Originally posted by skeptic1
Here is a little more on the scientific (and cultural and religious) views on when life begins.
There is no consensus, even (and especially) in the scientific community.
When does life begin?
Well you're not being totally honest here are you.
Like the other poster said, it's biology 101 LIFE begins at conception what we call that life, to sanitize and insulate us from the grim reality of
what I imagine would or at least should be one of the most tragic decisions a woman would ever be compelled to have to make as a very last resort
under the harshest mitigating circumstances.
I have seen the OP being ridiculed, his video labled propaganda, as if the word propaganda invalidates the information you all have judged as
propaganda, with most of you judging it, do so in the same voice you say you refused to see it. Another claimed he had the op's convictions shoved
down his throat, but I would bet the farm that he was pretty safe on the otherside of that monitor and no one is waterboarding anyone into any
religion either. I think what he felt being shoved down his throat was the lump of guilt being convicted by the OP but I could be wrong. I doubt it
.
I have argued this topic many times and pro choice and many other terms they use to insulate those who actually buy into this illogical argument about
choice, is the choice to be able to execute terminate kill murder, euthanize, a human embro, infant, baby, zygote, fetus, I don't care what you call
it, someone dies, blood is spilled and it is very unfortunate we see people defending the right to do this as if it was something they know they are
going to do and not as if they would regret having to.
I guess you don't have any foresight and know your promiscuity or lack of responsibility may need the added insurance or get out of jail free card to
escape assuming the responsibilty, a consequence of sex because as we all know,, most people that do this were raped or were incestuously violated. I
have seen some here givijng statistic's on how these people would have had a crappy life. I ask, compared to what? They are DEAD! It's a paradox
you cannot reconcile.
Morally it is wrong and the choice she makes leaves a biological argument for double homicides in pregnant murder cases when what is a baby during the
killing of a pregnant woman when the same act in an abortion is only tissue like removing a wart when it is executed during infanticidal abortions of
Births.
This isn't a life AFTER it leaves the womb, make no mistake it is called "Abortion" or to abort something already started already alive and the
choice she makes either forces a male who may not have wanted to finance a child to 18 but he is forced to regardless.
If it is ONLY about a woman's right to choose, he has child support and no get out of jail free card. Then we have a guy who may be left with the
other alternative, a excruciatingly painfull experience of hoplessness as the mother of his son or daughter plays God, ( ironic isn't it) and has his
offspring ripped to shreads and executed but not to worry the baby won't care and the father doesn't have to carry it for nine WHOLE MONTHS!
Just pays for something he may want a choice about also for the kids entire life.
It is a tragic and unfortunate circumstance and GUY,, it is TOO have to do with our choice. Don't BUY that crap that it is only about woman.
Man up fight for BOTH and pay your child support
This was the consensus on HOW this question shouold be approched
However, understanding the basis for societal moral standards appears to be the key to discerning how to approach the question of when human
life begins. Science has not been able to give a definitive answer to this question.
[edit on 26-3-2009 by Aermacchi]
