It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ansiroth
Let's also not forget that 3 to 4 weeks after the towers came down, the clean-up crew found a molten river of steel flowing underneath the wreckage, People actually claim it looked like some kind of foundry.
911research.wtc7.net...
I'm not a thermite expert but iv'e known of it for over a decade and im pretty sure that jet fuel isnt capable of creating molten steel, especially not if the jet fuel created a chain fire.
Thats something else that never added up for me either, they say jet fuel burns at a certain temperature that can collapse the towers, but it seems like the fires that are reported to have collapsed the towers would have been the building and its contents burning, not the jet fuel.
Do office supplies burn at 2000 degrees?
Originally posted by Exuberant1
In the area of peer-review, Objections are not even considered until the 'Objector' publishes his objection in an established journal. Until the objector does this - his objections are not even considered by his peers in the peer-review forums.
Originally posted by mbkennel
Originally posted by Exuberant1
In the area of peer-review, Objections are not even considered until the 'Objector' publishes his objection in an established journal. Until the objector does this - his objections are not even considered by his peers in the peer-review forums.
This isn't true in the slightest.
Originally posted by pteridine
reply to post by evil incarnate
Your phrase "corner them with logic" is not logical. You have not proven anything other than the fact that you have a "feeling" that something was amiss.
Originally posted by pteridine
Jones has nothing and his paper in a vanity journal is so bad that it will be disregarded by anyone with a technical background while being highlighted as "proof" by those who do not understand how it was botched. If you want to believe in a 911 conspiracy, find one with a better shill.
Originally posted by evil incarnate
Actually, I agree for the most part but I very much like having the last word because I really enjoy watching these 'official' story folks fade into the shadows whenever you corner them with logic.
Originally posted by trueforger
Ya but these are not golden plates,matters of religious dogma nor paint flakes.They're thermate.With tiny round iron balls,with no other explanation as to how they got in the rubble of the largest crime scene in our lifetimes where the evidence was taken by what now appears to be the perp's.This is all that escaped the sanitizers,but it is enough to warrant a real investigation,which is where we stand,in need of a real re-do.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
I’ve read through the whole thread.
What’s with the patting yourself on the back? You haven’t done as good of a job as you think.
Originally posted by bsbray11
reply to post by mmiichael
The difference is that FEMA never offered supporting evidence for the religious stuff, but they DID find a eutectic mixture applied to the surface of columns that had eaten holes through them, did a chemical analysis and included it in their report.
There is science behind what this group of scientists is publishing, you just keep calling names, using weasel-words, trying to discredit, etc., instead of looking at it from a purely scientific and objective perspective and criticizing it that way. Why not grow up and be a little more mature and respectful about this? Some people are here to learn, not just to get sick enjoyment out of deriding others constantly.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
OH and by the way that was my opinion.
Thanks for all the stars they were not solicited however. My opinion would not be worth much if I changed it just to be popular or to be seen as popular in the latest Internet Conspiracy fads.