reply to post by Terapin
ITS not a terrorist attack if they do it... silly.
The first act of air piracy in the history of civil aviation was carried out by Israel, in Dec. 1954, when a civilian Syrian airliner was forced down in Tel Aviv and its civilian passengers and crew held for days, despite international condemnation.The USS liberty was clearly unprovoked aggression on an ally, in an attempt to draw the US into the war. You can ask the survivors of that Israeli terrorist attack on the USS Liberty and they will tell you in great detail about the crimes of Israel against an ally. Zionists killed their own people aboard the Patria. So nice and peaceful are the Zionists, that they kill their own for political gain. Ahh but you do not wish to talk about Zionist terrorism, and perhaps even pretend that it does not happen. You only wish to spread false propaganda about Iran.
In 1968, Israeli commandos blew up 13 civilian airliners at Beirut airport in Lebanon.
The first deliberate shooting down of a civilian airliner was carried out by Israel, when a Libyan airliner was shot down by Israeli jet fighters over Sinai, in Feb. 1973, on the direct orders of Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir, killing all 107 of its passengers and the entire French crew.
JERUSALEM – Benjamin Netanyahu, taking office as Israel's new leader Tuesday, promised to seek "full peace" with the Arab and Muslim world, but refused to utter the words the world was waiting to hear: "Palestinian state." The well-spoken, U.S.-educated hawk took pains to portray himself as a pragmatist, telling a packed parliament that Israel does not want to rule the Palestinians.
Originally posted by finemanm
reply to post by dooper
Don't bother debating these people. These anti-Semitic posts raped in the clothes of criticizing the Israeli government always come from the same posters, and are quickly joined by the same batch of anti-Semites.
Originally posted by Gateway
reply to post by finemanm
YAWN!!
Haven't posted in a while, I can see the quality of debate in this forum has deteriorated as I had predicted it would...but I must say your entire rant is filled with ad hominem attacks and straw man arguments. And boils down to: If an American does not agree with Isreali foreign policy, the he/she is an anti-Semite.
Originally posted by finemanm
reply to post by dooper
Don't bother debating these people. These anti-Semitic posts raped in the clothes of criticizing the Israeli government always come from the same posters, and are quickly joined by the same batch of anti-Semites.
Now they will start whining that its an Israel Lobby ploy to call a critic of Israel an anti-Semite, but these five or six posters in ATS are always on the same threads together spewing their hate speech. The OP's signature is a banner against Israeli goods. BobyLove has started numerous anti-israel threads. Its like these guys have nothing better to do than to look for anti-Israel propaganda. For crying out load, Bobbylove has cite the Iranian State Run propaganda machine known and PressTv as his source for threads he started. Thats like citing to KKK propaganda in the quest to put down African Americans.
Sure, any government could be corrupt and any government can do terrible things. But these people never complain when the Sudanese massacre the people of Darfur, or when sunni muslim blows himself up to kill shia muslims or vice versa.
You will never see one of these people start a post where a palestinian blew himself up in an Israeli market. I bet these people feel that the US deserved 9/11.
I respond to these people becasue its fun toying with mental midgets.![]()
Edit to add, Terpin recently started this BS thread.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I'm all for free speech, but come on ATS, where there is a modis operandi of constant, deliberate and untruthful posts about Israel and Jewish people, why not ban the offensive posters. What if instead of Jewish critizism, this was anti-black or anti-"insert minority here" speach, I am sure there would be action taken swiftly.
[edit on 31-3-2009 by finemanm]
Israel's new ultra-nationalist foreign minister has said it is not bound by a US-sponsored 2007 agreement to reach a peace deal with the Palestinians.
"The Annapolis conference, it has no validity," Avigdor Lieberman said.
He was speaking at a handover ceremony at the foreign ministry, prompting his predecessor Tzipi Livni to interrupt and diplomats to shift uncomfortably.
At Annapolis, each side agreed to further discussions aimed at creating an independent Palestinian state
Palestinian officials said Mr Lieberman's stance could undermine stability.