Anyone remember this?
Princess Diana and CCTV?
The absence of CCTV images showing the Mercedes' journey from the hotel to the crash site has been frequently cited as evidence of an organised
conspiracy. In a submission to the Minister for Justice, Scotland for Public Inquiry in February 2003, Mohammed Fayed stated that there were
approximately 10 video cameras on the route taken by the Mercedes, including one on the entrance to the tunnel itself, yet there are no recordings
from any of these cameras for the night in question. In December 2006, The Independent newspaper published an article stating there were more than 14
CCTV cameras in the Pont de l'Alma underpass, yet none have recorded footage of the fatal collision.
Though apparently at that time as well according to the official inquiry, Judge Hervé Stéphan the magistrate found that
There would be no reason for those in the overnight control room in Paris to be viewing that camera in particular, before the crash.
Mmmm sounds a bit familiar?
Is there a
On over the next few days also?
Anyone remember this? The 7/7 bombings in london
But the investigation received a serious setback when it was discovered the CCTV cameras on the bus that blew up were not working so detectives will
not get vital images of the bomber.
July 7th campaign
To date, no CCTV images of the four alleged suicide bombers have ever been released showing all four of the accused in London on July 7th 2005. In
fact, only one CCTV image has ever been released which purports to show all four of the accused together outside Luton Station, approximately 30 miles
from the scenes of the crimes, in which three faces are completely unidentifiable.
Of the three images released by the authorities since July 7th 2005, none of them offer any sort of proof that all, or indeed any of the alleged
perpetrators, were in London at the time of the attacks.
Furthermore, the images, as released to the general public by the authorities, would be inadmissible as evidence in a court of law and could not be
used to secure a successful prosecution against anyone.
Or the subsequent shooting of Jean Charles De Menzes?
"The BBC has also learned the shooting was not captured on Stockwell Tube's CCTV because police officers had removed the cameras' disks for their
investigation into the suicide bomb suspects who boarded the train at the same station the previous day."
And of what is available,
well where is it?
Very good question in fact....Especially considering the above
Further, despite this intense investigation and the acknowledgement by DAC Andy Trotter of the "CCTV-rich" environment that would reveal the
identity of the alleged perpetrators, which should have yielded thousands of images showing the movements of the four men, only three still-images,
purporting to be CCTV stills from July 7th, have ever been released into the public domain.
The official Home Office report has outlined numerous places where the men were captured on CCTV camera. It has also described situations where it is
implied that they were captured on CCTV camera, as well as occasions where it claims they should have been captured on CCTV, but that, curiously, no
CCTV exists to support such a statement.
Or that is coincided with this?
Elf- Sometime in april 09?
The blood was hardly dry when Tony Blair went on TV at the G8 summit in Scotland to blame "Muslim extremists". This tells us everything.
The attack was carried out:
* To sabotage the G8 meeting, which was in danger of actually producing some progress toward debt relief in Africa and dealing with global
The attack was carried out to distract the world from the financial rape of our generation and our children, by the leaders, their advisers, and
friends? and fellow club members
Starting to fit together?
Patterns beyond probability and credibility emerging?
How about a Pan Continental Dimensional look?
leaked to John Solomon, a Washington-based Associated Press reporter, in 2004—including a Secret Service file
containing the extraordinary revelation that government agents had access to security videotapes of the Murrah Building in which “the suspects”
(more than one) are seen exiting the Ryder truck containing the bomb three minutes before the explosion.
When Terry Nichols was retried on state murder charges in Oklahoma that same year—in an ultimately unsuccessful attempt by prosecutors to get him
sentenced to death—the defense team tried to use the Solomon documents as exculpatory evidence for their client on the basis that the more others
were involved, the less significant Nichols’ own role would appear to have been. They also made a passionate case
And even more amazingly given the above!!!
that Nichols had been denied a fair trial because the FBI and other agencies had improperly concealed relevant evidence.
The judge in the Oklahoma case, Steven Taylor, refused to grant them satisfaction on that front, saying he simply did not believe the official
documents stating that the government had access to security video footage of the Murrah Building
Well well how about 9/11
It is striking that there is neither video footage nor any photographic evidence in the public domain showing a jetliner approaching or crashing into
Many threads on ATS and elsewhere examining what footage is available, and showing obvious time/date and manipulation errors.
With the release of the two video clips, the Pentagon claims to have supplied all of the footage it has of the attack. Although the number and
positions of security cameras monitoring the Pentagon is not public knowledge, it seems unlikely that only two security cameras captured the attack.
Isn't it reasonable to assume that there were dozens, if not hundreds, of security cameras ringing the huge building that is the heart of the United
States military establishment?
The subsequent action by the authorities outside of the Pentagon brings much concern to!
Not only has the government refused to release footage that would clearly show how the Pentagon was attacked, it has also seized footage not belonging
to the military. The FBI confiscated video recordings from several private businesses near the Pentagon in the immediate aftermath of the attack.
Those recordings, if they still exist, might provide decisive evidence about the attack.
* The FBI visited a hotel near the Pentagon to confiscate film from a security camera which some hotel employees had been watching in horror
shortly after the attack. The FBI denied that the footage captured the attack. 1
* The FBI visited the Citgo gas station southwest of the Pentagon within minutes of the attack to confiscate film that may have captured the
attack. According to Jose Velasquez, who was working at the gas station at the time of the attack, the station's security cameras would have captured
the attack. 2
If anything at all happens on this particular stretch of monitored, or as it now seems likely, not monitored part of London it is blatant, even as an
access or escape route for "operatives" if not an event.
They keep doing the same thing their habits and modus operandi, don't need to be changed, as everyone just goes on as normal, and accepts whitewashed
[edit on 31-3-2009 by MischeviousElf]