Obama: out of Iraq by March 31, 2009, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 56 times
Topic started on 29-3-2009 @ 05:32 PM by spacedoubt
Well, he has two days to make good on this.
This was from a debate on CNN, apparently an earlier one. AS the candidate field is fairly large.

Video is here:
Out by March 2009

Here is a text, if you have a slow connection.



Begin a phased withdrawal, have our combat troops out by march 31st of next year,
and initiate the kind of diplomatic surge that is necessary in the surrounding regions.

Make sure that everybody is carrying their weight, and that is what I will do on DAY ONE as

President of the United States.


This is one of the things that got this man elected. Obama the Anti-war candidate.

You have two days sir!

[edit on 29-3-2009 by spacedoubt]


reply posted on 29-3-2009 @ 05:38 PM by loam
reply to post by spacedoubt



I wouldn't pop any pop-corn if I were you.

As I'm sure you did, I saw this one coming from a mile away.


reply posted on 29-3-2009 @ 05:47 PM by spacedoubt
reply to post by loam



Well I Have popped a little corn since then. Only on movie nights, at home.
Because I can't afford to go to the theater much these days.

Seems somebody knocked the struts from under our economy, just in time to allow BO a perfectly good excuse to save us, in other ways.




reply posted on 29-3-2009 @ 06:20 PM by loam
reply to post by spacedoubt



Originally posted by spacedoubt
Seems somebody knocked the struts from under our economy, just in time to allow BO a perfectly good excuse to save us, in other ways.



Now that is a conspiracy of colossal proportions.

I hope you are wrong, but I wouldn't be surprised if you were right.

Contemplating the Bush administration, I now realize...."out of the pan, into the fire".

Just goes to show people should be more careful what they wish for.

Scary universe.

[edit on 29-3-2009 by loam]


reply posted on 29-3-2009 @ 07:11 PM by spacedoubt
reply to post by pluckynoonez



LOL, yes I agree. OMG a dishonest politician!

But we have new tools to hold them accountable.
We have the ability to communicate to people all over the world in a few microseconds. To expose the hypocrisy.

Just a few short years ago, I would have had to rely on a TV station, or a newspaper to dig this up. Now I can do it on my own.


reply posted on 29-3-2009 @ 07:50 PM by Maxmars
Now it seems to me that the message we should be focusing on for the next election (dear Lord, let's hope there IS one) is that we must add a few new realities contrary to those that have become entrenched in our fellow countrymen.

Lesson 1: "It's not the candidate, I repeat NOT the candidate..,"

As much as we want to , we MUST NOT believe in the pretty words, the handsome or lovely faces, the praise of their 'peers,' or the personal histories of the politicians. THE PARTY AGENDA DICTATES THE POLICY. Politicians who stray too drastically from the agenda become, to a great degree, marginalized or rendered ineffectual.

The faces we see, the voices we hear, even to a great extent the 'actions' we are presented with are NOT any indication of what that agenda is. It appears that American's WANT to assume the agenda is beneficial, and that is a doctrine I am not disposed to argue at this juncture; for those suspicious of the agenda already will never trust as they may have in the past. Those who do trust, for whatever motivation, will not have their faith challenged without resistance which is besides the point. I leave that assumption of partisan benevolence as an element for each individual to consider; for the time being.

Lesson 2: "Elections have been changed: It's a POPULARITY contest now."

Politicians cannot survive their careers, in anonymity. They require public attention to be viable in their efforts to be selected as the most popular. Elections are about POPULARITY.

This fact speaks for itself. Consider that although most proclaim to choose a candidate based on rational judgment, issues, and perceived confidence in the candidate's capabilities as a leader, a vast majority of African Americans voted for Barak Obama; there is something very telling in that statistic. Large swaths of formerly ideologically opposed Americans jumped at the chance for 'change' as it was marketed to them. Popularism is a powerful approach to political strategy.

No one (usually) get's elected by telling the people that "it's NOT going to be OK". We MUST ACCEPT that for the most part, POLITICIANS SAY WHAT THEY BELIEVE YOU WANT TO HEAR. It has ever been so....

Lesson 3: Politicians KNOW what they are "supposed" to do..., BECAUSE THE PARTY HAS ALREADY DECIDED. They would NOT support his candidacy otherwise.

If you look into it, you will find that there is a huge population of 'disenfranchised' politicians. Most of whom refused to conform to the party, and were simply 'frozen out' of the mainstream.

Everything happens in politics for a reason. It is a stage, and the actors follow direction as they are instructed. Each party member plays their part, bringing up 'issues' at the right time, throwing down gauntlets when expedient. These politicians of ours are jacked up on Hollywood and Wallstreet media hormones.

Lesson 4: What you though you heard doesn't matter.

The most successful politicians are those who can afford to 'ignore' their own contradictory lives. Most of these people - these leaders, have criminal records. Most of them can't afford to be scrutinized closely. Many of them are one step ahead of the law. Some of them are truly criminal characters, and in the party, the members know exactly who they are. But they tolerate it, for money. They need money to buy media time.

The best salesman wins.

Should I go on, or am I preaching to a choir? I purposefully abbreviate this soapbox diatribe, because I don't like wasting people's time.







[edit on 29-3-2009 by Maxmars]



reply posted on 29-3-2009 @ 08:16 PM by Stormdancer777
Didn't you hear he changed his mind, no withdraw,
second line
www.google.com...

Obama: won't speed up Iraq pull out

10 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama says he won't consider speeding up the troop pullout from Iraq even though security has improved and violence has decreased.

"I think the plan that we put forward in Iraq is the right one" because it calls for "a very gradual withdrawal through the national elections in Iraq," he said in an interviewed aired Sunday on CBS' "Face the Nation."

While he didn't dispute the notion of military progress, Obama said there's plenty to do on the political side to resolve differences between the various sectarian groups. Iraq's security forces also need to be trained, he added.

"I'm confident that we're moving in the right direction. But Iraq is not yet completed. We still have a lot of work to do," the president said of the war that's winding down after six hard-fought years.

Separately, Defense Secretary Robert Gates told "Fox News Sunday" that he hasn't seen "anything at this point that would lead me to think that there will be a need to change the timeline."

The plan that Obama announced last month calls for withdrawing combat troops by the end of August 2010. After the drawdown, a large force of as many as 50,000 troops — about one-third of what is there now — will remain with a new, noncombat mission: train Iraqis, protect U.S. assets and personnel and conduct anti-terror operations.

In the wide-ranging interview he taped on Friday, Obama also said:


[edit on 083131p://bSunday2009 by Stormdancer777]


reply posted on 29-3-2009 @ 08:40 PM by ProfEmeritus
reply to post by spacedoubt



Come on, now spacedoubt. Did you REALLY believe he would keep his promises? How about the "middle class tax cut"? That is also dead on arrival.
what about the promise to eliminate taxes for seniors making less than $50,000 a year? Dead on arrival.
No more pork? Dead on arrival, with almost 9,000 earmarks in the spending bill.
No lobbyists in his administration? Dead on arrival.
5 days for the public to view and debate new legislation? Dead on arrival
Tax credits for businesses that hire new worker in 2009 and 2010? Dead on arrival.

Politicians lie. That is the nature of the beast. The real pity is that so many Americans seem to BELIEVE politicians. That's why we're in the mess we're in.


reply posted on 29-3-2009 @ 09:07 PM by skeptic_al
Originally posted by spacedoubt
Well, he has two days to make good on this.
This was from a debate on CNN, apparently an earlier one. AS the candidate field is fairly large.

Video is here:
Out by March 2009

Here is a text, if you have a slow connection.



Begin a phased withdrawal, have our combat troops out by march 31st of next year,
and initiate the kind of diplomatic surge that is necessary in the surrounding regions.

Make sure that everybody is carrying their weight, and that is what I will do on DAY ONE as

President of the United States.


This is one of the things that got this man elected. Obama the Anti-war candidate.

You have two days sir!

[edit on 29-3-2009 by spacedoubt]


There are only 2 things certain in the world

Death and higher Taxes.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



UN Proposes Tax On Americans for 3rd world countries
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Armed bystander stops stabbing outside school
  Posted 12 days ago with 27 member flags
" Climate Change Is Not A Hoax", says Obama!!??
  Posted 4 days ago with 21 member flags
Former Arizona Sheriff Mack, ‘Gun Control Against the Law’
  Posted 13 days ago with 12 member flags
Limiting Freedom & It\'s Effects On Society
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags