Originally posted by Exuberant1
Originally posted by nablator
Jumping to conclusions is not research.
Then why do you continue to do it so regularly?
Perhaps you should try speculating, as most of us are currently doing.
There is no need for you to get so upset over a few of us speculating about such things - in the Alien and UFO's forum of all places...
Originally posted by nablator
OK, I concede you have a point, this is clearly an alien gold box, it has alien writing all around it!
You are the one who has interpreted the gold box as being an 'alien gold box' that has 'alien writing all around it'...
...Those are your words.
*I only said that the box was 'strange' - I did this in two posts.
[edit on 5-4-2009 by Exuberant1]
I always wondered why those who try to debunk everything get upset because people are speculating and talking about these thing on a folder titled
Aliens & UFO's. That doesn't make any sense to me.
I think it's because they are dealing with a belief that they hold about these things and because it's a belief they want to be certain. If you
notice everything is absolute with many of them. Any picture or video has been discussed and debunked so lets just shut down ATS since they have all
I think the cave paintings are very interesting and also there not in isolation. These things have been recorded in cave paintings, paintings, ancient
manuscripts, picture and video. Everyone who reports these things are not stupid as some so called debunkers want you to believe.
All of these things can only be false or mistaken if you reduce life in the universe to a box that started on earth 4.5 billion years ago.
I mean just think about it.
Every abduction case - false or mistaken
Every eyewitness account - false or mistaken
Every mass sighting - false or mistaken
Every picture - false or mistaken
Every video - false or mistaken
This is truly illogical and you can only make these assumptions if you start with the priori that these things don't or can't exist. On what grounds
do you reduce life in the universe into a box?
We don't know what constitutes 96% of the universe.
These people can't tell you wether there a simulation or a hologram and yet they can tell you that all of these things are false or mistaken? That
makes no sense.
We have to be enlightened enough at this point in our species or we are in trouble. There's no reason when it comes to these things. People throw
reason and logic out of the window because they start with a belief.
I also think the Betty Hill star map is interesting. I was familiar with the Betty and Barney Hill story in general but the star map is intriguing.
From what I understand she had no knowledge of Astronomy and her map had pictures of a star system that was found years later. How did she know these
things with no knowledge of Astronomy? This is what I looked for. If anyone has any information that she had knowledge of Astronomy I would like to
[edit on 5-4-2009 by platosallegory]