Libertarian Values, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 42 times


reply posted on 1-4-2009 @ 04:17 PM by Skyfloating
Originally posted by TheWayISeeIt
STATES RIGHTS/LAWS: supercede Federal, with what exceptions where? i.e. civil rights. Is that plausible?


Civil Rights is for the Federal Government. The Constitution covers almost everything that needs to be covered. The rest should be up to the states. (in my opinion and that of many Libertarians).


What if Texas outlaws abortion? Is that fine with you too? Where does that leave an impoverished pregnant teenage girl in Midland? How about sodomy laws, which leads to persecution of homosexuals?


The majority actually thinks that it is our business to meddle in other peoples affairs. Libertarianism is all about "their choices are none of my business". That includes someone wanting to be a homosexual: None of my business. That includes somone wanting anti-gay-laws: None of my business. But in a Libertarian society, the homosexual will be able to move to a state which has better laws for him and the anti-gay will move into a state which has the society that best suits him.

Those questions presuppose that we have to meddle in other peoples business in order for society to work. This is, imo, a psychological fallacy. Societies in which everyone simply focuses on cleaning up his own act rather than that of others are the most harmonious. Switzerland is a typical example of a few of these Libertarian Values in Action.

Again this can be broken down into the three Positions:

Posistion 1: Lets get rid of gays

Position 2: Lets get rid of homophobes

Position 3: Let them do what they do while I do what I do.


There is a complexity here that I think is not addresses by the diaspora of Libertarians, hence you are only 2%.


I guess we are 2% because people cant possibly imagine anything taking care of itself. And yet...if you observe nature itself, you see its possible.

You are right about Libertarians not yet being ready to be a major player because the direction is not yet clearly defined. But most of us are not asking for 50%, only for 10% of the votes. And most of us are also asking for various other parties to be part of the game. In short: Down with the 2-party-system.


DRAMATIC REDUCTION OF SIZE OF FEDERAL GOV. - Yahoo! But how does any of this come about under Libertarianism when there is no unity outside of personal ideology of independence and anti-authoritian attitudes which is so subjective?


www.lp.org unites Libertarians of various colors as best is currently possible.

Of course anti-authoritarians are often reluctant to play politics, so more education is needed.


Perhaps it is possible that the current 'secession' of the 20-odd states that is happening right now could be a catalyst for a viable third-party movement.


Yes it could.


reply posted on 1-4-2009 @ 04:20 PM by Basilis
Economic Left/Right: -0.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.82



Seems like I'm straight down the Libertarian line, very slightly leaning towards the left?

That's probably because of my views on homosexuality.

-Will


reply posted on 1-4-2009 @ 04:35 PM by Manwin
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by Manwin


Economic Left/Right: 1.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.28


Thats cool. I only consider way top left and way top right to be mentally ill



I'm surprised I even scored that far to the right. I'm a shade further to the right than the last time I took this test a few months ago. I scored smack dab in the center.

I have always leaned right, but at the same time I'm a pretty big fan of Ron Paul (his policies).


reply posted on 1-4-2009 @ 04:36 PM by Rockpuck
reply to post by mybigunit



lol, we are nearly at the exact same point on the compass. I too didn't trust the Corporations.


reply posted on 1-4-2009 @ 04:40 PM by Rockpuck
reply to post by schrodingers dog




What is the difference between a State government and a Federal Government?


Everything!!! Think of the States as 50 different countries. Why the hell should Main be paying to social programs in California? Or why should higher income states like Washington be sending it's people taxation on Labor to fight a war that does not interest those people? Or why should other states in the Union pay for civil projects via pork placed in bills in DC?

The Union was created to form something quite like the EU .. it was turned into a centralized behemoth by the vial Abe Lincoln and the Federalist. From that point on state's rights where destroyed. A perfect example is in Ohio the drinking age was 19 until Reagan took ALL Highway funding from the state to force them to move to 21 .. even though repeated votes said NO.

Each State is unique, and has it's own Constitution. Localized Government will ALWAYS represent the people better then distant Centralized Governments.

edit to add: Libertarians on the state level would generally push for as little intrusion into personal lives as possible, but would differ greatly on social issues. But that's where it should be decided, and in any fair democracy, Majority rules.

[edit on 4/1/2009 by Rockpuck]


reply posted on 1-4-2009 @ 04:42 PM by mybigunit
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to
post by mybigunit



lol, we are nearly at the exact same point on the compass. I too didn't trust the Corporations.


Cmon Rock you dont have to BS me man I know your just some dirty Authoritarian
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Main Stream Media Taking It To Far!!
  Posted 18 days ago with 22 member flags
Iranian Aircraft Carriers in the Gulf of Mexico
  Posted 13 days ago with 10 member flags
A few questions for those of you who hate the Confederate flag
  Posted 14 days ago with 9 member flags
Why Do You Insist On Doing This?
  Posted 6 days ago with 9 member flags
The System Doesn\'t Own You: Exit Strategies (w/ video)
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags
Getting off of oil.
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags