Originally posted by _BoneZ_
posted by mosey
none of us have absolute truth about anything
One thing that is ABSOLUTE TRUTH is that thousands of people watched a plane slam into the south tower with their own eyes.
and thats not only an ABSOLUTE LIE ABSOLUTELY, but as usual you conveniently fail to mention there were TONS of witnesses who contradict the witnesses
you and the oct claim saw planes.
but this is just more PROOF of your BIAS here and inability to be OBJECTIVE to show ALL THE FACTS and story in full CONTEXT which only further
destroys your credibility as a truth seeker and adds evidence that you're nothing more than a disinfo agent/shill posing as a truther.
whatsmore, you also fail to mention how MOST of the so called witnesses that "saw" a plane slam into the south tower, are connected to the MEDIA and
GOVERNMENT.
even further than that, witnesses who used or rely on the LIVE AKA FAKED/questionable FOOTAGE to support their claims they SAW PLANES HITTING THE
TOWERS, is LAUGHABLE at best and beyond pathetic for you to use as evidence supporting your argument.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
It was recorded by at least 43 different video cameras by major media,
all of which contain evidence of FAKERY and therefore absurd for you to use questionable/tainted evidence as a basis for your argument let alone
proving it.
your hypocrisy and double standards are ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
independent journalists AND home videos from private citizens.
who nearly all have been shown to have connections to the MEDIA or GOVERNMENT.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Every single one showing the same plane and the same sounds.
which again is a A TOTAL LIE.
but even if that were true, you're again talking about the SAME FOOTAGE thats been proven to contain FAKERY.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Both plane impacts also left plane debris on the ground.
yet not one single piece of wreckage from the four alleged planes and debris field etc can be confirmed or identified forensically or otherwise with
serial numbers.
yet you continue using this pathetic faulty logic and supposed "evidence" to support your argument.
no wonder you're credibility continues to plummet faster than the non-existent dive bombing of flight 175.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
One of them being a smoking jet engine that the tv fakery cult would rather say is planted. The planters must've taken a torch to it right before
they planted it so that it could be all steamy and warm.
how do you know for sure what lengths they'd go to? the fact is YOU DON'T... so how can you possibly use that rationale or HEARSAY/speculation as a
basis for your argument as if its real evidence or fact?
but still, the issue of it being steamy and warm like a pile of dog# is IRRELEVANT if theres not one single piece of wreckage from the four alleged
planes and debris field etc can be confirmed or identified forensically or otherwise with serial numbers.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
king9072
- planes don't melt into buildings
If the steel columns had failed, I'd almost agree, but the columns didn't fail. Only the connectors did.
huh??
your reply makes no sense at all.
what does connectors failing have to do with a plane MELDING/MELTING into the building as the video evidence shows?
its a FACT, the visual evidence, the physics and damage of the impact was not consistent with the damage that occured or what newtonian laws say
should have occured.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
You keep forgetting about the B-25 the melded into the Empire State building in 1945. Must've been tv fakery then even though they didn't have
tv's:
unless you can produce LIVE FOOTAGE and/or VIDEO of that example, its WORTHLESS as evidence proving or disproving anything.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
king9072
things in motion fail to stay in motion when they slam into steel
Once again, the steel columns didn't fail. The connectors did.
which is irrelevant to whats at-issue.
king9072
- Theres no way that an alluminam airliner hull can travel right through a skyscraper, protruding out the opposite site IN TACT
bonez
Wow, BLATANT disinfo in that claim. There was no exit hole in the south tower for a real fuselage to have exited:
of course,,, because in realty no real boeing (fuselage) plane was used.
And there was no plane inserted into the live stream for a fake fuselage to have exited:
again your argument makes no sense. if there was no real plane, there wouldn't be an exit hole. if the plane was faked, there still wouldn't be one
either.
so no # sherlock. its just more of your twisted logic
king
That you can't claim a plane is "Dive bombing" when the best media propaganda clearly shows the plane level and cruising
bonez
Oops, more blatant disinfo again. Two shots of the second plane coming in from a higher altitude. The plane didn't level out until the last approx. 3
seconds:
not only are there vids that show no such dive, but faa aviation engineers have said its BS as well. If just one of these are true, your argument
fails.
king907
- that planes far exceeding their maximum recommended speed are hard to control, and are liable to break apart at such extreme speeds
bonez
Obviously not as indicated by the 43 different angles of the second plane slamming into the south tower.
which are all fake.
king9072
Maximum speeds for airliners cannot be achieved at sea level
bonez
They can if they're coming down from a higher altitude as shown in the 2 animated images I posted above. You would need some kind of understanding of
flight dynamics to understand
which you obviously don't have... nor have you seen the evidence that contradicts what you claim.
[edit on 19-4-2009 by matrixNIN11]
