It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by T0by
I can't really find many or any examples of thermite welding being used for the actual construction of buildings. Even so, lets assume thermite welding was used in the construction of the WTC or for repairs.
Does the composition of these materials change over time, are they able to be dated?
Are we able to tell apart thermite which was used in construction 20 years ago, and thermite which was used a year ago?
How long has Metastable intermolecular composite ( Super thermite ) been in production?
Originally posted by platoslab
Originally posted by T0by
I can't really find many or any examples of thermite welding being used for the actual construction of buildings. Even so, lets assume thermite welding was used in the construction of the WTC or for repairs.
Does the composition of these materials change over time, are they able to be dated?
Are we able to tell apart thermite which was used in construction 20 years ago, and thermite which was used a year ago?
How long has Metastable intermolecular composite ( Super thermite ) been in production?
It doesn't matter if thermite welding was used in buildings. We are presently in the realm of nanotechnology which instantly rules out regular thermite and construction materials. Toxicity should be a concern as this stuff can't be filtered out from the environment.
Radiocarbon dating can be used to determine age but there needs to be a significant quantity to extract from.
Anyone can grind up some aluminum and iron-oxide(rust) powder to make thermite. However, to make the powder nano-sized will require a lab and special equipment. Example: www.freepatentsonline.com... Please look up nanotechnology for more information.
[edit on 5-4-2009 by platoslab]
Originally posted by TheAgentNineteen
These so called "Scientists" are, and have been "9/11 Truthers" since the very beginning. How does this allow for their work to be non-biased and completely, factually analytical in nature?
Also, to those who dismiss Thermite as a welding element for general steel, you need to realize that Thermite is not simply used as a Welding Medium, it is in fact used to create a Molten Metal of its own right which is poured between joints. It is not the same as your standard welding (i.e., involving Arcs), of which I believe many of you are under the impression when discussing such an issue. It is a common Welding Style used in the presence of Heavy Iron and Steel Sections of a structure.
Originally posted by TheAgentNineteen
These so called "Scientists" are, and have been "9/11 Truthers" since the very beginning. How does this allow for their work to be non-biased and completely, factually analytical in nature?
Originally posted by esdad71
Also, I did read the 25 page pdf that was linked in the OP. There was NOTHING to prove nano-thermite was used. It was an inconclusive test. Acetylene torches and nothing else. this is as good as when they tried to make molten metal in a saucepan/skillet.
This is not about debunking but common sense and not jumping on a bandwagon. If you showed good evidence, I would concede and not act the fool and say The government would never do that....
Originally posted by billybob
OMG, READ IT PEOPLE. don't let people like esdad, here, tell you what's in there. you are badly misrepresenting the paper, esdad.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
reply to post by pteridine
Iron is not an "oxidizing metal." You are confused about the chemistry
Am I?
Fresh iron surfaces are lustrous and silvery-grey in color, but oxidise in air to form a red or brown coating of ferrous oxide or rust.
en.wikipedia.org...
'Nuff said.
really. acetylene torches? that is completely wrong. there is NOTHING to do with acetylene torches. methinks you seek to muddy the waters with nonsense.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
(disregard the news reports and police/fire references to "secondary explosions.")
Originally posted by strokker
I have seen steel and aluminum melt and distort in a good oak campfire or the remains of a fully involved single family dwelling.
Its not hard to envision molten metal at the bottom of that massive amount of rubble at all.
Originally posted by yellowcard
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
(disregard the news reports and police/fire references to "secondary explosions.")
You mean that couldn't have just been a pillar collapsing, being precursor to another collapse, or a gas valve exploding? Yes, it totally had to be a bomb You see what you want to see, and hear what you want to hear, but in the end you have 0 evidence other than your speculation based on no physical evidence or fact, as seen from the eyes of a trained professional.
Originally posted by Highground
I, for one, would like to see sources from somewhere other than, "In my experience," or the various 9/11 conspiracy websites.
I enjoy non-biased sources more than clearly biased ones.