It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mmiichael
Sorry, from your reply I see an un willingness to discuss or even listen to arguments. What I actually said was there are always dissenters, people who disagree with the common consensus in any group. It should be about the merit of the evidence, not the internal politics.
How about those who buy into the No Planes Theory? Are they brainwashed lackeys or fighters for truth?
Collectively from your arguments I see a list of the times the US government has enacted subterfuge in pursuit of foreign policy. This then
is supposed to prove, by inference, 9/11 was pre-planned, and that thermite was the means of CD.
It is the "'Socrates is Greek, all Greeks are human, therefore all humans are Greek" argument.
The thrust of my argument, which has been circumvented, is how do you plant thermite co-ordinating with anticipated plane collision destruction that can be blended in credibly? And why go to such lengths and inherent risk of discovery when you've accomplished the panic you are trying to create?
I find gaping holes in the logic and plausibility alongside the scientific dubiousness, quite frankly.
So call me a skeptic.
Originally posted by the_eighth_tower
What the hell has this got to do with the red chips?
Originally posted by pteridine
reply to post by Kratos1220
The towers were mostly unburned when they collapsed and all that office furniture, paper, rugs, wallcoverings, plastic, etc. was nothing but fuel for a slow burning fire that was insulated by the debris.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Tell us again how those oxygen-starved, black-smoke fires that were 70 or 80 floors high ended up burning 3-4X hotter in the WTC sub-levels, and also how relatively small fires that were buried under 100 floors of dust and rubble found enough oxygen to burn for 3 months when a gaping hole in the building didn't provide enough oxygen for 3 hours?
Early in the morning of February 12, 1990, a deliberate act of vandalism began the conflagration, which soon engulfed almost all of the 14 million tires. Dennis Corr of the Ontario Ministry of the Environment explained that tires are "...probably perfect for burning" because of their high-flame temperature and their shape, which allows an abundant supply of air and keeps the fire going.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Tell us again how those oxygen-starved, black-smoke fires that were 70 or 80 floors high ended up burning 3-4X hotter in the WTC sub-levels, and also how relatively small fires that were buried under 100 floors of dust and rubble found enough oxygen to burn for 3 months when a gaping hole in the building didn't provide enough oxygen for 3 hours?
Something about a coal fire?
Originally posted by pteridine
It went much more quickly than the time required for a series of thermite charges to be effective.
Originally posted by pteridine
The electrical ignition concept requires wires connecting the various thermite charges and switches to initiate the demolition.