It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Were Princess Diana and Jorg Haider victims of a 'Boston brakes' assassination operation?

page: 1
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 26 2009 @ 02:50 PM
link   
WOW! LOOK AT THIS! Found these incredible correlations in the deaths of Princess Diana and Jorg Haider.

The article below says they were both assassinated by the same technique, a remote control device called the 'Boston brakes'. It's best if you read the article yourself.

www.consciousape.com...

When Austria’s far-right political leader, Jorg Haider, died in a car crash last October (2008), rumours that his death was no accident quickly emerged. Within hours a semi-coherent theory was doing the rounds, suggesting Haider might have been assassinated by Mossad. His imminent appointment as Austria’s chancellor, the theory proposed, was unacceptable to Israel, who perceived Haider as a kind of latter-day Adolf Hitler.


This is about Princess Diana's death...


In the days immediately following Princess Diana’s ‘accident’, media reports famously informed us that her car “crashed into a concrete pillar while overtaking another vehicle” (a white Fiat Uno). We were also told that the “speedometer was stuck at 120 mph”, a claim later proven conclusively incorrect when Mercedes engineers revealed the speedometer was designed to revert to zero on impact.


This is about Jorg Haider's death...


...Check this paragraph taken from the www.timesonline.co.uk... ... penned just a few days after Haider’s death



“The leader of Austria’s Far Right was driving alone in his black Volkswagen Phaeton on a little-travelled road in southern Austria and crashed into a concrete pillar while overtaking another vehicle. The speedometer of the wrecked sedan was stuck at 142kph (88mph), police said


And there are more correlations given in the article, like references to other articles found in www.guardian.co.uk... and the www.nytimes.com... claiming that Haider was three times over the drink-drive limit when he crashed his car, exactly the same as they said about Henri Paul when he drove Princess Diana to her death.

The article goes on to show that both crashes bore all the signs of a 'Boston brakes' operation, a known assassination technique employed by the West's intelligence agenices and Britain's SAS. Check out the article for yourselves and see what you make of it.

Then please check back and give your opinions...




posted on Mar, 26 2009 @ 03:16 PM
link   
Come on, guys, where is everybody?

I can't believe no one is replying to this thread...

HELLOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



posted on Mar, 26 2009 @ 03:21 PM
link   
uh, well yeah, maybe.

with all the electronic gadgetry in modern cars, who would find the culprit? cooking lab results is nothing new either, so it's perfectly doable. power steering would be a piece of cake, too and lends itself to remote control.



posted on Mar, 26 2009 @ 03:28 PM
link   
The point, though, was that the correlations between the two 'accidents' are so stark. It's definitely doable.

A lot of people in the UK think Diana was hit by MI6 in a 'Boston brakes' operation. But given the evidence in the above article, do you think Haider was whacked as well? By the same 'Boston brakes' operation?

And if so, doesn't this add weight to the argument that Diana was assassinated, especially as she herself said that her former lover and bodyguard was murdered by MI5? His name was Barry Mannakee, by the way, and he was killed in 'road traffic accident'!



posted on Mar, 27 2009 @ 01:13 AM
link   
It would be interesting to have a look at Haider's driving record. Did he have DUI convictions in the past?

If a government wants you dead, say "Bye bye."



posted on Mar, 27 2009 @ 01:54 AM
link   
They died due to the poor design of the tunnel.

If there were proper road barriers in there instead of pillars they would all still be alive.



posted on Mar, 27 2009 @ 12:24 PM
link   


They died due to the poor design of the tunnel. If there were proper road barriers in there instead of pillars they would all still be alive.



No doubt that's why those particular tunnels were chosen...



posted on Mar, 29 2009 @ 04:30 PM
link   
Does anyone care about this subject? I raised it because there seem to be serious correlations between Diana's highly suspicious death and that of Jorg Haider.

I know it's all been said before, but that doesn't mean we should discard it. Does it?



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 02:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by winston_boy

I know it's all been said before, but that doesn't mean we should discard it. Does it?


discard it? not quite, keep it in mind, i just find it hard to talk about things we have too little evidence on. remote control is usually indistinguishable from actual input, so either drive a bike (no power steering and no differential braking either) or be sure to carry powerful ECM (ie. a jammer) with you, if you feel you might be targetted.

PS: do you remember Pim Fortuyn getting killed by a stereotypical 'lone wacko'. being politically right or simply un-correct is dangerous business, isn't it?

heck, there's the old issue of what such protesters' parties and terror groups might really be - cointelpro www.abovetopsecret.com... if that were true, people with a vain bend might become dangerous once they tried to unveil such operations. lots of shady areas.

[edit on 2009.3.30 by Long Lance]



posted on Apr, 4 2009 @ 07:12 AM
link   


i just find it hard to talk about things we have too little evidence on.


For evidence you could do worse than begin here Diana Evidence 1 and then here Diana Evidence 2

It's not evidence that's lacking, it's the will to act on it.



posted on Apr, 4 2009 @ 04:15 PM
link   
well, yes there are issues regarding timing (especially the Haider case), convenient alcoholism combined with speeding and in the case of Diana the question why she wasn't really delivered to an ER within any reasonable time, while she was still alive.


i do lean towards assassination on both accounts, though and i am by no means trying to dissuade. the issue isn't the fact itself, rather the methods which you think were employed. you cannot really reconstruct and decseisively prove a remote control murder, unless the killers were incompetent.

i did read a bit more on Haider's death, turns out you might even be running off on a tangent, as the car may have been standing still when he died by other means. i don't have quality footage, but it if it's true that both front tyres and the front end have been flattened, maybe somebody trapped him with tracks and hit him with a hydraulic hammer or bearer.

not my theory, just saying.

www.24heures.ch...


the real issue here is that media gets away with speedometers which get stuck or planted witnesses and artefacts. the number of people exposed to inconsistencies must be mind boggling, yet they can be supressed, somehow.

edit: better pic


[edit on 2009.4.4 by Long Lance]



posted on May, 9 2009 @ 03:53 PM
link   
Okay, well maybe try reading this... It would be really cool to get some feedback.


Princess Diana: The Boston Brakes



New evidence has emerged that Princess Diana was murdered in an MI6-organized ‘Boston brakes’ operation.

Following last year’s Royal Inquest debacle, which ruled out MI6 involvement in Diana’s death, new evidence has come to light suggesting the coroner and the jury might have got it wrong.

In their new book, Princess Diana: The Evidence, released in the UK in April, 2009, authors Jon King and John Beveridge present evidence that a highly sophisticated assassination technique was used to cause the princess’s vehicle to crash as it drove through the Alma tunnel, Paris, in the early hours of August 31st, 1997.

The ‘Boston brakes’, they reveal, is the most favoured assassination technique employed by the West’s intelligence services due to its deniability.

For many years following the princess’s death, the authors delved the smoke-and-mirrors underworld of political assassination, moving in circles populated by former special and elite forces—mercenaries, bodyguards, hired assassins.

Some of these crack military freelancers disclosed details of prior operations in which the ‘Boston brakes’ had been successfully used. Others who fought in Angola, home of Diana’s landmines campaign, spilled the beans about what was going on behind the scenes in the central African war zone, not least the dirty arms-for-oil deals carried out by MI6, French DGSE and the Bush-Cheney oil syndicate.

For obvious reasons some of the sources quoted in the book remain anonymous. But many are named.

Full article here: Princess Diana: A People's Inquiry

Does anyone give a monkey's about this topic any more or has everyone got bored with it -- just wondering as no one seems to be replying. Diana was murdered by MI6 and the CIA and I think it's really important to keep a profile going, otherwise they've won again, haven't they?

Come on guys, whay does anyone think about this????



posted on May, 9 2009 @ 03:55 PM
link   
I thought she was murdered because of her blood line not being "blue".



posted on May, 9 2009 @ 04:04 PM
link   


I thought she was murdered because of her blood line not being "blue".



Some people definitely think she was murdered because of her bloodline -- that she was descended from the 'wrong' royal strain, politically speaking, from the ancient Stuart and Merovingian bloodline, the 'messianic' Royal Bloodline of David and Solomon and Jesus.

I'm rambling. I need to do a bit of home work on this. I'll be back...



posted on May, 9 2009 @ 06:20 PM
link   
Okay, this is a post made by author Jon King on the Conscious Ape website forums.

It explains in precis what I was trying to say in my last post, about why Princess Diana was murdered because of her bloodline/ancestry. Can anyone else see what I'm seeing here?

The quote is as follows:


In my 2001 book, Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence (again co-authored with John Beveridge) I presented evidence that Diana was a bloodline descendant of the Stuart Royal Family (Britain's ancient Royal Family). The Stuarts in turn claimed descent from the Merovingian Kings of Middle Ages Europe, and they in their turn claimed descent from the Royal Bloodlines of ancient Israel and Judah (Judea). The evidence further suggested that this ‘messianic’ royal bloodline stretched back via certain of the Egyptian Pharaohs all the way to the ancient ‘priest kings’ of Ur and Sumer, and as such, those carrying the ‘ancient royal genes’ were perceived as bearers of what these days has come to be known as the ‘blue blood’, or the ‘royal blood’ – the Sang Raal or Holy Grail.

It’s a long and complex story, but in précis we discovered that this ‘Judaic’ or ‘messianic’ royal bloodline was and still is understood by the European aristocracy to possess something genetically special, and that for this reason it has been hijacked and usurped down the ages for political gain. We also discovered that whenever a true bloodline descendant – Princess Diana, for example – dared rear their heads and challenge the usurpers, they generally came a cropper. Other examples included the Stuart Pretender, Bonnie Prince Charlie; the Merovingian King, Dagobert II; and the 1st century ‘messianic’ King of Israel and Judah, Yeshua (known to history as Jesus). That, of course, is another story, all by itself.

With regard to the historical motives behind Diana’s death ... it became apparent as we began to unravel the history of this mysterious bloodline how the Stuarts had been manipulated to power in the 17th century by the Anglo-Dutch financial oligarchy who owned the Bank of England and who thus controlled Parliament. This oligarchy, we further discovered, manipulated the Stuarts to power specifically to facilitate the union of England and Scotland in its ambition to create a ‘United Kingdom’ and so centralize British political power in Westminster—which it did. Once this had been achieved the Stuarts were sent packing and the Dutch usurper William of Orange was installed on the Throne. But this was only a temporary measure. By the time the Bank of England had been effectively taken over by the new kids on the block – the Austro-German Rothschilds oligarchy – half a century later, the German House of Hanover (now the Windsors) had been shipped across the channel and was already installed as Britain’s new ‘royal family’. The anti-monarchy had arrived...


Source: Conscious Ape

I know it's a lot to take in, but when you really think about it it does make sense that the Rothschilds-backed Windsor monarchy of Great Britain would have felt threatened by someone like Diana carrying the pure 'messianic bloodline' gene.

There's another link here PRINCESS DIANA BLOODLINE LINK for the original book where this information can be found. It's called Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence and I think it came out in about 2002. Check it out, especially the 'bloodline conspiracy' section. It's enlightening...



posted on May, 28 2009 @ 04:58 AM
link   
looking for motives is fine, when you're trying to find out who did it.

the title of this thread is about how it was done, or more precisely if it was done by remote controlled cars. once the cars get scrapped, all material evidence is gone.

it would be very interesting whether remote control equipment has to be installed before an assassination or whether it's pre-installed from the factory and only needs to be activated. if it's the latter, plausibility could be established, only need to hack it on a scale that's no longer deniable.



posted on May, 28 2009 @ 06:53 AM
link   
well i thought she was killed because her blood line was blue , unlike the bloodline sitting at the crown as we speak,


care to elaborate on what the "boston brakes" are ?



posted on May, 28 2009 @ 07:04 AM
link   
Poor Diana! I don't know anything about the "Boston Brakes" but I do know that her death and the reaction from the palace were beyond suspicious. Practically screaming set up.

Crazy people do the damndest things and hope that we are so afraid of them that it will pass unnoticed or at best, unresolvable.

Good find on the stunningly similar news reports that are written almost verbatim, like the sentence was chosen from some sinister database and inserted into a "form letter".



posted on May, 28 2009 @ 08:33 AM
link   


care to elaborate on what the "boston brakes" are ?


As I understand it, the 'Boston brakes' is the name of a deniable assassination method used by the CIA and MI6. What makes this theory particularly credible is that it was revealed by Sir Ranulph Fiennes, the world famous explorer and former SAS officer.


The ‘Boston brakes’ method of assassination, Fiennes reveals, has been in use since at least the 1980s, and deploys a microchip transceiver which takes over the target vehicle’s steering and brakes at the critical moment.

The method, he says, was first deployed by the CIA in Boston, hence the name. But it has since been adopted by intelligence and security forces the world over, as well as by private security firms and their hit squads.

Fiennes also confirms that the death by ‘road traffic accident’ of SAS Major Michael Marman in England in 1986 was the result of a Boston brakes operation carried out by a private hit squad known as The Clinic.


Full article HERE...

What also adds weight to the theory that Diana’s death was the result of the ‘Boston brakes’ is that apparently her car was stolen at gunpoint prior to the crash and later found minus its EMS (Electronic Management System, effectively a microchip transceiver that controls the steering and brakes!). Presumably someone must have replaced the chip – could this have been when the ‘remote control chip’ was fitted to the car?



posted on May, 28 2009 @ 08:33 PM
link   
It seems to me that any ‘fly by wire’ type tech where the steering, brakes, etc. are controlled by electronics rather than mechanical means are particularly susceptible to RC. I do believe that both of the deaths mentioned in the OP are intelligence ops murders. In the case of Diana, she was set to embarrass the crown by marrying and giving birth to the child of an ‘outsider’. They tolerated Prince Harry (my favorite BTW), but Diana giving birth to a son of middle eastern descent was not something up with which they were prepared to put.



new topics

top topics



 
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join