Originally posted by D.Duck
CameronFox

First you should take KT's challenge since it's what I posted first.

You are jumping out of line. Second, KT is banned here for political reasons, so he can't come on here to take up your challenge.

Although if he is allowed to come back here, I'm sure he wouldn't be afraid to take your challenge after you take his.

Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
If 93 crashed in Shanksville then what landed in Cleveland

My husband] and I and six other fellow [...] employees were on the 8 am flight from Boston to Los Angeles on Tuesday, but we were on the Delta flight [1989], the one out of three 8am flights departing Logan that did not get hijacked. Instead, we were forced to make an emergency landing in Cleveland because there were reports that a bomb or hijacking was taking place on our plane. The pilot had radioed that there was suspicious activity in the cabin since one of the passengers was speaking urgently on his cellphone and ignored repeated flight attendant requests to stop using his cell phone while in flight. Also, there was an irregularity in the passenger manifest because there were two people [with the same middle eastern name] who were listed but only one aboard.

Air traffic controllers believed they had a hijacked plane in the air over Ohio on Sept. 11. They just didn't know which plane.

During tense moments that morning at Cleveland Air Route Traffic Control Center, the first guess was that Delta Flight 1989 was hijacked, not United Airlines Flight 93.

“We knew right away we had a problem. The first thought was, "Is that Delta 1989?' ” said Rick Kettell, manager of the Federal Aviation Administration's busiest regional center.

and disembarked passengers into the NASA terminal side of the airport? They have the news of that day also saying that Flt93 landed safely...

"A KC-135 had to come back to the hangar," says Wessel, as if realizing for the first time that this aircraft may have caused some undue confusion. A team of scientists from the Johnson Space Center in Houston had flown to Cleveland on this KC-135 to conduct micro-gravity experiments. (Also known as "the vomit comet," KC-135's are used to simulate weightlessness. The plane soars to high altitudes, then falls back toward the ground, giving passengers a few seconds of zero-G experience. Scenes for the Tom Hanks movie Apollo 13 were filmed in one.)

The visiting scientists could not return to Houston as scheduled on 9/11 once the FAA ordered all planes to land. "After the facility closed, we had to take those scientists to a hotel." The scientists, dressed as civilians, were boarded onto shuttle buses.

Originally posted by trueforger
CF with all due respect the challenge was NOT statement(s),but verifyable pictoral evidence,which ought,in my opinion be a dated video of the cranes in operation as digging a thirty foot deep hole is not a backhoe and dozer job.A hole would contain all evidence which would make it easy to find.All of it that wasn't burned.Besides,that hole looks like an old hole,eroded,even.Wasn't it shot down,anyway?These liars can't reconcile their cover stories.

Originally posted by CameronFoxOh I have taken it. I collected all the evidence surrounding the flight and deliberate crash of flight 93. I determined by the FACTS: Flight 93 crashed on an old strip mine in Shansksville, PA.

Originally posted by CameronFox
I provided a video. This was from a plane crash many years ago. This plane was not shot down. This tragedy had a very similar crash scene. Please, I encourage you to watch it.

Originally posted by screwedagain
If you took it, did you pass it? I'd personally love to see your evidence that wins the challenge in the video.

Originally posted by tezzajw

Notice how CameronFox is using a typical debunker tactic, trying to steer the thread away from the original post.

This is a thread about Killtown's challenge for the alleged crash of the alleged Flight 93. It's got nothing to do with Cameron's other plane crash.

Stay on topic, CameronFox.