It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Video - No real planes hit World Trade Center (Continuous Pieces)

page: 8
7
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 11 2009 @ 01:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by SGTChas
Okay, I'm no expert on planes, however I do know that jet fuel that flash burns at 1300*+ cannot even weaken steel thet does not begin to melt until held at 2800*+ for 8 hours. I've used thermite det cord to cut steel beams when the building was still standing after being gutted by fires caused by HEP rounds. Building fires, JP4, JP54, and JPA1 do not melt steel structural beams. Been there, done that and got the tee shirt.


[edit on 4/10/2009 by SGTChas]


Actually steel will weaken quite a bit at those temperatures, in degrees F. Other people on the site have used thermite, det cord, and other energetic materials and can also say "Been there, done that and got the tee shirt" in several exciting locales around the world.




posted on Apr, 11 2009 @ 01:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by _BoneZ_

Except It doesn't take much more than common sense to see the OBVIOUS FAKERY thats pointed out and going on.



Yeah, except that the people with the REAL common sense, you know, the entire 9/11 truth movement and the rest of the whole world, don't agree or subscribe to the NPT disinfo.


except saying the ENTIRE truth movement and rest of the world doesn't agree or subscribe to NPT, is itself DISINFO.

nice try though pal... too bad you'd never be able to back that lie up.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Only the few NPT cult followers.
[edit on 10-4-2009 by _BoneZ_]


I recall when the truth movement BEGAN, many also made the same ignorant and laughable CLAIM.

NPT is in its infancy. And when people actually do an indepth investigation into the evidence and facts, they realize its not as nonsensical as you'd like people to believe.

The real Npt will only continue to gain strength as more and more see the evidence and ignore those like you who try to pump in disinfo and derail intelligent discourse.

i know its hard for you to accept, but -resistance is futile-



posted on Apr, 11 2009 @ 05:01 AM
link   
I used to think the NPT was lunacy and didn't have time for it, I didn't understand it. Myself and many others just saw a plane fly into a building and you tell me it's not real? But after listening to the noise produced by the no planers, studying the theories, listening to the arguments and variety of opinions it soon becomes apparent they have a pretty good case for no planes on 9/11. Seriously, NPT is not trying to spread disinfo on purpose I think these people just genuinely want to get to the bottom of the story with the whole planes deal. And quite right that they should too!

I think if there was nothing to it, the subject would of been dropped ages ago but I don't see any signs of that yet and like the above poster mentioned I think this theory is gaining momentum as more people start to wake up to it.



posted on Apr, 11 2009 @ 07:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by matrixNIN11
except saying the ENTIRE truth movement and rest of the world doesn't agree or subscribe to NPT, is itself DISINFO. nice try though pal... too bad you'd never be able to back that lie up.

I've backed it up time and time again. You just choose to ignore facts. I don't see NPT being discussed anywhere else in the world except a very few forums that you're ALLOWED to discuss it on, like this forum.

You already know that not one single 9/11 truth organization supports NPT and most have banned the discussion of NPT on their forums.



Originally posted by matrixNIN11
when people actually do an indepth investigation into the evidence and facts, they realize its not as nonsensical as you'd like people to believe.

We know you like to ignore facts and evidence, so it's not shocking when you type things like this. Very smart people, including myself, Arabesque and several others have already done an in-depth investigation into everything NPT'ers claim. We've found it all to be totally baseless and false. NPT'ers also like to distort, lie, purposefully deceive and mislead their followers into believing falsities that cannot be proven.

If NPT was truthful and had one single piece of verifiable evidence, somebody in the 9/11 truth movement would support it. But because NPT has never been truthful and has ZERO verifiable evidence, NPT will never, ever be supported by real and professional 9/11 researchers.



posted on Apr, 11 2009 @ 07:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by matrixNIN11
NPT is in its infancy. And when people actually do an indepth investigation into the evidence and facts, they realize its not as nonsensical as you'd like people to believe.

I feel like the one piece of evidence required for an "in depth" investigation is still sorely missing. A clear, high-quality video, composed of clear, high-quality source videos.

Please sir... a link to such a video. If the No Plane Theory is so convincing, certainly such a video must exist.



posted on Apr, 11 2009 @ 10:39 AM
link   
Perhaps it is important for the "No Plane Theory" proponents to understand the history of this particular 9/11 conspiracy disinformation.

The idea of "no planes" was first proposed a few years ago by a grandmother posting under the name of "WebFairy" who grossly misunderstood poorly captured stills of poorly compressed digital videos. The original musings of the WebFairy were largely ignored until one very obnoxious jumped into the NYC 9/11 Truth organization with spittle, vulgarities, violent confrontations, and obscene posters placed within a church. I'm referring to Nico Haupt, the Conspiracy Fakery disinformation expert tasked with disrupting the NYC 9/11 Truth organization which was, at the time, gaining political traction.

For your edification --

Nico Haupt, the person who popularized the no plan theory, attacking peaceful 9/11 protestors -- CAUTION: Many Obscenities:


More -- (I have been at a few of the group meetings shown here)



It is important to consider the company you keep.



posted on Apr, 11 2009 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by mister.old.school
 


I've heard the stories about Nico. These videos (that I haven't seen before) just put the nail in the coffin. Unbelievable.

Gotta compliment WAC on their restraint.



posted on Apr, 11 2009 @ 06:30 PM
link   
reply to post by pteridine
 


HEP rounds burn at a tad bit more than 1300*+; never saw a building hit with multiple HEP rounds and then burned completely out by the fire that they caused fail. Several other high rise buildings and skyscrapers around the world have had much hotter and longer sustained fires and never failed. JPL tested the same structural steel that was used in building WTC from the Madrid fire and concluded it had not weakened after hours at 1472*+. But perhaps at WTC the laws of physics were suspended.

whatreallyhappened.com... tml?q=spain_fire_2005.html

[edit on 4/11/2009 by SGTChas]


Mod Edit: Review This Link: ABOUT ATS: General ATS discussion etiquette: Posting In All Bold

[edit on 4/13/2009 by semperfortis]



posted on Apr, 11 2009 @ 08:20 PM
link   
reply to post by SGTChas
 

Did they bother to test the floor joist elements and attachment bolts or didn't they think that the weakest parts would fail first? Remember that failing floor elements caused the outer columns to be pulled inwards before collapse.
HESH rounds may burn hot and cause fires but thousands of gallons of Jet-A provide more total heat and give office fires a . start.



posted on Apr, 16 2009 @ 07:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by matrixNIN11
except saying the ENTIRE truth movement and rest of the world doesn't agree or subscribe to NPT, is itself DISINFO. nice try though pal... too bad you'd never be able to back that lie up.



Originally posted by _BoneZ_
I've backed it up time and time again.


and as i said: "too bad you'd never be able to back that lie up."

You think repeating that robotic line of bs enough times will eventually make it true?
mmmmmmkay.

Your tactics are nothing less than a cheap attempt at mind-control and brain-washing... which sadly does sometimes work to a certain extent on the gullible and weak-minded.



Originally posted by _BoneZ_
You just choose to ignore facts. I don't see NPT being discussed anywhere else in the world except a very few forums that you're ALLOWED to discuss it on, like this forum.


first of all as i said, even if that were true, all that it means is that an advanced concept such as NPT is relatively NEW to the discussion of 911 and takes far more investigation and critical thinking/analysis to grasp than other aspects of the 911 hoax. However those who have the ability to put personal biases and ego's aside to consider and do a FULL investigation on ALL the evidence, will agree NPT isn't the type of bs and nonsense you'd like people to believe.

Second of all, you like MOST have a RETARDED understanding of what the true and real NPT is even about, so its no wonder your mind is as closed as it is and unable to comprehend the IRREFUTABLE evidence and FACTS that PROVE the REAL NPT beyond a doubt.

and Third, the fact that you even admit MOST FORUMS and people in general (due to ignorance) resist and refuse to allow any real intelligent discourse about NPT, further proves my point about how NPT is still in its infancy and going thru SIMILAR BIRTH PANGS that the TRUTH MOVEMENT itself went through back during its beginnings... It took YEARS for most to comprehend the evidence and years for sites, facts etc to be created and embraced. SAME THINGS HAPPENING now with everything from NPT to Judy Wood and other un-popular, alternative and less known or accepted theories and evidence.

But the true danger in the type of IGNORANCE you're pushing and perpetuating is borderline NAZIesque.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
You already know that not one single 9/11 truth organization supports NPT and most have banned the discussion of NPT on their forums.


whether thats completely true or not is IRRELEVANT for the reasons I already explained above.

so WHO CARES?

It doesn't negate or make NPT any less credible

Sorry.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by matrixNIN11
when people actually do an indepth investigation into the evidence and facts, they realize its not as nonsensical as you'd like people to believe."

We know you like to ignore facts and evidence,


what facts and evidence?


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
so it's not shocking when you type things like this. Very smart people, including myself, Arabesque


oh you mean that dude who hosts the debunked and defunked lawson vid?

LOL

don't flatter yourselves. Ego's as big as yours have made it that much easier to take down and are prone to failure by design.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
and several others have already done an in-depth investigation into everything NPT'ers claim. We've found it all to be totally baseless and false.


except the FACTS and EVIDENCE proves otherwise. oh well.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
NPT'ers also like to distort, lie, purposefully deceive and mislead their followers into believing falsities that cannot be proven.


except the FACTS and EVIDENCE proves otherwise.

but talking about the Pot calling the kettle black.



Originally posted by _BoneZ_
If NPT was truthful and had one single piece of verifiable evidence, somebody in the 9/11 truth movement would support it. But because NPT has never been truthful and has ZERO verifiable evidence, NPT will never, ever be supported by real and professional 9/11 researchers.


exactly what MOST then and even TODAY continue to say about the movement in general.

So who cares?

Aside from the fact most might not support npt because they know nothing about it or are in denial and ignorant of the evidence, that most don't accept or support npt, doesn't disprove the FACTS AND EVIDENCE that validates it.

Its that simple. You've disproven NOTHING other than your incredible ignorance, denial and close mind.

But when all is said and done, no one really cares about your OPINION or alleged evidence you CLAIM to have that disproves npt when anyone with a brain can see there's TONZ of counter-evidence against what you claim.

Npt is HERE TO STAY and will continue to grow like it is and has as the evidence and facts spread and more people do real research on it. The more people like you try to suppress and argue the actual evidence, the more and faster NPT will grow.

Resistance is FUTILE



[edit on 16-4-2009 by matrixNIN11]



posted on Apr, 16 2009 @ 10:38 PM
link   
reply to post by matrixNIN11
 


My, what textbook reverse psychology we have going on in that entire post. You're not fooling anyone. Your game has already been exposed.



Originally posted by matrixNIN11
anyone with a brain can see there's TONZ of counter-evidence against what you claim

Yet we still ask over and over for you to present just one tiny little piece of this irrefutable evidence.

- Just one name of a media whistleblower who acknowledges that the media did take part in carrying out 9/11.

- Just one video from the original source, analyzed in video software to show how the media faked the videos, or how independent journalists faked their videos, OR HOW PRIVATE CITIZENS FAKED THEIR HOME VIDEOS.

What, you don't have any of this? THEN YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE! All you have is speculation and theory topped off with alot of disinfo, deception and misleading.

I mean, come on. Give us SOMETHING that is tangible and verifiable. All you're doing is making these large posts and all they say is BLAH BLAH BLAH. Post some of this irrefutable evidence already. Put up or shut up.

Oh by the way, there's a whole lot of scientists, physicists, engineers, architects, firefighters, pilots, etc. in the 9/11 truth movement that have brains, yet nobody supports NPT. So sorry.....



posted on Apr, 18 2009 @ 03:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by _BoneZ_

My, what textbook reverse psychology we have going on in that entire post. You're not fooling anyone. Your game has already been exposed.


you're projecting bonez... easy does it son.

and do the letters P K B mean anything to you?


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
anyone with a brain can see there's TONZ of counter-evidence against what you claim

Yet we still ask over and over for you to present just one tiny little piece of this irrefutable evidence.


Myself and many others have... you just play your usual game of denial and argue irrefutable facts and evidence... even if the perps themselves came forward, you'd deny it... those who know your M/O could care less about your OPINION since anyone with a brain can see you have no real interest in the real truth when its not convenient or fits your agenda.

but then, what specifically are you referring to anyway.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
- Just one name of a media whistleblower who acknowledges that the media did take part in carrying out 9/11.


whether or not such a person exists is irrelevant and meaningless to proving there was fakery. If evidence of fakery exists in the so-called live footage etc, then the MSM are implicated and are part of the 9/11 hoax. Its that simple.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
- Just one video from the original source,
analyzed in video software to show how the media faked the videos, or how independent journalists faked their videos, OR HOW PRIVATE CITIZENS FAKED THEIR HOME VIDEOS.


yeah whatever M8.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Anyways, now why don't *YOU* show us just ONE video from what you term/describe as the "ORIGINAL SOURCE" that you claim isn't faked and shows proof of a real boeing 767s/757s ie flights 175, 11, 93 and 77.

Your argument has been answered, addressed and debunked repeatedly ad naseum.

Asserting the video evidence and analysis such docs like Sept Clues doesn't prove *anything* is laughable at best and nothing more than your biased OPINION which totally ignores the actual video evidence.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
I mean, come on. Give us SOMETHING that is tangible and verifiable. All you're doing is making these large posts and all they say is BLAH BLAH BLAH. Post some of this irrefutable evidence already. Put up or shut up.


i and others have over and over... you're just in denial.

and what i've presented above is merely a fraction of the evidence out there that PROVES beyond a doubt the MSM were complicit in the 911 hoax. It not only proves there was fakery, but it presents irrefutable visual evidence there were no real planes used as the OCT claims.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
What, you don't have any of this? THEN YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE! All you have is speculation and theory topped off with alot of disinfo, deception and misleading.


wheres your proof and evidence that the OCT is true? show me a single video that clearly shows flight 175 or 11.

If you RPT'rs want to argue that NPT is BS because the footage in question (such as what Sept Clues has used in their analysis) is not from the ORIGINAL BROADCAST FOOTAGE and/or isn't trustworthy/has anomalies etc because its simply due to youtube compression and quality loss etc, then please show everyone a link to footage that you believe IS REAL and the type of un-tampered broadcast footage showing the evidence of REAL PLANES; SPECIFICIALLY FLIGHT 11 and 175.

Unless you can offer that type of evidence, then your RPT isn't anymore logical or valid than NPT and what you claim NPT lacks.

but then again, most RPT'rs like you have no concept of what the true NPT is even about.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Oh by the way, there's a whole lot of scientists, physicists, engineers, architects, firefighters, pilots, etc. in the 9/11 truth movement that have brains, yet nobody supports NPT. So sorry.....


Well since I've already answered and debunked that argument here
www.abovetopsecret.com...
for which you have yet to refute and show exactly how and where its wrong, there's no need to do it again.


[edit on 18-4-2009 by matrixNIN11]



posted on Apr, 18 2009 @ 08:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by matrixNIN11
anyone with a brain can see you have no real interest in the real truth when its not convenient or fits your agenda.

So you're saying that the millions of people that make up the 9/11 truth movement all around the world have no brains? It's called the TRUTH movement for a reason. You'd think if your "research" was really truthful, it would be embraced by the truth movement. But the total opposite has happened.



Originally posted by matrixNIN11
yeah whatever M8

See, that's what I thought. You were asked to provide evidence that home videos were faked and that's all you can come up with? Yeah whatever? Looks like someone is backed into a corner. It's not surprising, though, as there is no evidence for you to perpetrate......unless you make it up like a true disinfo artist would.



Originally posted by matrixNIN11
why don't *YOU* show us just ONE video from what you term/describe as the "ORIGINAL SOURCE"

As has been stated by me and others time and time again, it wouldn't matter to you what video you were shown or whether it was the original or not, it would still be fake to you, no matter what.

Further, YOU are making the claim that there were no planes when the entire world knows otherwise, so YOU have to back up those claims with REAL tangible, verifiable evidence. But you give us yet another long post of blah blah blah.



Originally posted by matrixNIN11
what i've presented above is merely a fraction of the evidence out there that PROVES beyond a doubt the MSM were complicit in the 911 hoax

As I've just stated, you haven't presented anything but a long post of blah blah blah. If you had evidence that really proved beyond a doubt, the entire truth movement would embrace it. Scientists, physicists, engineers, etc. would be all over NPT. But they're not. They ran the OTHER way. Deemed NPT as disinfo, banned the discussion of NPT.

The lost cause that is NPT is circling around the toilet on it's way down the drain.



Originally posted by matrixNIN11
wheres your proof and evidence that the OCT is true? show me a single video that clearly shows flight 175 or 11.

As I've stated again and AGAIN, since YOU are making the claim that there were no planes, YOU have to show CLEARLY that there were none. You can't do it and everybody knows it.

I've already shown this before. 43 angles of the second plane impact from media, independent, and home videos:

www.youtube.com...



Disinfo is disinfo whether some people can comprehend why it's disinfo or not.



posted on Apr, 18 2009 @ 12:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by _BoneZ_
So you're saying that the millions of people that make up the 9/11 truth movement all around the world have no brains?


I'm saying the millions of people either don't know about NPT, don't understand it due to a lack of research, or are in denial when confronted by the irrefutable evidence (like you).

NO OBJECTIVE HONEST AND REASONABLE PERSON WITH A BRAIN CAN LOOK AT ALL THE EVIDENCE SUCH AS WHATS CLEAR AS DAY IN VIDEOS LIKE SC OR THIS FOR EXAMPLE:
www.youtube.com...
AND CLAIM THERE'S *NO* EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT NRPT.

So please stop twisting the issue and what i'm saying. I know its the only way you can make it look like you've won the argument, but like the rest of your theory and denial, its pathetic and extremely ignorant at best.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
It's called the TRUTH movement for a reason. You'd think if your "research" was really truthful, it would be embraced by the truth movement. But the total opposite has happened.


I and many OTHERS have addressed and answered that point more times than i can count, yet you continue to ignore whats been said, you fail to show how its wrong or NOT TRUTHFUL, and repeat your insane debunked mantra hoping no one will notice.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by matrixNIN11
yeah whatever M8

See, that's what I thought. You were asked to provide evidence that home videos were faked and that's all you can come up with? Yeah whatever?


you can again ignore WHAT was posted right after M8, Snip.
You think other members aren't watching your antics and keeping track of the games you play? Your campaign of propoganda and denial is beyond transparent. You've lost the argument pal... now go lick your wounds and admit its over.



Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Looks like someone is backed into a corner.


and if you look in a mirror you'll see ZenoB_


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
It's not surprising, though, as there is no evidence for you to perpetrate......unless you make it up like a true disinfo artist would.


how much do you get paid to do this?

its really quite pathetic bonez.

But let me repeat it again for you... the ONLY way your argument is true, is if you ignore the actual evidence.

thats exactly what you're doing bonez.

time to try a new disinfo tactic. The one you're using is beyond OLD.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by matrixNIN11
why don't *YOU* show us just ONE video from what you term/describe as the "ORIGINAL SOURCE".

As has been stated by me and others time and time again, it wouldn't matter to you what video you were shown or whether it was the original or not, it would still be fake to you, no matter what.


OMG. realllllly.


are you even listening to what you're saying bonez? your logic is deteriorating into being borderline psychotic.

P K B is an understatement, but your double standards are HILARIOUS.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Further, YOU are making the claim that there were no planes when the entire world knows otherwise, so YOU have to back up those claims with REAL tangible, verifiable evidence. But you give us yet another long post of blah blah blah.


www.abovetopsecret.com...

there's not one bla bla blah in that link. And if I do a search i can pull up hundreds more to make your comment look foolish and closer to a LIE.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by matrixNIN11
what i've presented above is merely a fraction of the evidence out there that PROVES beyond a doubt the MSM were complicit in the 911 hoax

As I've just stated, you haven't presented anything but a long post of blah blah blah.


www.abovetopsecret.com...

if you say so bonez.


but its so sad you can't see how foolish you look.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
If you had evidence that really proved beyond a doubt, the entire truth movement would embrace it. Scientists, physicists, engineers, etc. would be all over NPT. But they're not. They ran the OTHER way. Deemed NPT as disinfo, banned the discussion of NPT.


www.abovetopsecret.com...

you're making this way too easy bonez.

i can play this game of yours as long as you want.

now that i've answered and debunked your argument, i only have to cut and paste.


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
The lost cause that is NPT is circling around the toilet on it's way down the drain.


unfortunately for you, videos like this
www.youtube.com...
prove otherwise


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by matrixNIN11
wheres your proof and evidence that the OCT is true? show me a single video that clearly shows flight 175 or 11.

As I've stated again and AGAIN, since YOU are making the claim that there were no planes, YOU have to show CLEARLY that there were none. You can't do it and everybody knows it.


www.youtube.com...




Originally posted by _BoneZ_
I've already shown this before. 43 angles of the second plane impact from media, independent, and home videos:
www.youtube.com...


do you know what HYPOCRISY or a HYPOCRITE is bonez?

ROFL


Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Disinfo is disinfo whether some people can comprehend why it's disinfo or not.


and you should know.

[edit on 18-4-2009 by matrixNIN11]





[Mod Edit removed profanity]

Mod Note: Courtesy Is Mandatory, Please read


[edit on 18/4/2009 by Sauron]



posted on Apr, 18 2009 @ 12:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by matrixNIN11
But let me repeat it again for you... the ONLY way your argument is true, is if you ignore the actual evidence.

Why have you not yet provided to the readers of this thread, that actual evidence to which you keep referring?

If you're expecting anyone to consider your claims, then the onus is upon YOU to provide anyone who asks, the best evidence you have available.

So I ask again, a request which has been repeatedly ignored, for you to produce a high-quality video composed of segments of high-quality source material, that substantiates your claims.

Until you can comply with such a simple request, you are considered a con-artist sir.



posted on Apr, 18 2009 @ 01:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by mister.old.school Why have you not yet provided to the readers of this thread, that actual evidence to which you keep referring?


for starters, among the type of evidence proving inside job or nrpt, video evidence IS EVIDENCE.

if you claim the videos used in analysis are not from the original footage, then not only is that your problem, but the burden of proof is on you to proof its NOT, SIR.


Originally posted by mister.old.school
If you're expecting anyone to consider your claims, then the onus is upon YOU to provide anyone who asks, the best evidence you have available.


which has already been done by myself and hundreds if not thousands of others which includes what I just previously posted.

If its false and not evidence, the burden is on you to show exactly how and where its NOT, SIR.


Originally posted by mister.old.school
So I ask again, a request which has been repeatedly ignored, for you to produce a high-quality video composed of segments of high-quality source material, that substantiates your claims.


see above, SIR.


Originally posted by mister.old.school
Until you can comply with such a simple request, you are considered a con-artist sir.


as if i care or am bothered by your worthless OPINION.


once again, for starters, the visual evidence such as in the 2nd video for example, is taken directly from footage from the naudet bros video. If you want to claim its not real, the burden of proof is on you to prove it.

good luck with that one!



[edit on 18-4-2009 by matrixNIN11]



posted on Apr, 18 2009 @ 02:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by matrixNIN11
I'm saying the millions of people either don't know about NPT, don't understand it due to a lack of research

The entire 9/11 truth movement does know and has known about NPT for quite some time, so that point is moot. Many intelligent people, including myself, have spent countless hours researching and going over the NPT "theories', so that point is moot also.

All you have left is your opinionated, sad little excuse that the 9/11 truth movement won't accept NPT is because of denial. Instead of making up excuses due to your lack of real research, why don't you contact some of the .s of the 9/11 truth organizations and ask why they won't accept NPT or why NPT is banned from being discussed and see what they say. Then you can tell everyone yourself the same thing I've been saying, you have no physical, tangible, verifiable evidence.

All you have is your OPINION of what's going on in those videos. Your opinion is not fact and it is not evidence. You have a real problem separating fact from opinion. You have tons of opinions, but not a single factual piece of evidence, period.



Originally posted by mister.old.school
Until you can comply with such a simple request, you are considered a con-artist sir.

I've been saying that about the NPT disinfo artists for a couple years now. You won't get any evidence out of him. All he can do is attack, call names, use profanity, and make long post after long post of blah blah blah.

I can say with 110% certainty, we will never see any real evidence from the NPT disinfo cult.



posted on Apr, 18 2009 @ 02:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by matrixNIN11
if you claim the videos used in analysis are not from the original footage, then not only is that your problem,

See below...



once again, for starters, the visual evidence such as in the 2nd video for example, is taken directly from footage from the naudet bros video. If you want to claim its not real, the burden of proof is on you to prove it.

No, it is not taken "directly" from the Naudet video. You are either lying about the provenance of the source material, or do not know the provenance. The close ups they show are clearly heavily blurred (to hide the pixelization) zoom-ins of a compressed digital video source. Anyone with experience in the attributes of film, uncompressed digital video, and compressed digital video will spot it immediately. I strongly urge you to show this video to any unbiased expert who works with the three formats, I guarantee you they will corroborate my observations.

Since the video you linked is:
1 -- using altered source material
2 -- is a heavily compressed digital video
...it cannot be considered definitive evidence.


If this "No Plane" theory is so important to you and the proponents of the theory, why aren't you taking the effort to use the highest-quality source footage and then present your findings in the highest quality end-format?

That's all I ask. If you show me your claims with a clear video, I will believe you.



posted on Apr, 18 2009 @ 05:39 PM
link   

once again, for starters, the visual evidence such as in the 2nd video for example, is taken directly from footage from the naudet bros video.

As a follow-up to this conversation, I've ordered an HD DVD that contains the Naudet footage in high-resolution. I will digitize that segment, uncompressed, and we'll see how it compares with the version shown in the YouTube video you provided as evidence.

Fair enough?



posted on Apr, 18 2009 @ 07:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Insolubrious
 


Insolubrious,

This post is directed at your OP.

I have spent an entertaining hour or so reading through all eight (so far) pages...I don't have the stomach, yet, to plod through that over two-hour Google video...perhaps after some liquid reinforcement, I'll tackle it.

Anyway, with all of the bickering back-and-forth something important seems to be missing: WHAT, exactly, does the NPT advocate?? Where did I miss the 'alternative' that this 'theory' embraces?

John Lear was on 'The Veritas Show' just last February (Friday the 13th, actually) going on, again, about 'holograms' and secret space-based Directed Energy Weapons that blasted the WTC Towers with a de-molecularization beam....now, if you don't think that sounds crazy, then I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale....

So....which is it? John Lear's "version" of events? Missiles (with wings??)?

CD and mass hypnosis? Or, something else? I'm all ears...




top topics



 
7
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join