posted on Apr, 21 2004 @ 12:37 PM
aware, you said all I needed to know...and more.
Evidently the moral fiber of our country has been so eroded that fact and fiction have become intertwined.
In fact, when once it was considered a disgrace to be a liar or a cheat, it is now excepted and expected.
Whats scares me is not that they lie so easily, politicians have always done that, what scares me is these fools believing the lies.
You see, conspiracy theories are just that: theories and bits and pieces of half-backed truths (bits and pieces of 'facts' taken out of context and
then used to frame/build half-baked conspiracy theories).
For a conspiracy theory to hold up to truth, it must be scrutinized and weighed (subjugated to harsh questions, etc).
In regards to those still reported and documented "unaccounted for" WMD's, the two questions I have asked have and are yet to be fully and
empirically answered despite the flip-flop, ambiguious, uncertain Hans Blix comments/assertions. Just as the overly asserted and chimed 'fact' that
Saddam/Iraq did not have WMD's prior to hostilities breaking out, this also remains inconclusive and unempirical proven.
I ask the questions because they need to be suffeciently answered, in regards to yours and others own conspiracy beliefs. If Hans Blix's
statements were so conclusive and empirical
, why is that, as I have mentioned already, that the UN today
and half the worlds nations
list those "unaccounted for" WMD's as still 'unaccounted for'
Despite the hidden inuendo's and word plays, I will continue to hold to the questions as being 100% viable and yet to be fully and suffeciently
answered, for the answers that have been given, have yet to fully and empirically nullify what is being asked.
[Edited on 21-4-2004 by Seekerof]