Originally posted by jakeinspace
reply to post by weedwhacker
Maybe you should hit the light switch yourself.The congresswoman is right.The time for action is now. How can you possibly defend the actions of theese crooks and criminals that have been elected or appointed to positions of power in our goverment? Theese people trample our rights and totally disregard the constitution. It is our duty as citizens to protect the constitution from all comers whether we elected them or not, foreign or domestic! It is time for the sheeple people to take a seat.The true patriots of this nation understand what must be done.We are taking our country back and the time is now.
hmmm...single party-state...like the Dem's have now...effectually shutting out the Repub's?
Fascism is a radical, authoritarian nationalist ideology that aims to create a single-party state with a government led by a dictator who seeks national unity and development by requiring individuals to subordinate self-interest to the collective interest of the nation or race. Fascist movements promote violence between nations, political factions, and races as part of a social Darwinist and militarist stance that views violence between these groups as a natural and positive part of evolution. In the view of these groups being in perpetual conflict, fascists believe only the strong can survive by being healthy, vital, and have an aggressive warrior mentality by conquering, dominating, and eventually eliminating people deemed weak and degenerate.
Fascist governments permanently forbid and suppress all criticism and opposition to the government and the fascist movement. Fascist movements oppose any ideology or political system that gives direct political power to people as individuals through elected representatives rather than as a collective nation or race (individualism, liberalism, representative democracy); that is deemed detrimental to national identity and unity (communism, class conflict oriented labour movements, internationalism, laissez-faire capitalism, and social democracy); that protects and empowers people deemed weak and degenerate (egalitarianism) and that undermine the military strength and military ambitions of the nation (pacifism); that may seek to preserve any of the privileges, institutions and cultural values that fascism seeks to overthrow (traditionalism and conservatism).
More at Link...
Gregg Goes From Bipartisan Symbol to Top Obama Critic
Sen. Judd Gregg, who was President Obama's commerce secretary nominee until withdrawing his name from consideration, has emerged as the toughest critic of the president's handling of the economy and has helped galvanize Republican opposition to Obama's policies.
At first, the relationship between President Obama and Sen. Judd Gregg looked like love at first sight, proof that opposites do attract.
Obama is a 47-year-old left-leaning Democrat who believes in the power of government to solve people's problems. Gregg is a 61-year-old New Hampshire Republican who advocated limited government and made millions through business investments.
Their unlikely partnership seemed destined to transcend partisan lines and symbolize the change that Obama promised to bring to Washington.
But Gregg, who was Obama's commerce secretary nominee until withdrawing his name from consideration, has emerged as the toughest critic of the president's handling of the economy and has helped galvanize Republican opposition to Obama's policies.
He warned on Monday that Obama's $3.6 trillion budget proposal will lead to unsustainable debt levels and send the country on a fiscal path resembling that of a "banana republic."
Gregg kept up his attacks on Obama's budget request Saturday in the weekly Republican radio address, saying the path to prosperity is not the excessive spending proposed by the president but limited spending that holds down the growth of government, taxes and debt.
The senator said Obama's proposals "represent an extraordinary move of our government to the left."
He said Obama "is not trying to hide this; in fact, he is very forthright in stating that he believes that by greatly expanding the spending, the taxing and the borrowing of our government, this will lead us to prosperity."
More at Link...
EXCLUSIVE: United Nations Power Grab?
U.N. 'Climate Change' Plan Would Likely Shift Trillions to Form New World Economy
A United Nations document on "climate change" that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes — all under the supervision of the world body.
Those and other results are blandly discussed in a discretely worded United Nations "information note" on potential consequences of the measures that industrialized countries will likely have to take to implement the Copenhagen Accord, the successor to the Kyoto Treaty, after it is negotiated and signed by December 2009. The Obama administration has said it supports the treaty process if, in the words of a U.S. State Department spokesman, it can come up with an "effective framework" for dealing with global warming.
The 16-page note, obtained by FOX News, will be distributed to participants at a mammoth negotiating session that starts on March 29 in Bonn, Germany, the first of three sessions intended to hammer out the actual commitments involved in the new deal.
In the stultifying language that is normal for important U.N. conclaves, the negotiators are known as the "Ad Hoc Working Group On Further Commitments For Annex I Parties Under the Kyoto Protocol." Yet the consequences of their negotiations, if enacted, would be nothing short of world-changing.