Core of Corruption: In the Shadows now on Google Video! (a 9/11 exposé composed of a ton of video m, page 1

Originally posted by rich23
reply to post by king9072

I can only assume that you didn't have the attention span required for what is admittedly a very long video.

If you actually watched this and didn't learn anything, you're either incredibly well-informed, closed minded, or stupid. Given that you think that this documentary supports the official story, I'm finding it hard not to conclude the third option.

9/11 is a huge subject, and this film does a fantastic job and still leaves out shedloads of stuff. But there's plenty that I'd either forgotten about or never seen, and I've been looking at this on and off ever since it happened.

No your mistaken. I am just able to see when someone is telling me theyre giving me an apple when in fact they are giving me some red fruit. Just cause they disguise it as a truth, and come out appearing to damn the administration, at the end of it, you still don't know the truth and you believe alot of the half truths that they present.

Anything to do with hi-jackers, is complete fabrication. This is actually the worst type of video for the truth movement, as instead of outright agreeing with the official story, instead (more convincing btw) they talk about subjects of a section of the official story. If you can't gather what I mean,

Instead of saying we agree that so called "terrorists" snuck onto these planes, and with absolutely no real world flying experience, were able to fly into 3/4 well known landmarks, they tell you about what the hijackers did that day, and yada yada. So after watching it, you come away with the "truth" that there were hi jackers that day, and misdirect you by blaming the bush administration for "royally dropping the ball".

What you fail to understand while your praising the film for its apparent condemnation of the Bush Admin, is that you are taking the stance that they were simply accomplices to the murder, but not the actual murderer themselves. They were, "at the scene" but didn't "pull the trigger".

So they know, that we know, they were involved, so instead of outright denial, they simply build a case to imply that they had simply dropped the ball. After the first 15 minutes of the film, I had seen enough misdirection that there wasn't really much else for me to gain from the film so your right I did end it there.

Just imagine if you masterminded the most brilliant bank robbery in the world. You execute the plan, and make off with 100 million, you kill a couple people, but overall a great success. Only trouble is, someone who knows you gives a positive ID of you at the scene but doesn't know exactly what you were doing. Do you want to go down as the mastermind of the plot and the guy who pulled the trigger? Of course not, so when someone accuses you of being just a dumb mule that was pressured into being the getaway driver, YOU LOVE THAT! Cause its not as bad as the truth. So gobble up the lies, so you'll never be troubled with the truth. It helps you sleep at night.