It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
reply to post by Solomons
So why exactly isn't this being shown to the courts or start a legal battle which if this report is true proves conclusively that 9/11 was an inside job?
It doesn't. It simply proves thermite was present in the rubble of WTC, which most of us knew back since 2004.
Thermite being present in the rubble is a far cry from proving actual demolitions charges took down the towers; as much as I would like to see that proven.
You can't exactly build a case against the United States government for deliberating killing it's own civilians on circumstantial evidence.
[edit on 5/4/09 by The Godfather of Conspira]
Originally posted by esdad71
I downloaded the pdf and reviewed it. I think maybe this is what they found, since it contains Iron Oxide and the WTC had ALOT of aluminum...
Link to red chips
go to page 23 with the conclusions that they have come to. With using an acetylene torch, and applying the flame to the red chips, they observed a piece jump away...you htink? That does not prove thermite. Sorry but nice post.
Originally posted by pteridine
This is discussed in another thread on ATS www.abovetopsecret.com...'
The fact that the red chips are flat and can be extracted with Methyl Ethyl Ketone [MEK] coupled with the before and after composition by backscatter suggest that they are paint chips.
Originally posted by esdad71
Molten rivers of metal and red paint chips thought to be thermite are TWO totally different conversations.
Originally posted by son of PC
The presence of thermite at even all three towers only proves the extent of Bin Laden's treachery.
To insure the towers collapsed he placed thermite in all three in advance. Such evil!!!!
People, think for yourselves and stop letting other people influence what you believe and who you believe in.
Originally posted by pteridine
reply to post by Griff
They do not posses reactive thermitic qualities. The aluminum burns in air in a thermal analyzer.
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by pteridine
reply to post by Griff
They do not posses reactive thermitic qualities. The aluminum burns in air in a thermal analyzer.
So, get off your but then and inform OSHA and NIST that the paint used for steel in the 60-70's is a hazard.
Originally posted by pteridine
How is it a hazard? Paint burns. "But then" they know that. The contents of the building are a much greater hazard.
Originally posted by esdad71
I downloaded the pdf and reviewed it. I think maybe this is what they found, since it contains Iron Oxide and the WTC had ALOT of aluminum...
Link to red chips
go to page 23 with the conclusions that they have come to. With using an acetylene torch, and applying the flame to the red chips, they observed a piece jump away...you think? That does not prove thermite. Sorry but nice post.
Originally posted by Solomons
So why exactly isn't this being shown to the courts or start a legal battle which if this report is true proves conclusively that 9/11 was an inside job? Instead of just talking why does no one ever take action?..
Originally posted by greenorbs
I have a related question...
Why would they take down WTC 7 with a controlled demolition?
Originally posted by dooper
Simple powdered aluminum is one common element that is used in thermite oxidizers, but it creates mostly heat, not is not a greatly effective explosive.
But what do I know.