Originally posted by mepatriot
ZZZ: Since when is absolute dissmissal of one of the most acknowledged high-level conspiratorial agencies in this country (The CFR) a pre-requisite
for being a moderator on a site that advertises itself as basically a home for conspiracy theorists?? Very, very odd...
Since when is not believeing in every conspiracy that comes to town an issue? Do, you believe that everyone (especially those that question) need to
follow your ramblings as fact?
Maybe you'll notice that you have discrepancies in your story as well. So because I don't blindly believe you...I get a "checked off" on your
list. Well, gee...so sorry to not be a blind sheep. You claim the whole country is on fact blind to the truth, but then expect everyone to fall into
step with your theories with nothing but your word? Interesting.
Now, you seem to be looking to who would "benefit" from 9/11 and then of course that must be the responsible party, which is of course a conspiracy.
This is an often used method, but hardly definitive of guilt. If you go through the history books and mechanically applies the "who benefits"
principle, you will find it a poor guide to actual understanding. Did the USA entice the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor just so it could test the
A-bomb? Maybe the Japanese wanted some "culling" due to overcrowding and so they masterminded the whole matter?
The "who benefits" process has another issue. You could plan to kill your father, knowing you would get the inheritance money, but what are the
consequences of plotting to do so with an entire country on the edge of recession? Bush Sr. didn't get much war "popularity" and lost his
re-election. It is true that Presidents often get blamed for things that fail during thier time in office, so you believe that the entire country,
with all the random factors included...fell for the whole matter with not one shred of actual proof coming to light? Nothing but speculation of
Ten members of the government could possibly conspire to kill 1,000 people in another country and keep the secret forever, but it is much less likely
that those same people could conspire to kill 1,000 Americans and be sure that it would remain a complete secret.
You certainly can identify events that need an explanation. But, a puzzle becomes addictive. You find one, and then another, and another. It's
mysterious. It is dramatic, vivid, and entirely human. There seems to be a steady progress and it seems like an investigation, although jaded by
preconcieved notions and fueled by the desire for retribution. It just overlooks certain matters of logic, method, and prioritization.
You imply with your theories, that everything was good and with Bush removed all will be good again. We pull the weed, but leave the garden alone. It
is convenient and seductive. We can reject Bush himself, but not the government as a whole, specific companies but not capitalism, specific
Moderators but not the owners of the site, other posters, or the media in general. We reject those we suspect of manipulating, but not basic
Well, congrats to you because you have migrated the matter from Conspiracy Theory to a Scapegoat Theory. You are trying to establish that with
Republicans in general, those right-wing, big business, oil-hunting crazy loons. You glorify those who were not involved supposedly, like the
Democratic party. They were not in office, so certainly they had no part in the matter. It must have been Bush. It could not have been terrorists,
they had nothing to gain...it had to be Bush.
No matter how lacking of serious evidence.
Now you take attention away from discussing the world situation to investigate "who knew what and when". You spend energy on Bush, with no credible
true evidence, instead of where our focus needs to be. Could we apply the "who benifits" model and think that the Democrats planned everything to
discredit Bush because of the election, and then take back over the country? Sure we could and then in that light, they look guilty too. So, where
does your theory end and reality kick in? Where does the evidence actually come out or does it stay a theory that you wish all of us to hash and
re-hash unto death?