It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vehemes terra eternus
I have a final question for both truthers and skeptics.
What piece of evidence (for OS or against) really stands out in your opinion???
Originally posted by finemanm
Muslims did commit the acts of terror and murder on 9/11. That’s just a fact. If the Israeli government had intelligence that Bush ignored, it doesn't make the Jews complicit in 9/11.
The FBI had intelligence about 9/11 that the Bush Administration ignored.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Also kinda hard to explain how a half dozen "hijackers" are still alive.
Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
BBC News
Sunday, 23 September, 2001, 12:30 GMT 13:30 UK
A man called Waleed Al Shehri says he left the US a year ago
Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well.
The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.
Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September.
His photograph was released, and has since appeared in newspapers and on television around the world.
Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco.
He told journalists there that he had nothing to do with the attacks on New York and Washington, and had been in Morocco when they happened. He has contacted both the Saudi and American authorities, according to Saudi press reports.
He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Daytona Beach in the United States, and is indeed the same Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI has been referring.
But, he says, he left the United States in September last year, became a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines and is currently on a further training course in Morocco...
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Here's a BBC article: (amazing how the US corporate media ignores these troubling details.)
Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
BBC News
Sunday, 23 September, 2001, 12:30 GMT 13:30 UK
www.debunk911myths.org...
Hijackers still alive?
This claim is based on a report by the BBC on September 23, 2001. The BBC has since reported about the 19 hijackers, and has issued corrections to this story.
In the aftermath of the attacks, there was confusion about names on the list issued by the FBI, as well as lists obtained by the Boston Globe and other media outlets.
Waleed al-Shehri
There was confusion regarding one name on the list -- Waleed Alshehri. In a case of mistaken identity, a different Waleed Alshehri (other than the real hijacker) was initially identified. This Waleed Alshehri came to Daytona Beach, Florida in 1996, took aviation lessons at Embry-Riddle Aeronautics University, and was employed as a pilot for Saudi Arabian Airlines. He was living in Morocco at the time of the 9/11 attacks.
Abdul al-Omari
There was also confusion regarding Abdul al-Omari. Someone with a similar name in south Florida, Abdulrahman S. Alomari, took flight lessons at Flight Safety International. He was identified early and confused with the hijacker. Abdulaziz Alomari, a 28-year old in Riyadh, said his passport was stolen while he lived in Denver in 1995, and thought his identity was stolen by one of the hijackers.
Saeed al-Ghamdi
Said Hussein al-Ghamdi, a Saudi pilot living in Tunis, was also mistaken, with CNN broadcasting his picture instead of that of Flight 93 hijacker, Saeed al-Ghamdi.
Marwan al-Shehhi
The list obtained by the Boston Globe on September 12 included the name Marwan Alshehri. (name really is Marwan al-Shehhi)
Khalid al-Mihdhar
In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, some news reports showed a picture of Khalid Al-Mihammadi, a computer programmer from Mecca, in place of Khalid al-Mihdhar's picture. Mihammadi had been in the United States to study English in Florida, and in Indiana. One story, published by the BBC on September 23, indicated that Mihdhar was possibly still alive. In 2006, in response to 9/11 conspiracy theories surrounding its original news story, the BBC claimed that confusion arose with the common Arabic names, and that its later reports on the hijackers superseded its original story.
Why the confusion?
* One source of confusion is the fact that hijackers often varied the spelling of their names when renting rooms, banking, and other activities. For example, Hani Hanjour, whose full name is "Hani Saleh Hanjour", also used "Hani Hanjoor", "Hani Saleh", "Hany Saleh", and "Hami Hanjoor".
* Also, some of the names, particularly "al-Ghamdi" and "al-Shehri" are extremely common names in Saudi Arabia, as Smith is common in the United States.
“ In the rush to reveal information, these were published without due authentication. According to a US source, the FBI committed some errors in its inquiries at the beginning of the investigation. First, it asked about pilots or trainees at airlines whose names resembled those of the hijackers. This was on the presumption that the hijackers should be pilots or experts in aviation. This led to the confusion about the names of pilots Saeed Al-Ghamdi who turned up in Tunis, Abdul Rahman Al-Amri who was in Jeddah and Waleed A. Al-Shehri, who showed up in Rabat. These three men have been cleared of any association with the alleged hijackers.”
Originally posted by mmiichael
For the most part intelligent people laugh at or just ignore the controlled demolition mythology. I think it's become insidious as a new meme is created and a generation of kids, naturally mistrusting parental authority,
start taking this exotic alternate history as fact rather than seeing what it really is.
Mike
[edit on 7-5-2009 by mmiichael]
Originally posted by dark_horse
Actually, Mike, a great number of "intelligent" people see the collapse of three buildings, only two of which were actually hit by planes, to be controlled demolitions. These people include structural engineers, architects, and even demolition experts. These people cannot be dismissed as delusional children, and in all likelihood they have expertise that stands up against simple dismissal.
The fact that you deny that something is true does not make it untrue. In places where these kinds of arguments determine real outcomes, your dismissal would not get you anywhere, because you haven't offered proof of any other plausible scenario.
Originally posted by mmiichael
For every engineer that has trouble with the official NIST report there are 1000 who did not.
As to the exploding paint. Well it was covered in laborious detail in this very thread and shown to be bunk of the first magnitude. Those with college course science degrees who consider themselves experts in multi-disciplinary fields have dissenting remarks. They should be grateful professionals even bother to reply to their questions on pseudoscience accompanied by adolescent histrionics.
Originally posted by bsbray11
I'm not really going to ask about it but it seems to me that you really think Americans do all the things they're "supposed" to, the way they're "supposed" to, to a degree that I just don't see in real life. You think a majority of people would actually jump all over a 10,000+ page technical report on an event 5 or 6 years in the past? I just saw a thread saying 80% of American families didn't even read a single book last year. I'm just saying, let's be realistic, not assume everything here is perfect and every problem is always fixed automatically and immediately by people who just know better. There is still disagreement between professionals on the issues, on technical issues that I could bring up here that you also would not be able to answer, like what the eutectic mixture was that melted through WTC2 and WTC7 steel as reported in FEMA appendix C.
The obvious thing to do is petition for re-investigation, at least until enough people actually pay attention to these seemingly trivial problems to actually find a definitive answer for them, instead of anyone's speculation. For example, it doesn't take very many resources to put drywall dust all over a steel column, and try to light it and see if it does anything that conventional thermite can't. The question is 'how long must we sing this song' and devote media attention and all these other resources to something that supposedly is easy to debunk.
[...]
Instead of responding with pure rhetoric, can you briefly recap what the specific technical issues are with the material in the article?
Originally posted by mmiichael
Instead of responding with pure rhetoric, can you briefly recap what the specific technical issues are with the material in the article?
Not a chance. Reread what was written. That's why it is archived.
Millions in the world have engineering degrees.
Originally posted by bsbray11
I will read back through this thread and find nothing but more of this same run-around. I will ask again for you to post any evidence whatsoever that the Jones, et al article is "bunk," as you put it. Whatever that is supposed to mean in technical terms, I couldn't say, because you refuse to even elaborate.
not even 1 in 1000 have actually read the NIST report or even really care about the technical details of the WTC collapses. Most people in this country are probably still unaware that a third skyscraper even collapsed that day.
You just keep having faith in your perception of what most people think and we'll just agree to disagree on the legitimacy of that faith.
Originally posted by mmiichael
If you go through the thread 'pteridine' supplied detailed breakdowns of Jones' paper and it's many fallacies along with sound chemistry. 'Genradek' and 'ElectricUniverse' among others supplied critical information.
When 10,000 people say they saw a meteor shower and 100 say they saw a space fleet, I go with the meteor shower.
You have no idea how many people read through the NIST report or how many read detailed summaries.
The merits of scientific data and analysis is what this is all about.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Instead of giving me actual information you refer me to other people again. I have pteridine on ignore because he's a troll.
Originally posted by mmiichael
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Here's a BBC article: (amazing how the US corporate media ignores these troubling details.)
Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
BBC News
Sunday, 23 September, 2001, 12:30 GMT 13:30 UK
I still check in on this thread out of morbid curiosity. Not unexpectedly we have a report made 12 days after 9/11 that was corrected at source.
Keep swapping stories with each other by the campfire. Lots of websites and Youtube to trawl through.
www.debunk911myths.org...
Hijackers still alive?
This claim is based on a report by the BBC on September 23, 2001. The BBC has since reported about the 19 hijackers, and has issued corrections to this story.
No "corrections" were issued. Just a pathetic one word addendum and a lot of unnecessary reiteration to placate the criminal neocon cabal. Probably to avoid getting "accidentally" bombed like Al-Jazeera or kidnapped and tortured for months like the AP and Reuters staff.
In the aftermath of the attacks, there was confusion about names on the list issued by the FBI, as well as lists obtained by the Boston Globe and other media outlets.
Waleed al-Shehri
There was confusion regarding one name on the list -- Waleed Alshehri. In a case of mistaken identity, a different Waleed Alshehri (other than the real hijacker) was initially identified. This Waleed Alshehri came to Daytona Beach, Florida in 1996, took aviation lessons at Embry-Riddle Aeronautics University, and was employed as a pilot for Saudi Arabian Airlines. He was living in Morocco at the time of the 9/11 attacks.
Abdul al-Omari
There was also confusion regarding Abdul al-Omari. Someone with a similar name in south Florida, Abdulrahman S. Alomari, took flight lessons at Flight Safety International...
There seems to have been a LOT of "confusion." Was there also confusion about the matching published photos and personal details of these "hijackers?"
That laughable government psyops Debunk911myths.com makes it sound like it was just a little confusion over similar names.
BTW, why wasn't all this "confusion" over 7 "hijackers" who are still alive ever corrected by the FBI, CIA or corporate US media?
[edit on 3-6-2009 by GoldenFleece]
Originally posted by mmiichael
The real outstanding questions are concerns far more internecine. Who in the US intelligence agencies was aware there was an impending attack from Middle East terrorists? Did they know specifics like dates and targets?
Why has the death of Osama bin Laden been concealed for so many years? Why does the CIA perpetuate this disinformation? Was he involved in the planning and to what extent?
What role did Pakistan play in all this? Why is their involvement never discussed?
Many other outstanding questions involving international politics and supposed US allies in the Muslim world.
Originally posted by mmiichael
'pteridine' knows what he's talking about and always provides hard scientific data. But you refuse to read his messages because they contain solid information instead of conspiracy speculation.
Originally posted by Jezus
Originally posted by mmiichael
'pteridine' knows what he's talking about and always provides hard scientific data. But you refuse to read his messages because they contain solid information instead of conspiracy speculation.
You are so cute.