It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mmiichael
4. The NIST Report itself bears up well in comparison to the Scientific Method, as it provides a concise and quantified hypothesis, is supported by evidence as well as experiments, draws upon a large body of researchers and independent validation, and has been supported in many parts by peer-reviewed papers and others still in press.
In Appendix C of its World Trade Center Building Performance Study, FEMA claimed:
"Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel... The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified."
Originally posted by the_eighth_tower
The NIST report was prepared by scientists and engineers, not a bunch of psuedoscientific spammers.
[NIST:] "We conducted the study without bias, without interference from anyone," said Dr. Sunder. "We have only one single-minded goal in this effort."
While the Institute said it considered the possibility of a controlled demolition taking place at WTC 7, the notion was dismissed due to the absence of any recordings of an explosion sound.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
reply to post by pteridine
You present yourself as being very knowledgeable, so perhaps you can help FEMA with their lack of understanding:
Originally posted by pteridine
2. Even slow burning fires can be very hot when there is no way to dissipate heat.
Fires are the only possible explanation for any significant amounts of molten metal months later because without constant input of heat, all metal would cool regardless of how it was melted originally.
Dousing with water obviously didn't reach all combustibles as they burned for three months.
"You couldn't even begin to imagine how much water was pumped in there," said Tom Manley of the Uniformed Firefighters Association, the largest fire department union. "It was like you were creating a giant lake."
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
But how did these oxygen-starved, black smoke fires that were 70-80 floors high and burning at a small fraction of the 2700 F. temps required to melt steel become roaring infernos in the WTC's basement sub-levels? I still haven't figured out how the tower's free-fall collapse didn't violate the laws of physics, e.g. conservation of energy and momentum. Now you're trying to suggest that the fires transcended the space-time continuum? I never cease to be amazed by the cleverness of those cave-dwelling Arabs!
Is there any end to the paranormal events that occurred that day? Those must've been quite the combustibles to burn for three months straight without oxygen, even after firefighters poured what they describe as enough water to create a "giant lake."
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Originally posted by pteridine
2. Even slow burning fires can be very hot when there is no way to dissipate heat.
Or say, obtain oxygen?
Oxygen's presence is apparent by continued combustion. These locales will induce drafts through a chimney effect. The fires, like mine fires, are difficult to extinguish. These would have many pathways for air to infiltrate as the collapsed structure would be porous and could also be fed air, from beneath, by the subway system. Slow burning fires buried in the rubble get hot and stay hot because they cannot readily dissipate heat.
I still haven't figured out how the tower's free-fall collapse didn't violate the laws of physics, e.g. conservation of energy and momentum.
Why would it. No matter what induced the catastrophic collapse, Gravity worked and physics prevailed. Check a high school physics text.
Dousing with water obviously didn't reach all combustibles as they burned for three months.
Obviously. Is there any end to the paranormal events that occurred that day? Those must've been quite the combustibles to burn for three months straight without oxygen, even after firefighters poured what they describe as enough water to create a "giant lake."
See my note on mine fires. FDNY probably doesn't deal with that sort of thing very often. Your conclusion of paranormal events is due to your lack of experience.
I admire your perseverance and ability to provide straight-faced explanations to increasingly ridiculous scenarios. Thanks for playing.
Likewise, I admire your perseverance and ability to provide increasingly ridiculous scenarios to which I may provide explanations. Thanks for playing.