It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
Explain to me how drug testing will make more money trickle down to the children of people on welfare.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
The worlds a mess, yes, it is not the kids fault, but many will be the next generation of dependent drug abusers.
The results provide robust evidence that the prevalence of binge drinking is strongly countercyclical. Furthermore, even among those who remain employed, binge drinking increased substantially during economic downturns. This combination of results suggests that recession-induced increases in the prevalence of binge drinking do not simply reflect an increased availability of leisure and may instead reflect the influence of economic stress.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Frick, I know more then one mother that smokes pot with their teens.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
I don't know what the answer is, and I don't mind my tax dollar going to the needy, heck I am needy, It just galls me when I see it being spent on crack, how is this fair?
Originally posted by DINSTAAR
No problem. It seems you believe welfare is a right. One can look at the constitution and find no indication of such a right. That is the basic fallacy of your entire line of thinking.
I don't believe people who don't get money stolen from them by an intrusive government are inferior to myself, so this question is irrelevant.
As for being subject to additional "Measures", I am subject to many more additional "Measures" to get my money including working for it, drug tests, being on time to work, and getting a portion of my money taken to pay for a vast bureaucracy to subjugate people into 'welfare' programs.
As is my money and all fruits of my labor but it is still taken from me for the "public good".
How is requiring drug tests for something that is not a Right wrong? People who work for the DMV take drug tests. Are we discriminating against people who work for the DMV?
Originally posted by intrepid
Plenty easy. If you are on welfare that means you are most likely living below poverty standards. If there's money going out on things other than the necessities that speaks VOLUMES.
Originally posted by intrepid
The parent(s) need to have the welfare revoked and take the children into proper care. One where the welfare of the children come before addiction.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Wrong, I am angry with people who refuse to work, and use the system to get high,
What about SSI?
Do you know how many young alcoholics and substance abusers get SSI?
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Do you know how many young alcoholics and substance abusers get SSI?
Originally posted by Highground
I cain't make muh livin gettin an acktuwal jawb, so I haz to get welfarez so I can do my drugz and nao I cant even get muh welfare!
WOW... thought I was on "the front" website for a second
Originally posted by skeptic1
reply to post by JohnnyElohim
It isn't about persecution.
It isn't about punishment. It is about starting to make a broken system work like it was meant to work.
Originally posted by N.B.A.Y.S.O.H
The whole "Chav" thing in the UK is the welfare class.
In the UK there are whole houseing estates where every family on them is on welfare, and every member of a fmaily is claming the dole.
They go stright from school on to the dole and dont ever bother to get a job or look for one.
Originally posted by skeptic1
reply to post by JohnnyElohim
It isn't about persecution.
It isn't about punishment. It is about starting to make a broken system work like it was meant to work.
Originally posted by skeptic1
I like this idea.
Many jobs in this country require random drug testing, so why not welfare and state assistance recipients?
Three in Stockton face charges in alleged $2 million food stamp scheme
STOCKTON - A Stockton man, his brother and daughter have been indicted on charges they ran a food stamp fraud scheme netting $2 million from a downtown smoke shop, the U.S. Attorney's Office in Sacramento said Friday.
Brothers Ahmad Khan, 51, and Mumraiz Khan, 48, have been charged with conspiracy, food stamp fraud and money laundering, among other charges. Ahmad Khan's daughter, Naheed Khan, 23, has been charged with conspiracy.
In the alleged scheme, the three bought food stamps at 50 cents on the dollar from customers at the Smoke Shop & Snack at 425 E. Miner Avenue. The shop had been redeeming the food stamps for five and a half years, prosecutors said.
Originally posted by Tayesin
Why stop there?
Why not mandate for Politician's to be drug tested too?
The Police?
Then Lawyers, Barristers and Judges?