It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The liberal base is increasingly disappointed in his war policies.
Russ Feingold, the liberal senator, said that Obama’s plan “could make the situation worse, not better.”
Peace Action, a liberal anti-war organization, is organizing a coalition to oppose Obama’s plan. And Win Without War, an anti-war group, slammed Obama.
The criticisms of the troop expansion in Afghanistan are similar to the liberal concerns over the slower than promised withdrawal from Iraq.
Originally posted by breakingdradles
showing you are on one side, will defeat your point.
Originally posted by jdub297
Obama opposed the Iraq surge. He "adopted" Afghanistan to quiet critics.
Originally posted by Terces Pot Evoba
One of the main reasons I voted for him was that he was bringing home ALL the troops!
how many campaign promises is he actually going to keep?
Originally posted by jerico65
It's funny, isn't it? He was against the Iraq surge, but he's sending a boat load of troops to A-stan.
Kinda like a "surge", huh? But he won't call it that.
Originally posted by Terces Pot Evoba
One of the main reasons I voted for him was that he was bringing home ALL the troops!
how many campaign promises is he actually going to keep?
Originally posted by Terces Pot Evoba
One of the main reasons I voted for him was that he was bringing home ALL the troops!
how many campaign promises is he actually going to keep?
Originally posted by jdub297
reply to post by jd140
Sorry, but BHO is NOT bringing all the troops back from Iraq anymore.
He's gone on record several times describing forces as large as 50,000 to remain in Iraq. He is counting "savings" in his proposed budget for Iraq deployments out to 2019!
jw
If you are referring to my post, then I must tell you that I'm all for us being in both places.
Originally posted by TheAssociate
reply to post by jd140
If you are referring to my post, then I must tell you that I'm all for us being in both places.
No, i wasn't referring to your post, just making a point and putting my 2 cents worth in. No need for hostility and my apologies for any confusion.
TheAssociate
Originally posted by jd140
I'm not naive enough to think that we will ever be 100% out of Iraq. It just won't happen.
Think about it. Besides Vietnam, where have we fought a large war and left completely?
I actually think it would be a bad idea if he did.
Originally posted by Terces Pot Evoba
One of the main reasons I voted for him was that he was bringing home ALL the troops!
how many campaign promises is he actually going to keep?