It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Threat of dirty bombs 'increased'

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 24 2009 @ 06:46 PM
link   

Threat of dirty bombs 'increased'


news.bbc.co.uk

There is an increased risk terrorists could get hold of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons to attack the UK, the Home Office has said.

The assessment comes as Home Secretary Jacqui Smith unveiled a new UK strategy to tackle an evolved terrorist threat.

It warns failed states such as Iraq have made it easier to obtain materials for weapons such as dirty bombs.

Ms Smith said the threat is "severe" - meaning an attack is "highly likely" and "could happen without warning".

Dirty bomb
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on Mar, 24 2009 @ 06:46 PM
link   
The UK government is finally coming into line with what SOLLOG has been saying for years, that Dirty Bombs would be used on cities in the future.

If you don't know, Sollog is the guy who predicted the rise of Obama in late 2007, when alternative news sources were wrongly predicting Hillary would win.

He was also the one who correctly predicted the stock market crash at a time when the Dow Jones was at 13,500.

Sollog's warnings have been hidden by both the mainstream and alternative media, but this story is proof that Sollog knows what he is talking about. Dirty bombs are "highly likely" according to the above BBC news article. As predicted first on sollog.com many years ago.

How long before governments agree with what Sollog said back in 1995 that Israel, Rome and Washington DC will be struck by Nuclear Terrorism?

Or will they hide the Sollog warnings until after those cities are nuked ?

news.bbc.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)

[edit on 24-3-2009 by TheTimeMachine]



posted on Mar, 24 2009 @ 07:03 PM
link   
I find it funny that they call Iraq a "failed state." Gee, I wonder why it might have failed?

LOL. Absurd.



posted on Mar, 24 2009 @ 07:11 PM
link   
Good observation. Yeah, the retards in the UK government finally admit their failure with Iraq.



posted on Mar, 24 2009 @ 07:39 PM
link   
Gone are the days of reassurance from leaders (pffft!)....their job now is to keep you scared and needing their (false) leadership.

I wonder how long till they ban "stink bombs"?



posted on Mar, 24 2009 @ 07:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheComte
I find it funny that they call Iraq a "failed state." Gee, I wonder why it might have failed?

LOL. Absurd.


What they did with Iraq and turn it in to fail state same going to happen with UK mark my words.



posted on Mar, 24 2009 @ 08:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by nerbot
Gone are the days of reassurance from leaders (pffft!)....their job now is to keep you scared and needing their (false) leadership.

I wonder how long till they ban "stink bombs"?



I hear you....

Politics of Fear - food for thought.


Google Video Link


[edit on 24-3-2009 by Maxmars]



posted on Mar, 25 2009 @ 08:28 AM
link   
Anyone who buys this "warning" needs a psychiatric assessment.

The UK Government sure has become adept at pumping out mass hysteria about terrorist plots that never come to fruition.

Like the 2006 "Transatlantic Plot", where we were supposed to believe terrorists could mix and produce a liquid explosive on board a plane lavatory within 2 to 3 hours without arousing any suspicion and then approach the cockpit of the aircraft to detonate it.


I don't buy this for a second:

"There is a concern now among officials in the Home Office that the chances of them getting hold of this material have increased in a world of failed states, in a world of easy availability of radiological material in hospitals and in a world of greatly increased smuggling of these kinds of materials."


Well then, two perfect solutions for you:

1. Stop creating the dire international conditions that give rise to failed states.

2. Secure your hospitals.

[edit on 25/3/09 by The Godfather of Conspira]



posted on Mar, 25 2009 @ 09:27 AM
link   
New anti-terror strategy warns of chemical attack threat
www.guardian.co.uk...

The UK Strategy for Countering International Terrorism
www.statewatch.org...



posted on Mar, 25 2009 @ 10:01 AM
link   
reply to post by TheTimeMachine
 


This was discussed on c2c.
It was indicated that their terror level was just below an imminent attack.

As a side note, they discuassed they difference between mi5 and mi6.

Basicly, MI5 is like the US's F.B.I. for local issues in the country.

Basicly MI6 is like the US's C.I.A. and is their international spy agency.



posted on Mar, 25 2009 @ 10:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by mrmonsoon
reply to post by TheTimeMachine
 


As a side note, they discuassed they difference between mi5 and mi6.

Basicly, MI5 is like the US's F.B.I. for local issues in the country.

Basicly MI6 is like the US's C.I.A. and is their international spy agency.


Isn't this common knowledge in America?



posted on Mar, 25 2009 @ 10:11 AM
link   
well,
I will put it this way...

I did not know.


I believe not everyone in US knows this, but if I am alone in not knowing this, so be it.

It is ATS's purpose to educate all of us in many different area's and even about many different countries.

I learned something new to "me", and this is always a good thing.



posted on Mar, 25 2009 @ 10:15 AM
link   
I never believe anything the British government pumps out. They are half a step away from a totalitarian state like 1984. All they do is unlawfully spy on their citizens and take away their rights.


Dictatorship comes not with war but with applause.



posted on Mar, 25 2009 @ 10:23 AM
link   
Either way I hate to see this kind of fear mongering, it always seems to be advance warning for eminent changes against the freedoms of the individual in America.

I pray that it does not come to pass but I would like to hear more about this guy who has made all the past predictions, did I miss a link to his work?

Eminent is a very stark sounding announcement, I do not think that it should be public knowledge without transparency of specifics...



posted on Mar, 25 2009 @ 10:24 AM
link   
reply to post by Merriman Weir
 


No, it is not common knowledge in America. I have learned something new...



posted on Mar, 25 2009 @ 10:47 AM
link   
reply to post by TheTimeMachine
 


Wow, another threat by wee Jackie yet again. Oops I meant warning.

Second one I have read about in 2 days.

Maybe tomorrow she will release a statement saying that she just wants us to buy more toilet roll. It might help the economy to give them more funds to monitor the invisible enemies.

We got dirty bomb threats, suicide bomb threats, anarchist threats, financial threats and much more!

She speaks about things like this as if they are rapidly evolving life forms of their own


She thinks up so much threats that she forgets to look in a mirror when it comes to real threats.

[edit on 25-3-2009 by XXXN3O]



posted on Mar, 25 2009 @ 12:43 PM
link   
reply to post by antar
 


Sollog, who posted a dirty bomb warning several years ago, also posted a warning about a "911 EMERGENCY" exactly three years to the very day before the 9/11 attacks.

Here is the original date-stamped warning :

911 Warning by Sollog

[edit on 25-3-2009 by TheTimeMachine]



posted on Mar, 26 2009 @ 02:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by mrmonsoon
well,
I will put it this way...

I did not know.


I believe not everyone in US knows this, but if I am alone in not knowing this, so be it.

It is ATS's purpose to educate all of us in many different area's and even about many different countries.

I learned something new to "me", and this is always a good thing.



Originally posted by antar
No, it is not common knowledge in America. I have learned something new...


Thanks for the replies. My question wasn't a particularly 'snide' one or loaded in anyway. I just found it curious that American 'alphabet' agencies seem to be well-known and roughly understood on this side of the Atlantic, but the British Intelligence agencies seem to be a bit of a mystery over there.

I asked three people (who aren't really into conspiracies &c.) and they all alluded to the idea of the FBI being ostensibly 'internal' and the 'CIA' being 'external' with two of them mentioning about the CIA's involvement in foreign countries and drugs!

Perhaps, it's a pop-culture thing where American exposure to British intelligence is limited to James Bond or something.

[edit on 26-3-2009 by Merriman Weir]




top topics



 
2

log in

join