It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Rockefeller: Internet is "Number One National Hazard"

page: 13
<< 10  11  12    14  15 >>

log in


posted on May, 6 2009 @ 06:43 AM
This is one of the questions I asked Gerald Celente during my interview with him on Monday.

I specifically asked about an "internet false flag" due to Rockefeller saying it is the "number one hazard" and could there be a crack down on the internet.

What did he say about it?

Stay tuned............

posted on May, 6 2009 @ 10:54 AM
Internet is the source of [almost] all knowledge.
Foreign hackers are a threat to national security..

Its like all roads must be blocked, no its the wreckless drivers who make it unsafe...

Its interesting to see more and more similarities between the US and China concerning "monitoring " the Internet
A free community should embrace the internet and people should decide for themselves what to filter and what not..

[edit on 6-5-2009 by Foppezao]

posted on May, 7 2009 @ 05:58 PM
reply to post by DimensionalDetective

Because of the Net, a good 20% of the populace knows that these a-holes conspired to have 3000 innocents murdered to wage an unjust war of aggression, and that's not good for the good will capital of American governance..

posted on May, 7 2009 @ 07:03 PM
screw rockefeller, what does he know,
not a damn thing except how to steal and swindel.

posted on May, 7 2009 @ 07:57 PM
Darn getting flack from some of the primo conspiracy agents.

Like Rockefeller and conspiracy is like Resses pieces, chocolate
and peanut butter.

As American as Apple Pie.

Glad he popped up to show his Illuminati colors to everyone.
He can now sit back on his Tesla patents to keep them out
of circulation.

Not the patents in public circulation and perhaps not caring about
some unsubmitted ones as well after all the disinfo on Tesla
has been so good he even talked to ETs and their agents.

posted on May, 11 2009 @ 12:57 AM
Why can't we just keep our most important infra-structures
like the electricty grid, and others, OFF the internet. Don't we have
the technology? If it's expensive, just print some more money.

posted on May, 11 2009 @ 01:10 AM
Shutting down the internet would be the first act of martial law, it's not wrong by their eyes but every company like google that suffers just suffers because the general cause of destroying the internet benefits their agenda, yet if someone tries and release an electronic cigarette OH NOEZESS!!!!!!!!

posted on May, 16 2009 @ 03:23 AM
jay-rod Rockefeller may be all to soon upset through this President's tenacity in clinging to the young folks so responsible for his November/08 election victory.


posted on May, 24 2009 @ 02:08 PM
reply to post by DimensionalDetective

Thank you so much! It is sad that our world is starting to resemble a prison. Good post and great information to keep me hungry for freedom and knowledge. You rock!

posted on May, 25 2009 @ 01:35 AM

Originally posted by drwizardphd
I'm guessing Mr. Rockefeller typed his family name into google and got a whole face-full of truth.

Can't have that now, can we?

Big deal, won't do anything about it. They take more of our rights, we bitch, nothing changes. They ARE about to take this over OFFICIALLY. Look up bills they are trying to pass. I, personally, am for posting a note on their doors; "Constitution of the United States" with short "explanations" of "Bill of Rights" and "Declaration of Independence." The difference in "terrorist" and "patriot" depends on time period, and WHO rights the news story. In England, our relatives were "Terrorists."

Question ANYTHING and be called "Anti-semite" and SOON to be "Terrorist." Everyone on this site could be rounded up, arrested, and charged with "treason" or other crap. WE ARE ALLOWING THIS though. THE CONTRACTS we sign to work, if we violate them, we get fired. OR WORSE. What do we do when the police, military, and especially our "senate" and "congress" are puppets for another country? Iraq? Afghanistan? Pakistan? Iran? Those are not our fights. Those are the fights of ONE country. ONE place that does the same as NAZIS were alleged to have done. I WAS NOT THERE, I DON'T TRUST EVERYTHING I READ.

Now, I do see homes bulldozed these days, people killed, children shot, Red Cross vehicles shot at, and saw VIDEO clips of some calling others dogs. The thing about African Americans is they KNEW they were wronged. The thing about the U.S., is we are slaves and don't even realize it. They take our money, they make everything in profit, they allow and HELP horrific acts take place so that they advance THEIR methods. WHO WAS WARNED and which group DID NOT GO TO WORK at the WTC on 9/11? The truth is out there. I only see NOW and look back in history. FALSE FLAGS? Lies, stealing from us, using people like OBAMA to harness hope just to CONTINUE THE SAME CRIMES?

Most because, honestly, since 11-22-1963, Dallas, our U.S. govt has been hijacked. It was taking place before then, but why need to "Negotiate" with the President when you can kill one of the last good ones, then put in puppets since then who PARDON each other???!!! Consider this--Hitler becomes President today, then PARDONS all Nazis and they MUST NOT be procecuted, MUST NOT be pursued. What the heck would anyone say? "Horrible, why allow this?!!" Instead, people sit around drugged up, being CAGED SLOWLY, and all while they use AMERICAN BRAND NAME to do their bidding. Senate, congress, SCOTUS, POTUS; YOU DO WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT, you work for US; you're warned, don't do anything we don't approve of. People FOUGHT, DIED, for freedom, and we FREELY give it away. I'd rather live and die free, then be caged and killed slowly by things the CIA, NSA set up. Anyone smart enough will know this "country" I alluded to above. Wake up, the recent meeting in the White House was " We will do this, you SAY that, but we do this, that is it." Obama is not dumb, don't bite the hand that FED him. His life is set if he FOLLOWS THE PLAN.

When the world launches it's weapons, when the SHTF, they will be in bunkers miles below the surface, watching it all. This is what they want. I saw what they did to JFK. Sure, he cheated on his wife. Trying to end the FED, seeking peace, standing up to the CIA (somewhat), who he fired, who he was going to fire, NOT GIVING a certain "country" the nuke bomb=why he died. I know these things, all of this with links, texts, testimony from insiders, etc. Some of which were DEATHBED confessionals. The game is up, if I get killed, I am free. JFK was in power, he had SOME shots at stopping the grand scheme. I am nothing, a nobody. I know nothing will change. BRIBERY, they call this "lobbying", what a certain "country" wants; this determines their votes. If they don't comply, they get no funding, they don't get to live the good life. If they oppose the plan, well, "Accidents happen" is a fact of life. LOOK AT IT ALL. Think brakes always go out? Think random violence just "happens"? Know that if I die, it is because some have passion about the CONSTITUTION and a natural sway of people.

posted on Jun, 7 2009 @ 02:49 AM
reply to post by drwizardphd

tim and eric. yes.

posted on Jun, 7 2009 @ 10:41 PM
I've said it before and I will continue to say it in every thread where I find it relevant: START YOUR INFORMATION HOARD TODAY!

Many of you have hoarded food, water, and/or ammo. But how many have horded INFORMATION? How many just assume that the websites and e-books that have opened their minds will just keep floating out there in cyberspace freely forever? Its an easy assumption to make, but a dangerous one. The Powers That Be are now rolling up their sleeves and going to work on INTERNET FREEDOM.

In the face of this alarming and rapid development, I encourage ALL of you to start collecting information on "fringe" topics...anything from ancient Gnostic doctrines to stuff on survivalism to the real history of finance to Illuminati and NWO-related PDF e-books to interviews with celebrateted conspiracy theoriests, and so on...get yourself another hard drive, a stack of discs, a handful of UBS devices, whatever...and start downloading like mad. I'm concentrating on documents and e-books because I can fit more of them into my infor hoard: they take up less room than vids or audio clips, and often contain more detailed information.

I am compelled by the legal state of the nation to remind everyone to do everything legally and above careful of copyright infringement and remember big brother is ALREADY watching.

Become an info packrat...start today, don't wait.

posted on Jun, 8 2009 @ 11:35 PM
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions

posted on Jun, 10 2009 @ 03:34 AM
Yes of course Rockefeller says the internet is a "national hazard." He is one of the global corporate elite, and to see why/when they decided to tackle the internet, check this out:

If you have heard of "The Project for the New American Century," (google their name and 9/11 and see the connections), you may have heard of their report published in September 2000, precisely one year before the 9/11 attacks. It is titled "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century" and is available in .pdf format from their website. In it, they outline proposed goals and spending to strengthen the United States' defenses and military power. They outline ten main goals, and one of them is to "Control the new international commons of space and 'cyberspace'." (see box on page 12 of 90 in the .pdf document)

On page 51 of 90, they say "tomorrow's U.S. armed forces must meet three new missions" and one of these three missions is "control of space and cyberspace."

So, here is clear proof the US military has had this idea for at least a decade.

This .pdf document is a very intriguing read, and just look at the very last page of the document.... and take note of the 27 Project Participants and who they work for. This project was done by folks from the US Military, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, a guy from The Weekly Standard (owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation), Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Northrup Grumman Corporation, etc etc. (Not a coincidence that most of these groups comprising this "non-profit educational organization" greatly reap the benefits of wartime "national defense" business).

The .pdf document can be accessed here:

posted on Jun, 16 2009 @ 06:41 AM
Hey guys,

I'm quite new to the forum and this may be a long post...
I'm not really familiar with all the details of the NWO conspiracies going on around here but I'm professionally involved with the Internet and security so I've been following the news.

For quite some time it seems appearent to me that a new scenario is being set up very similar to the 9/11. The paranoia of “Chinese Hackers = #1 Threat To National Security” is the new thing after the muslim terrorists.
Just please bear with me for a while and check the news below. I’ve been seeing them frequently on the security news websites I follow and it’s driving me crazy seeing the BS, seeing the way the scenario is being build slowly.

Probably the real reason somehow ties to the rockefellers, NWO, banking industry etc. etc. But the way I see it, they presented the muslims as the threat to the western society and used the fear and the paranoia to grant themselves the rights to wage wars as they wish. Now they are presenting the “threat from chinese hackers” as the number 1 threat, which is transforming into the threat of the Internet by the way, and most probably soon they will stage another event (ike 9/11, most probably related to the networks) which they will use to wage war on China, Iran or whoever they want.

Without losing your attention (if you are paying any) here are the news I have collected for the past several months. First four are some examples of the way the paranoia is being built with phony news.

(Britain could be shut down by hackers from China, intelligence experts warn, 29 Mar 2009)

(Canadians find vast computer spy network, Mar 28, 2009) Guess who is to blame?

(China Implicated Over Conficker Virus, 03.30.2009)

(Defense Department insider charged with espionage, May 19 2009)

This one is a small example of the staged events:

(US power grid hacked by cyber-spies, 8 April 2009)

And finally, the results when US justifies doing anything because it’s national security is allegedly threatened.

(Cyber attack could bring U.S. military response, 11 May 2009)

(Pentagon Seeks High School Hackers, 21 May 2009)

Please share your thoughts. I feel like the dots are connecting magically and this should be very obvious but what do you guys think?

posted on Jun, 16 2009 @ 06:50 AM
reply to post by bilb_o

I think that you are on the right track but I think that the issue is more complicated than just setting up China as our future enemy. I think that the internet is a bona fide threat to the powers that be. They are seeing that they can't control what information people have access to now. It isn't as simple as buying up all of the media outlets to push your agenda any longer. They face a real problem with this and I am willing to bet that there are some dastardly plans floating around to fix it. Look at the current situation in Iran. It would appear that the MSM would have preferred that we all just ignore the revolution... but thanks to the internet, we all got to see and hear what was really happening.

posted on Jun, 16 2009 @ 07:08 AM
Well even more like 9/11 then... I wathced a video where Alex Jones said something about Osama Bin Laden being the swiss army knife and him being used as an excuse for several things.
I agree that the situation is more complicated than just the future enemy china and probably the future enemy china is the swiss army knife for the next step of the NWO plan.
They'll attack the rebellious asian countries(the ones being an obstacle against the NWO like china, korea) because of the alleged cyberwar (which is BS and I completely agree with Marcus Ranum) and then go on saying "we can't protect the borders of our cyberspace so we'll shut it off from the rest of the world". Then they'll control the quarantined US internet and the information which comes in and out.
I definetly wouldn't be suprised at all if these turned out to be more than my wild imagination

[edit on 16-6-2009 by bilb_o]

posted on Jun, 16 2009 @ 07:11 AM
reply to post by bilb_o

I definetly wouldn't be suprised at all if these turned out to be more than my wild imagination

Neither would I. I think the only thing that will really prevent that from becoming a reality is if our country collapses before they get a chance to do it.

posted on Jun, 16 2009 @ 03:49 PM
Ha! Star and Flag!

So one of the godfathers of the NWO is getting worried about the internet? GOOD! I bet him and all his pals in the Bilderburgs, CFR, and Tri-Lateral Commission are also worried as hell about the internet. Worried elites make me happy. While it might mean they will be trying to crack down on the internet, in order to do so, they are gonna have to show all their cards while doing so.

Personally, I don't believe you can ever really crush the internet.

posted on Jun, 16 2009 @ 04:55 PM
I can't help but think of a post I made some months ago on a thread saying Obama was going to target the internet. I don't really have the time to find it now, but it went along the lines of:

"Internet censorship for your protection."

Some kind of false flag will be devised and staged by the PTB as an excuse to limit the sites we can visit, and the propaganda will flow forth from the MSM so that the majority of the public encourage the new restriction on our freedom, those who don't will be labelled as "nutters" and the rest will be too engrossed in the newest crap on tv to notice (big brother 12 anyone?).

It's already happening slowly in other countries.

The frog in boiling water analogy is accurate. It will happen so slowly that people will not notice, just the same as has happened with many laws passed that restrict freedom of speech in the "real world". Laws all over the so-called democratic world.

I went on a demonstration about a month ago that was against the corruption of the UK parliament in the wake of the expenses scandal. I was filmed by police officers even after I had left that demonstration and was about my lawful business. I had not committed, nor was I committing a crime, and yet there was a police camera man across the road filming me. I can expect any photos or film he took to be held on a database of dissidents for at least seven years, despite this being ruled as illegal.

If you believe that such a plan for world domination could exist, then you must believe that it has taken many generations to progress this far, and therefore the masters of this plan have the patience to wait just one more generation for their plans to come to fruition.

Believe me, they are already well underway, and the majority of the population has no idea, or even advocate the idea of protesters being treated as criminals.

<< 10  11  12    14  15 >>

log in