Originally posted by ctjctjctj
reply to post by TwiTcHomatic
The powers that be do not need us the useless eaters of the earth's resources because they have automated everything from food to fun.
Their robots do the dirty work, and bear in mind, their technologies are at least 50 years, I repeat FIFTY YEARS more advanced than the public eyes
have seen.
Why are humans increasingly being referred to as 'Useless eaters'?
By doing so, you are playing into a mindset created for you to believe.
You are reducing human life to that of units. A kind of resource based slavery. Worthlessess in terms of cash.
All human life has intrinsic value. The fact alone that we are human, makes us other than useless.
Basically the mindsets is, unless you work or produce/earn/create money you have no value.
You are worthless (see the words i'm using? Value, worth, worthless?)
They are all terms to express profit or lack of profit. Value is linked to gain. Monetary gain in particular. Worth or worthless, are another couple
of examples of moneytary gain or loss, profit and profitability. You are playing into a globalist agenda.
Essentially putting profit and loss before the sanctity of human life.
There are no useless eaters, only human beings oppressed by ruthless money and power centric sociopaths, backed by useless and spineless leaders.
As for overpopulation, it's a fallacy. A fairytale to make the 'scarce resources' even more profitable.
Our planet could comfortably support at least twice the amount of people as it does currently. The only obstacle to this is profit and loss.
What do i mean?
If the governments of world, ditched money in favour of co-operation and abondoned profit and profitablity, technologies such as solar, wind,
nanomaterial (metametarials) and geothermal (and a host of others deemed too expensive) energy technologies would not have a cost per K/W attached.
Our deserts could be covered (litterally) with solar panels (for example). Millions of square miles of panels, over every inch of hostile terrian,
would generate enough power to sustain the world. Energy problem then become no energy problem. There are obviously better technologies out there, but
these are considered too expensive (profit and loss again!)
Sea water would be desalinated and distilled. NO water or lack of water problems.
Instead of oil, networks of pipelines carrying water would be routed to inland areas for irrigation and drinking. The Oz outback and other areas (such
as large parts of Africa, The US, and S.A., Siberia, Mongolia, etc etc etc, considered too arid too cold or inhospitable would become world gardens,
to feed the world.
The only thing stopping this happening is humanity's love of money and the political will to oppose those that teach us to love money above all else,
even each other.
As a species we think more of it than each other, it's sickening.
You see, there are no useless eaters, only useless leaders.
spikey.
? 
? 
