3 officers shot in Pittsburgh

Originally posted by SuturedContusions
Oh of course they have to make it well known about the AK-47

Not only that a police official said. Friends said he feared the Obama administration was poised to ban guns.

www.google.com...

What kind of BS is that, to add that in the news..... doesn't most gun owners fear this?


[edit on 4-4-2009 by imitator]

Wow-

Let's see:

1) Assault Weapon
2) Gun Ban
3) Mental Illness
4) A person concerned about his Constitutional Rights


Does anyone see MKULTRA involved here?

Just saying, the timing is perfect for them.

[edit on 4/4/09 by MajesticJax]

This guy was discharged from the Marines while in boot camp. He had been expelled from high school previously because of disciplinary problems. He was living with his grandparents in a nice neighborhood and no one yet knows what set him off. Obviously, he had mental problems and apparently had mentioned he thought that the police were coming to get him.
Two police officers responded to a domestic disturbance call at 7am, not the first for the address, and were ambushed and killed. Another car showed up and two were wounded, one hit in the hand, one died at the hospital. Another officer had a broken leg. No one could get to the wounded officers until the SWAT arrived.
The dirtball called a pal during the event and said that he expected to die but, unfortunately, he was only wounded in the leg and didn't have the guts to do himself in. Now we'll get to pay for his trial and feed him until he's 90.
For those of you worried about assault rifle PR, he was said to have a pistol and a hunting rifle in addition to the AK. The police didn't say who was shot with what, but given the reports on the volume of fire, the AK was part of the event.

Not only that a police official said. Friends said he feared the Obama administration was poised to ban guns.

Well yes, he clearly said so, and so is Holder. And congress.

HR45 doesn't exist I suppose?

And this news is obviously written to say that: gun owners are nuts, they hate Obama, they are terrorists, therefore, we must ban guns...

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

To remind everybody, the Second Amendment was set up for the sole purpose of giving The People the means to defend against a government that infringes on the Rights of The People. And the government CAN'T INFRINGE that... doing so is treasonous.

[edit on 4-4-2009 by Vitchilo]

Suicides and murders related to the financial crisis and political situation are being under reported.

It is bound to get worse before it gets better.

I grew up in Pennsylvania, it had one of the best education systems in the country. States with higher educated populations, out door sporting enthusiasts in great numbers, and with multi-generational roots in the United States are not going to go down easy into the global new world order.

As unemployment continues to rise, more of our sovereignty is given away, and more of our liberties are infringed upon, you can safely expect to see a rise in isolated violent incidents.

I doubt it will get to the point of all out armed rebellion, but you can expect to see more individuals make a last stand as an exit strategy to a world and lifestyle they have lost all hope for in the future.

Change...don't you just love it?

Not

so you lot in America are really pissed, do you think some type of organisation will rise to try to take America back? this is very interesting of what is going on at the moment

If people want to kill, they will kill. No guns? No problem. This from my home paper today:

Reading police charged two city men late Friday with first-degree murder and related charges in the beating death of a 65-year-old city man last weekend in a house along North Ninth Street.

Luis Antonio Ramos, 25, of the 900 block of Elm Street and Ivan Lopez-Espitia, 22, of the 300 block of North Sixth Street were charged with murder, robbery and related offenses in the slaying of Florencio Muniz-Medina, a native of Brooklyn, N.Y.

Police said the men used a baseball bat and a hammer to kill Muniz-Medina, striking him multiple times in the head.

Source

Originally posted by Vitchilo

And this news is obviously written to say that: gun owners are nuts, they hate Obama, they are terrorists, therefore, we must ban guns...

You are correct..... so that's about 52 million nut gun owning americans.
But we know thats not true.....

You have to remember that americans are all in a prison of sorts in there minds. I doubt they really need prison camps, although i think those camps are real.

The mind control being used in america must e an awful lot, and as huxley knew, people would love there servetude.

Originally posted by deathpoet69
so you lot in America are really pissed, do you think some type of organisation will rise to try to take America back? this is very interesting of what is going on at the moment

Actually, most of "you lot" are either annoyed or fearful. I do not expect anything other than elections to take America back. Of course, those who invent "financial instruments" to bleed the country will be worried that more regulation will come their way that will, as the claim "stifle business." It will do this the same way that police "stifle bank robbery."

If this guy was "concerned about gun control", he's sure not helping us gun owners any

Responsible gun owners don't murder people, period.

Rights and responsibilities are joined at the hip, and this murderer clearly deserves neither.

reply to post by ArMaP


Yeah, I have to agree on you on this issue.

"Friends said he feared the Obama administration was poised to ban guns."

Isn't it kind of convenient that the media was able to locate all these friends of this guy within hours of the shooting to give a quick psychoanalysis of what was going through his mind?

reply to post by pteridine


you can see that things are gripping up, they are making people in to zombiefied robotic servants by at will if someone is aganist the goverment, all the servants, army personnel, police personnel will go for those who do not agree to the or won't be contorted by this elite.

reply to post by pteridine


If we could have a bunch of states to seceed because ``the federal government was no longer respecting the constitution.`` That would get the whole thing going.

Just to balance things out a bit.

It seems like we are being subjected to media dilution...

(how's that for paranoia?)

www.abovetopsecret.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">Man Begs Cop: 'Why Did You Shoot Me Sir?'

Then on fox news they were talking about the shooting in New York and a new shocking revelation "He went and target practiced every week". They really did preface it with with "Shocking Revelation"

reply to post by deathpoet69

Such a group already exists, it's called the Oath Keepers and the group is made up of military and law enforcement personnel who have sworn to protect/preserve the Republic and the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic.

The only problem with that is, who gets to decide who the "domestic enemies" are

Is the guy across the street who put up a sign for a candidate you don't like a "domestic enemy?"

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by Grayelf2009

 

He is a murderer, a revolutionary does not work alone, he works with other like-minded people to get the best results.

He was at home and not at work, so the other revolutionists were not with him at the time.

All I'm doing is pointing out that just because he was alone, does not mean he is not a revolutionist.