It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Conspiracists Push Bilderberger Conspiracy

page: 1
<<   2 >>

log in


posted on Mar, 21 2009 @ 09:37 PM

Conspiracists Push Bilderberger Conspiracy

For decades, conspiracy theorists have viewed the Bilderberg group, an international organization made up of political, financial, academic and military heavyweights that comes together annually to discuss world affairs, as similar to the Trilateral Commission or the Council on Foreign Relations -- two groups comprised of influential movers and shakers who, some say, control world events from behind the scenes.
And now, some in the Obama administration who have taken part in Bilderberg conferences in the past are gaining attention for their alleged involvement in a secret bid for worldwide domination.
(visit the link for the full news article)

posted on Mar, 21 2009 @ 09:37 PM
This is a very interesting article for a few reasons...being that it is on a "mainstream" news source (AOL) makes it significant, but most importantly the poll results show that mere 20% of those polled have heard of this group, BUT 70% polled felt that the group sounds suspicious. The comments on there too are interesting as from what I saw most comments must have been generated by the 30%, who don't find the group suspicious or (as I have heard from this site) Disinfo agents
(visit the link for the full news article)

[edit on 21-3-2009 by mkultraangel]

posted on Mar, 21 2009 @ 10:05 PM
Yeah. The poll results are what really surprised me. 70% of the readers thought it was suspicious. Never thought I would see that.

It does not surprise me though that people in the Obama admin are/were participating in these meetings. Our government has been corrupted from the bottom up.

Star and Flag.

[edit on 21-3-2009 by Striker122]

posted on Mar, 21 2009 @ 10:42 PM
I've never understood the lack of public outrage at the Bilderberger meetings. I don't need any conspiracy theories to know that elected representatives attending secret and unreported meetings with representatives of foreign countries in order to plan their strategies for the next year is a very bad thing.

In a land based on freedom we should not allow our government to operate and plan without our knowledge.

posted on Mar, 21 2009 @ 11:57 PM
reply to post by Shadowflux

I am pretty sure it's covered in the Constitution. Our public officials can never have a secret meeting with anyone from another country. It is Treason. And I will repeat it again. The only punishment for Treason is death.
Right now, that would suit just fine.

posted on Mar, 22 2009 @ 12:51 PM
Yes punishment for treason is death, but no way would the leaders do that to their own people. Disinfo agents are defintely out there on those comments and I am extremely happy that 70% are finding this group to be suspicious. Obviously it is when the leaders are meeting secretly making plans that they never mention to their people about. No surprise as well that Obama and his officials are involved as Obama is just another puppett president that is controlled by the Illuminati, bankers, and those in control.

posted on Mar, 22 2009 @ 01:30 PM
Did anyone else read the link at the bottom of the article?

Leads to another article posted on ..

Definately worth the read ... and it just adds more (IMO) credibility to the theory that Bilderbergs have their hands in all political activity.

The very last sentance on the three page article says ..

“You’d be hard pressed to find an administration that hasn’t reached into those ranks into the last 20, 30, 40 years. “

And they say we're nuts for saying the Bilderbergers have the policital elite of America in their pocket.. pfffft

posted on Mar, 22 2009 @ 02:00 PM
Yes, I think there is enough information between the AOL and Politico articles to make the Bilderberg Group seem suspicious, but the very fact that the phrases "conspiracists" and "conspiracy theorists" are used over and over makes it seem like if you believe that this group may be part of something bigger (NWO) then you will be like those crazy conspiracists...the more I read the comments and the articles, the more this bothers me. It seems like it does less to implicate them and more to discredit us (the crazy conspiracy theorists!)

posted on Mar, 22 2009 @ 02:04 PM
The 70% is a little surprising since most prefer blinders. But...there have been plenty of movies and books through the years that are perhaps penetrating the numb populace.

posted on Mar, 22 2009 @ 02:18 PM

Originally posted by mkultraangel
Yes, I think there is enough information between the AOL and Politico articles to make the Bilderberg Group seem suspicious, but the very fact that the phrases "conspiracists" and "conspiracy theorists" are used over and over makes it seem like if you believe that this group may be part of something bigger (NWO) then you will be like those crazy conspiracists...the more I read the comments and the articles, the more this bothers me. It seems like it does less to implicate them and more to discredit us (the crazy conspiracy theorists!)

Well, you do know don't you that if the MSM repeats something often enough eventually the people will believe them, right?

i.e. terrorists, al quida (sp?), terrorist threat ... hence ... conspricy theorists, conspiracists, wack jobs, nuts, fools ... lol

posted on Mar, 22 2009 @ 03:06 PM
Of course I realize that main-stream media has a way of shaping "reality". I should know as I have been a part of media myself. However, I first thought that the article was intentioned to simply bring up a topic and rightfully source the information to the people, who discovered the suspiciousness (conspiracy theorists). However, I then realized that the headline said it all "Conspiracists PUSH Bilderberger Conspiracy".... Honestly, what I found the most worthy of posting were the poll results of the 70% of people polled, feeling the Bilderbergs are suspicious. So regardless of MSM intentions, most people are not buying it!

posted on Mar, 22 2009 @ 04:16 PM
Well with the way things are going now-days and with the information contained in the two articles it really doesn't surpise me too much that 70% find things a bit suspicious. Who knows, maybe this will begin to 'expose' the truth?

Of course, then exposing the truth leads to the fact that what part of the truth will the MSM expose?

I did find it a bit "odd" that in the politico article they claim to have gotten information from "an attendee" since these goings on are supposed to be super-secret and all. Not to mention the fact that this "information" was from a 2004 meeting. (old news so to speak that is just now being released?)

Maybe (and here's the conspiricy theorist in me coming out) it's all a set-up to leak just a small bit of OLD information to take some of the pressure off? Like maybe if they admit that the political administration has "reached into those ranks" for the last 20-40 years that will be enough to "satisfy" the normal joe and try to display things in a more "realistic" light so as to debunk the consipiricy angle? I don't know, maybe I'm just grasping at straws here..

posted on Mar, 22 2009 @ 04:43 PM
reply to post by cnichols

I completely agree with you on your ideas. There is something "off" about this whole "investigative" article. I found the following information on Wikipedia and this may explain what it going's almost exactly what you are describing.

"A limited hangout is a form of deception, misdirection, or coverup often associated with intelligence agencies involving a release or "mea culpa" type of confession of only part of a set of previously hidden sensitive information, that establishes credibility for the one releasing the information who by the very act of confession appears to be "coming clean" and acting with integrity; but in actuality by withholding key facts is protecting a deeper crime and those who could be exposed if the whole truth came out. In effect, if an array of offenses or misdeeds is suspected, this confession admits to a lesser offense while covering up the greater ones.

A limited hangout typically is a response to lower the pressure felt from inquisitive investigators pursuing clues that threaten to expose everything, and the disclosure is often combined with red herrings or propaganda elements that lead to false trails, distractions, or ideological disinformation; thus allowing covert or criminal elements to continue in their improper activities.

Victor Marchetti wrote: "A 'limited hangout' is spy jargon for a favorite and frequently used gimmick of the clandestine professionals. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting - sometimes even volunteering - some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further."

posted on Mar, 22 2009 @ 05:20 PM
Right, so if the source says "Sure, they attended the meeting but golly, it didn't have ANYthing to do with his political appointment, even though his political appointment only happened AFTER he attended said meeting. It's all just a COINCIDENCE!"

Therefore it's now a Coincidence and not a Conspiracy and they brush it off and continue on with their secret meetings that no one really knows anything about.

Disinfo at it's best.

The American People will now see the name "Bilderberg" and blow it off as a bunch of conspiricy theorists doing what they do best, building conspiracies where none exist.

posted on Mar, 22 2009 @ 07:04 PM
Well put....I have been purusing (sp?) this site and found another interesting Bilderberg link that had this to say:

My main problem is the secrecy. When so many people with so much power get together in one place I think we are owed an explanation of what is going on.

Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma bomber, is led away from court
Timothy McVeigh was among those who believed the conspiracy theory

Mr Gosling seizes on a quote from Will Hutton, the British economist and a former Bilderberg delegate, who likened it to the annual WEF gathering where "the consensus established is the backdrop against which policy is made worldwide".

"One of the first places I heard about the determination of US forces to attack Iraq was from leaks that came out of the 2002 Bilderberg meeting," says Mr Gosling.

Now if making the connection with McVeigh to other believers in a conspiracy doesn't dissuade people from looking further, I don't know what else would!

posted on Mar, 22 2009 @ 08:27 PM
Obama is a puppet for Bilderberg/NWO. The NWO are puppets for the Pope. The Pope is a puppet for God.

Everyone is a puppet for someone.

posted on Mar, 22 2009 @ 08:47 PM
Does it seem suspicious to anyone that the MSM is exposing The Bilderbergs? After all, is'nt it us "conspiracists" who have been saying all along that secret societies such as The Bilderbergs control the MSM? Seems that it is AOL and Politico PUSHING the Bilderberg Conspiracy.

I have no doubt that The Bilderbergs are a nasty bunch of thugs who are hell bent on controling the earth and its people. But honestly, it scares me to think that they are allowing themselves to be exposed in this way. Is this some part of a plan? Are they baiting us into riots? Do they want everybody know about their treasonous behavior? And then what?

It can only be bad when evil comes out from the shadows.

posted on Mar, 22 2009 @ 10:04 PM
I have been reading posts on ATS for years and never felt the push to join and post until I read through this one.

Let's think about this. Main steam media is talking about corruption all of a sudden. In the past they have done every thing they could to distract and discredit those who questioned any official story. Now...... the controllers have to eventually make there move and we all know the main stream media is there main weapon for control.

I believe they are now trying hard to wake those they wanted sleeping not so long ago. The reason being..... in order for there plans to work they need the people to fight, protest, riot so they can declare marshal law and take full control and consolidate there power through force.

I think this plan will fail. We all go through stages of emotion when we first realize we have been manipulated or lied to. Some have a hard time getting out of anger or fear. They know this and believe they can control us with this in mind. They are expecting the masses to revolt and it is just not happening.

The bailout is not working so now they are taking it up a notch. I am of the belief that we as a collective create our own reality and they now this. In order for there plain to work they need the majority to feel this is the end of the world and alot of people do not realize there negative thoughts feed the collective, which then manifests into reality.

Stay positive, nonviolent and know good will prevail over evil. I think we as the knowing minority need to stay positive and not fall into this obvious trap.

They would Like the people of ATS to think this is discloser, but they us the "Truth" movement as a tool to spead the fear they need in order to stay in power. (Example:Alex Jones= Project Mocking Bird)

I think we as the knowing minority need to stay positive and not fall for this obvious trap.

[edit on 22-3-2009 by Eyesa2diffcolors]

posted on Mar, 22 2009 @ 11:15 PM
Thanks "Eyesa2" for contributing to the post...I hope you keep posting as you had many interesting things to say.

I think that since there was a poll on AOL with the article, that there is obviously an interest in knowing how many people think that the group is that it is known there is such a high % of the public who don't trust these people NOW WHAT? Maybe the MSM will give up some info on another conspiracy to throw us off the trail...with these numbers on the poll though, it will have to be something BIG!!!!

posted on Mar, 22 2009 @ 11:54 PM
It doesn't matter who says it or how many statistics they throw up in the air, people won't and don't care who has clandestine meetings, if its the Bilders , CFR or Trilaterals, as long as they have their TV, mobile phones, video games and porn, as well as good tasting 'healthy' food .
They'll be distracted whilst the veils are pulled over our eyes, or should I say Black hoods over our heads ala Guantanamo .
People say " Oh thats scary and not very nice, shouldn't be allowed " then quickly turn back to watch Oprah or some other brain numbing 'reality show'.
People simply don't care about their intelligence anymore, they are moore than happy to 'dumb down' .
Even if stats are thrown in their faces the people will simply ignore the facts and hope that someone else does the job of eradicating or removing of these 'sinister' organisations as they can't be botered to get off their fat a*ses.
Someone else can take the risk, make the sacrifice , die for them, people are scared of losing their lives in the fight for freedom for themselves and their familes, People don't realise that if no one can be bothered to stand up and say NO MORE to TPTB then TPTB will simply move their insideous plans along and win with no resistance at all. Then the people will complain and whine and say " why didn't anyone stop them?"
TPTB will say " You had the chance , we were weaker back then and you COULD'VE stopped us, but we distracted you with food, sex and TV" and you thanked us for it, now stop moaning and get back to serving us slaves".

So no more complaining, unless WE do something we will ALL lose, DON'T wait for someone else to do it, take action now, or simply keep quiet and hope to stay UNDER TPTB radar when they own you abd your children.

top topics

<<   2 >>

log in