I was told about it but not specifics so I didnt say anything until right after. I feel bad but the man I turned in didnt say how americans would die soon.m Just that he was friends with the arabs in hamberg, the german and russian mafia, and the nazis from eastern europe and adolph hitlers crews grandkids.. that is the truth swear to god. So they where close knew specifics but not exactly what was up.

Your question is an interesting one. The way I interpret it is as follows. Given the sequence of events that unfolded on 9/11 is there anyone in the story who could be said to be clearly negligent as opposed to traiterous in their conduct that day. I'm trying to weed out the perps and the dupes here and just concentrating on people who may be judged to have neglected their duty.

I think one could make an argument that when Dick Cheney refused to do anything about the aircraft approaching Washington, as remembered by Thomas Mineta, he should have been arrested or at the very least removed from command. I think someone was negligent there.

There might be an issue with the Office of Emergency Management in New York as well when the Mayor changed locations after having been informed that one of the Towers was going to collapse. Were firemen ordered to evacuate immediately? I'm not sure of that.

One could also make an argument that scheduling so many military exercises involving so much of the North American fighter protection and generating so much confusion with false radar blips, etc. could be viewed as negligent, should have been viewed as negligent by some innocent but high ranking military officers. I think, as the OP has already indicated, some of the innocents may have had their silence paid for with promotions.

[edit on 4-4-2009 by ipsedixit]

Sure..

Every member of the Congress that spent the 90s spending the "Peace Dividend".