welterweight or at most middleweight status. Fossil finds dating from the
1970's dwarf him. The Avon field Guide to Dinosaurs shows a brachiosaur
(larger than a brontosaur), a supersaur, and an ultrasaur juxtaposed, and the
ultrasaur dwarfs the others. Christopher McGowan's "Dinosaurs, Spitfires, &
Sea Dragons", Harvard, 1991 cites a 180 ton weight estimate for the ultrasaur
(page 118), and (page 104) describes the volume-based methods of estimating
dinosaur weights. McGowan is Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology at the Royal
suggests an imperfect God who came up with the idea of man as an afterthought, thus demoting the biblical idea that God created man in His own image.
Why were there no discoveries by native Americans in all the years previous when they roamed the American continents? There is no belief of dinosaurs in the native American religion or tradition.
Taller than a house, it had the pelvic structure of a bird, the tail of a lizard and, incredibly, it walked upright on two legs, foraging with arm-like forelimbs."
Were the bones of a bird and lizard and other animals used in the discovery?
but rather by people with vested interests, such as paleontologists, scientists, university professors, and museum organization personnel who were intentionally looking for dinosaur bones or who have studied dinosaurs previously. The finds are often made during special dinosaur-bone hunting trips and expeditions by these people to far-away regions already inhabited and explored. This seems highly implausible.
More believable is the case of the discovery of the first original Dead Sea scrolls in 1947, which were unintentionally discovered by a child, and which were all published by 1955.
Also, a multitude of bones and dinosaurs are strangely found in the same place, suggesting possible planting of bones.
The article T-Rex bones on sale for a cool $12 million indicates that the business of being a "commercial fossil collecting firm" is potentially very lucrative!
The movie Jurassic Park is an example of showing dinosaurs much larger than any current displays in museums. After the movie came out, it is interesting to note that many articles were written asking "Is this possible?". I recall a report of dinosaur DNA being discovered preserved in amber, which later turned out to be false.
How are all these dead atoms intelligent enough to know what to do and where to go to produce the finished fossil?
(Some herds were big enough to cover a whole state)."
dynamic stresses within the bones of the largest dinosaurs indicate that they were too large to move fast without injuring themselves.
"This idea of slow moving animals does not agree with the bio-mechanical analysis of dinosaurs,
There are people who desire and crave prestige, fame and attention. There is the bandwagon effect and crowd behaviour. And then there are people and entities pursuing political and religious agendas.
while Christians claim that the “Bible says the world is about six thousand years old”.
Of course, a goal of Satan is to cast doubt on the credibility of the Christian Bible.
"Jesus said unto him, If thou canst believe, all things are possible to him that believeth” (Mark 9:23).
Questioning what is being told instead is a better choice rather than blindly believing the dinosaur story. Issues should be carefully considered for the sake of good science.
Originally posted by bfitz92
As the nephew of a paleontologist i am going to have to disagree with you on most of it as i have not been able to finish reading , i have to go to football training, but in regards to the Gravity and dinosaurs not being able to withstand it in its present form that may be true, but gravity and the chemical concentrations where completely different back then to what they are now.
The Moon was a hell of a lot closer to us, making the earths gravity weaker to ours today among other things, and the atmosphere was a lot more oxygen rich as well.
Originally posted by DangerDeath
There was more oxygen, about 30% compared to today's 21%.
Earth seems to have grown in size - there is a theory which says that the great continent split because of Earth's growing in size instead of continental plates simply splitting for unknown reason. This would explain change in gravity.
Amateur Finds Prehistoric Lizard
That Returned to the Sea
When amateur fossil finder Van Turner discovered a small vertebra at a construction site near Dallas 16 years ago, he knew the creature was unlike anything in the fossil record. Scientists now know the significance of Turner’s fossil as the origin of an extinct line of lizards with an evolutionary twist: a land-dwelling species that became fully aquatic.
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
Hi and welcome to ATS.
We have a habit of crediting the original source of articles we post here on ATS.
A quick google search revealed one of the sources of this work internet.ocii.com, do you mind including any others.
We also try to include our thoughts and ideas in our OP and not just copying and pasting someone else's work.
I know you are new here so hopefully this was an honest mistake on your part.
Having said that, it looks like an interesting perspective on dinosaurs, thank you for sharing it with us.
Edit: And kronia.com
hello the other article was written by Ted Holden, its an old article and been posted on many sites it dosent have any "source" website
its a famous article called Impossible Dinosaurs,
its not copyrighted in anyway and its unfortunate that u chose to delete it,
often times many times websites like these gets shut down and the information forgotten,the only reason i copy and pasted it so if the website gets shutdown ppl stil can get the information... it wont happen again if its against the rules.....
is it only for copyrighted material?
[edit on 6 Apr 2009 by schrodingers dog]