posted on Mar, 23 2009 @ 09:30 AM
If a source reports false information, then it's not reputable.
I guess that is exactly what I am getting at. It seems like depending on who you talk to, many sources seem to report false information, or at least
start off with real info, and add their own twists to it to make it newsworthy, or more exciting "depressing" to catch the readers or listeners
attention. "FOX" is a perfect example of that.
OR they don't give the whole story, only reporting about what they think we should know and not the whole "true" story. Is there such a thing as a
fully reputable, trustworthy source for news?
One source that I use to trust was BBC, but they even have suspicion lately about some of their articles.
Oh well, guess it's just a personal question I have to decide on my own who to trust. Or as Fox Mulder always said...Trust No One