Don't discount North Korea in fact, be weary!, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 19-4-2009 @ 02:21 AM by Zaphod58
The US doesn't want to resume the war with North Korea, because it would take weeks to build up the forces for the way we fight, and our supply lines would be huge. We'd also most likely end up having to fly fighters in from either Japan or Okinawa, which would severely limit their ability to stay in the area and protect ground forces. All of our resources would be tied up in resupply, heading to North Korea, and it would have to be constant.

I was in on an exercise for if war started up in Korea again, and it was insane. They were going to essentially shut down Honolulu International Airport, and use taxiways Bravo, Reef Bravo, Reef Echo, runways 4L and 4R just for fighter parking, and would have a continuous rotation of tankers flying to almost the halfway point and back to get fighters to Hawaii. From there, we would be able to take them in groups of 6 per KC-10 and 4-6 per KC-135R depending on how much fuel they'd let the R models offload. Almost every tanker in the inventory would be involved just in getting the fighters to Korea. We'd have to have several dozen minimum in theater just to support around the clock air operations. Subtract a couple dozen more to support the bombers flying from the mainland to hit targets, and recovering in Guam, as well as the C-5s and C-17s constantly going back and forth. A C-5 going non-stop California to Japan, over Hawaii needed 6 KC-135R models out of Hickam to make it. At least four would offload, and depending on winds, one to two of the others would be needed. If any couldn't offload, they would have to land on either Guam, or at Hickam because they couldn't make it.


reply posted on 19-4-2009 @ 02:29 AM by alyosha1981
reply to post by Zaphod58



Don't forget about our assets in the south, as well as their willingness to support a major U.S opperation with utmost cooperation. An extensive air campagin would take the conbined efforts of the U.s South Korea and japan.


reply posted on 19-4-2009 @ 02:42 AM by alyosha1981
reply to post by YouAreDreaming



I agree as stated in the OP, but I believe in the very real possibility of stratigic nuclear strike to sensitive North Korean targets. As you have seen recently they have openly threatened nuclear war.


reply posted on 19-4-2009 @ 02:46 AM by Zaphod58
reply to post by Retikx



The exercise that I witnessed was around 2000, well after the B-2 was in inventory. Yes, the B-2s would go in, along with B-52s, and B-1s, but the primary Close Air Support for the ground troops (and there would be a lot of them) would be fighters. It takes a LOT to get that many fighters over there.


reply posted on 19-4-2009 @ 02:47 AM by alyosha1981
reply to post by Retikx



I have faith in the United States millitary, but I have been to Korea and been breifed about what would happen if the North came south, and let me tell you it's not pretty, not only that but they do possess nuclear warheads that could be delivered by artie so they would be able to decimate seoul within hours at most, IMO followed by strategic nuclear by the U.S or South Korea.


reply posted on 19-4-2009 @ 02:48 AM by YouAreDreaming
reply to post by alyosha1981



Absolutely, this isn't the normal conventional war the US faces, it really comes down to a fast nuclear strike. Big blows for a big problem.

Now are we going to see this, is this going to be a reality? Hard to say, I hope not but it seems with all the tensions in the region, the game is escalated and well in play.



reply posted on 19-4-2009 @ 02:51 AM by alyosha1981
reply to post by Zaphod58



Correct but don't forget about the South Korean Airforce as well as the Japeneese Airforce, both would be plenty to act while we mobilize any air assets we needed, fighters would most likly be used to attack hard targets while kiowa and apache heli's used for anti armor and troops.


reply posted on 19-4-2009 @ 02:53 AM by alyosha1981
reply to post by YouAreDreaming



Not only that but with the rumor of K.J.I not running the country, who knows [who] is in charge over there and as such the man is crazy anyhow and it wouldn't be too far fetched to assume that he would want to see his "mighty country" go to war before he dies.


reply posted on 19-4-2009 @ 03:02 AM by YouAreDreaming
reply to post by alyosha1981



Interesting that you bring that up as I was pondering also a self-proclaiming deity knowing he is dying having kind of a suicidal death wish that involves his new WMD.

Again, speculating the mind of a madman, but a madman indeed.


reply posted on 19-4-2009 @ 03:05 AM by alyosha1981
reply to post by YouAreDreaming



Who knows what he is capable of and what his plans are for his people maybe if wasn't so sick we would not be dealing with the likelyhood of this scenario.


reply posted on 19-4-2009 @ 03:16 AM by alyosha1981
reply to post by plumranch




In addition, they do have a very large and powerfull military that the leader devotes almost all of the countries food and money to. Point being their a force to be reckoned with make no mistake.


reply posted on 19-4-2009 @ 04:12 AM by YouAreDreaming
reply to post by alyosha1981



Even if they don't destroy the US, they will certainly destroy South Korea and badly hurt Japan in what ever they decide to do.

They might get a luck shot on the US but I doubt that highly... as in US soil.



reply posted on 19-4-2009 @ 04:19 AM by alyosha1981
reply to post by YouAreDreaming



Well as od yet they dodn't possess any ballistic tec that is capable of carrying any type of payload to U.S soil. We can only hope that they don't procure any of that said tech.


reply posted on 19-4-2009 @ 04:52 AM by alyosha1981
reply to post by ugie1028



You make some good points, as well I have stated my faith in the U.S, Japan and South Korea I just don't think that North Korea is as weak as many would have us believe. Nuke? try a few hundred at least and some of those are from the former soviet union bought with money ment to give aid to the North Koreans.


reply posted on 19-4-2009 @ 04:57 AM by ugie1028
Originally posted by alyosha1981
reply to
post by ugie1028



You make some good points, as well I have stated my faith in the U.S, Japan and South Korea I just don't think that North Korea is as weak as many would have us believe. Nuke? try a few hundred at least and some of those are from the former soviet union bought with money ment to give aid to the North Koreans.


where is the evidence that NK bought nukes from russia?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Nano Drones Flying in Formation
  Posted 11 days ago with 15 member flags
FPS RUSSIA
  Posted 16 days ago with 7 member flags
Spinel Thin Transparent Ceramic Armor defeats Barrett .50 Cal BMG
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
Defective Ammunition Warning
  Posted 4 days ago with 6 member flags
Self-steering Bullet Researched
  Posted 13 days ago with 5 member flags
Shockrounds take out three of your five senses.
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Taking the Crowd Out of Firing 155mm Artillery.
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags