The starchild skull came into the possession of Lloyd Pye, a writer and lecturer in what he calls the field of alternative knowledge, in
February 1999. According to Pye, the skull was found around 1930 in a mine tunnel about 100 miles (160 km) southwest of Chihuahua, Chihuahua, buried
alongside a normal human skeleton which was exposed and lying supine on the surface of the tunnel.
The skull is abnormal in several aspects. A dentist determined, based on examination of the upper right maxilla found with the skull, that it was a
child's skull, 4.5 to 5 years in age. However, the volume of the interior of the starchild skull is 1600 cubic centimeters, which is 200 cm³ larger
than the average adult's brain, and 400 cm³ larger than an adult of the same approximate size. The orbits are oval and shallow, with the optic nerve
canal situated at the bottom of the orbit instead of at the back. There are no frontal sinuses. The back of the skull is flattened, but not by
artificial means. The skull consists of calcium hydroxyapatite, the normal material of mammalian bone.
Carbon 14 dating was performed twice, the first on the normal human skull at the University of California at Riverside in 1999, and on the Starchild
skull in 2004 at Beta Analytic in Miami, the largest radiocarbon dating laboratory in the world. Both independent tests gave a result of 900 years ±
40 years since death. DNA testing in 1999 at BOLD, a forensic DNA lab in Vancouver, British Columbia found standard X and Y chromosomes in two
samples taken from the skull, "conclusive evidence that the child was not only human (and male), but both of his parents must have been human as
well, for each must have contributed one of the human sex chromosomes". BOLD was unable to extract any DNA from the maxilla. Further DNA testing at
Trace Genetics, which unlike BOLD specializes in extracting DNA from ancient samples, in 2003 recovered mitochondrial DNA though it was not the child
of the skull found with it. Its mother did belong to a known Native American haplogroup, haplogroup C. However, useful lengths of nuclear DNA or
Y-chromosomal DNA for further testing have not yet been recovered. Later testing in 2004 at the Royal Holloway college of the University of London
revealed unexplained "fibers" in the bone of the skull and a reddish residue in the cancellous bone, neither of which are known or recorded to exist
prior to the discovery.
Explanations from the skull's unusual features include the use of cradle boarding on a hydrocephalic child, brachycephaly, Crouzon syndrome,
congenital hydrocephalus, and progeria.
That's from the
Wikipedia page. Most of the references in that section link back to the
Starchild Project, and have since being removed.
I haven't seen the latest A.H. show but if they didn't retest the skull (presuming it's being stored well, and hasn't been badly contaminated)
it's a real shame, because as I understand it DNA extraction has moved on considerably since the last test. It's also far cheaper.
If the mitochondrial DNA associated with it is the skull is true (according to the
Starchild
website it is) its mother was likely human.
If the 1999 BOLD found standard X and Y chromosomes I'm pretty confident any further testing will show a human.
Here's a tinWiki bit (from
here) that raises questions:
]There is some confusion regarding these test results as two distinct experts have claimed to have tested the skull and found clear evidence of
human DNA and both x and y chromosomes. Such evidence would support alternative interpretations that the skull is of a human child that had
hydrocephalus. Dr. David Sweet, Director of the Bureau of Legal Dentistry at the University of British Columbia discovered DNA and both chromosomes.
The Starchild Project enlisted the BOLD Lab, Vancouver to do further tests. The Lab was confident that the results confirmed that the skull was fully
human. The Project declined to agree with these findings.
I have a feeling that believers in this story are never going to find tests and doctors they feel are telling the truth about it being human.
Did the show contact any of the labs/scientists who had previously tested the skull?
[edit on 2-4-2009 by jackphotohobby]